barrel length/accuracy difference
This is a discussion on barrel length/accuracy difference within the Defensive Carry & Tactical Training forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Range experiences this weekend. I'm a 1911 guy. My regular carry is a Kimber Pro-CarryII (4"barrel). I do shoot an old ColtMarkIVSeries70 (5") on regular ...
March 27th, 2007 12:03 PM
March 27th, 2007 12:33 PM
VIP Member (Retired Staff)
In pure terms re barrel length only - the difference IMO is quite small, altho obviously as distance is stretched effects become magnified.
I think the main difference is more a bi-product of the shorter barrel regarding the gun's feel, balance, recoil characteristics and of course too - sight radius.
A longer and maybe heavier gun, with the extra sight radius could well be usually the winner in accuracy - any lift and torque effects will be IMO less marked than on the smaller more compact gun.
Not forgetting also - even such points as grip - size and again a ''feel'' factor - all aspects affecting controllability and consistency shot to shot.
I am sure too on occasion - a smaller gun with shorter barrel can outshoot the larger longer one. Lot of variables come into play.
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.
"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."
- a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.
March 27th, 2007 12:50 PM
I’ve never really noticed that the length of the barrel itself is detrimental to the accuracy but more so the length of the sighting plane. The closer two points are together, the greater the degree of error if mis-alignment occurs. For me, this is most noticeable when shooting an iron sighted rifle as I do a lot of cowboy action shooting. With a 20” barrel, I’m a mediocre shot at best. By adding just 4” to the barrel and going with a 24” barrel, I’m able to hold my own. Stepping up to my 34” barreled Sharps, I’m even able to occasionally place in competition (target). While it’s not impossible for a shorter barreled handgun to be less accurate, especially if the rate of twist is not sufficient to impart the needed amount of spin in the short span for necessary bullet stabilization, it is most likely that any “inaccuracy” is more a factor of shorter sighting plane than shorter barrel. If you really want to know if your 4” Kimber is less accurate, I’d suggest shooting it slow fire from a solid bench rest. By carefully getting a perfect sight picture with each shot, you can determine if it’s the short barrel or short sighting plane that is affecting your accuracy.
March 27th, 2007 02:24 PM
ditto: most likely a sight radius issue.
also possible that a specific ammo choice (and the powder type burn rate) will sometimes react differently from varying lengths of barrel enough to influence/alter poi to some degree.
But, we are talking really super short snub barrels there.
Liberty Over Tyranny Μολὼν λαβέ
March 27th, 2007 02:27 PM
Packin , an inch ( or more ) of barrel makes no difference in intrinsic accuracy of a firearm , as long as there is enough tube to spin the bullet up to stable then the intrinsic accuracy will be there ( at least at pistol ranges ) . It does however make a difference in the practical accuracy since you shorten the sight radius when you shorten the barrel. As an extreme example go out in the yard with some nails or any straight " pin " that you can see and stick in the ground and string put a nail down , and look at a small object across the yard using one side of the nail , have a helper place a nail out at 1 ft using the same side . now take a third nail and set it off 90 degrees from the first , wrap a string around the two nails and pull it taunt to the target , keeping it touching the side you used and sighting the leingth of the string to keep it straight . Mark that spot on the object where the string intercets it . , then do the same thing out at 4 ft instead of 1. It illustrates how small errors in sighting become bigger as you extend an arc . I dont know your age , or physical condition/problems but it may be time for an eye exam . Myself i am latter 40s and need to get new lenses for my glasses annually anymore due to some health issues.
Long post but hope it helps somone , like a lot i pitch out here its food for thought .
Make sure you get full value out of today , Do something worthwhile, because what you do today will cost you one day off the rest of your life .
We only begin to understand folks after we stop and think .
Criminals are looking for victims, not opponents.
March 27th, 2007 08:41 PM
Thanks for all the replies. I guess I understand that it's more or less a human error issue with the sight difference, I'm just wondering how many other people really notice that much of a difference...especially since I have good eyesight. Guess it's back to basics for me.
Please take a moment to help a Veteran and one of our own: gofundme.com/5d9dfa2s
By North River in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: November 17th, 2010, 03:00 PM
By BlackJack in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
Last Post: September 4th, 2010, 06:45 AM
By JohnHenry in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: December 22nd, 2008, 10:03 AM
By Supertac45 in forum Reloading
Last Post: June 2nd, 2008, 07:12 PM
By Chevy-SS in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: January 24th, 2008, 06:41 PM