Carry Weapon Stance? - Page 2

Carry Weapon Stance?

This is a discussion on Carry Weapon Stance? within the Defensive Carry & Tactical Training forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Exclusively Weaver.......

View Poll Results: What stance do you use for your main carry weapon?

Voters
184. You may not vote on this poll
  • Weaver Stance

    63 34.24%
  • Isosceles Stance

    45 24.46%
  • Combination of the two

    47 25.54%
  • Neither of the two/Self-created Stance

    18 9.78%
  • I'm not sure

    11 5.98%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 35

Thread: Carry Weapon Stance?

  1. #16
    DC Founder
    Array Bumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    20,045
    Exclusively Weaver....
    Bumper
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde; Beware the anger of a patient man.


  2. #17
    VIP Member Array crzy4guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,637
    Voted Weaver stance.
    God bless our troops!

  3. #18
    Member Array Skysoldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    232
    I would have to say the Chapman which is the weaver with the gun arm straight
    and the support hand slightly bent

  4. #19
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    16,033
    Weaver stance.
    "In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson


    Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

  5. #20
    Member Array LUV45ACP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Central Oklahoma
    Posts
    30
    I learned what was called the modified weaver, what was just described above as the chapman stance. When I got out of being a LEO in '97 they were just starting to teach us to use the iso since that gives better coverage with a vest.

    Personally I prefer the chapman because it is a more stable shooting platform and it gives you (or at least me) the ability to "shoot and scoot" and retain balance.
    To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless.
    Lysander Spooner (1808 1887)

  6. #21
    VIP Member Array matiki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    N.W.
    Posts
    2,917
    Aggressive Isosceles.

    Like this guy:

    Personal Defense Solutions - Photo Gallery
    "Wise people learn when they can; fools learn when they must." - The Duke of Wellington

  7. #22
    VIP Member Array First Sgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Florence, SC
    Posts
    7,967
    I voted Neither of the Two. However, for target shooting, I use the modified isosceles. In a tactical situation the chances of being in a particular stance is slim to none. JMHO
    Sometimes in life you have to stand your ground. It's a hard lesson to learn and even most adults don't get it, but in the end only I can be responsible for my life. If faced with any type of adversity, only I can overcome it. Waiting for someone else to take responsibility is a long fruitless wait.

  8. #23
    VIP Member Array Tubby45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Making ammo.
    Posts
    3,051
    9mm is the only one I can get away with iso. Everything else (10mm, 45 Auto, 50AE) is weaver.
    07/02 FFL/SOT since 2006

  9. #24
    VIP Member
    Array 64zebra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Panhandle of Texas
    Posts
    6,452
    learned weaver from my dad, shot that way for 20 years

    in LE training we were taught and aggressive iso stance and a new grip (took me a couple of days to get used to it during firearms training), but once I got used to it I could see it was more stable than the weaver I had been using, had more control of the weapon and I shot a lot better
    we also use iso due to the fact that most of our body armor is toward the subject, and don't have the shoulder/armpits exposed for rounds to enter and cross the vital zone
    here is what our instructors were trained on and what we were taught:
    YouTube - Blackwater Pistol Training Course
    LEO/CHL
    Certified Glock Armorer

    "I got a touch of hangover bureaucrat, don't push me"
    --G.W. McClintock

    Independence is declared; it must be maintained. Sam Houston-3/2/1836
    If loose gun laws are good for criminals why do criminals support gun control?

  10. #25
    Senior Member Array Daddy Warcrimes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    736
    I'd describe my stance as hidari-hanmi. Left foot forward, center toward Uke. So I guess it's a combination of the traditional stances.

    I haven't had much training in pistol stances, it just seemed to work for me.
    "and suddenly I can not hold back my sword hand's anger"

    DaddyWarcrimes.com

  11. #26
    Senior Moderator
    Array pgrass101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    13,501
    Chapman
    “You can sway a thousand men by appealing to their prejudices quicker than you can convince one man by logic.”

    ― Robert A. Heinlein,

  12. #27
    VIP Member Array Janq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,781
    None of the above.

    I like a few others noted prior use when two handed shooting is appropriate and situation available the 'Modern Isosceles' method of handgun shooting, which is not a "stance" at all.

    It is though a mode of handling a handgun toward application be [the individual] static or on the move forward, reverse, or lateral.
    Similar to the images shown above by Matiki which is Modern Isosceles and he termed "Aggressive Isosceles", only grossly exaggerated by the person as depicted, I have several more normal and common imagery at different angles of view toward the same method of handgun handling be the person standing or on the move...


    Source - CQB Services: 'The Iron Hand of War'

    Julie Goloski and Doug Koenig

    Source - Smith & Wesson


    Source - Officer.com: 'The Combat Draw Stroke. A life-saving skill you must master.'



    Along with video...

    Jim Zubiena in SLOW MOTION

    Rob Leatham

    Concealed Carry Tactical "Shooting on the Move"

    Blackhawk Tips with Todd Jarrett: Shooting on the Move

    United States Shooting Academy

    And as described in detail as contrast against the Weaver and Chapman methods below;

    The Ever So Modern Isosceles - Brief Article
    American Handgunner , Jan, 2000 by Dave Anderson
    "...the modern isosceles takes the hands and arms out of the equation. The arms and hands don't pull or push, they simply hold the gun. Because the arm muscles are not rigidly locked the trigger finger can operate with greater speed and precision."
    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...24/ai_57886945

    The MODERN ISOCELES
    American Handgunner , Nov, 2000 by Ron Avery
    "The Weaver stance is -- don't be shocked -- obsolete. none of the top competitive shooters use it and police departments no longer train with Cooper's outmoded technique..."
    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...24/ai_65910635

    - Janq
    "Killers who are not deterred by laws against murder are not going to be deterred by laws against guns. " - Robert A. Levy

    "A license to carry a concealed weapon does not make you a free-lance policeman." - Florida Div. of Licensing

  13. #28
    VIP Member Array matiki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    N.W.
    Posts
    2,917
    Wow Janq. You don't mess around.

    I have to keep really low due to flatter than flat feet. I bounce as I walk if my knees aren't deeply bent and shooting on the move is near impossible, hence my "aggressive isosceles", which is really just another way of saying knees deeply bent and leaning forward into the target.

    Thanks for assembling all the links.
    "Wise people learn when they can; fools learn when they must." - The Duke of Wellington

  14. #29
    VIP Member Array Janq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,781
    Additionally Matiki that pic being yourself (I didn't realize this prior) shows _additional benefit_ for a person in your individual physical condition situation toward getting 'small' whilst using the Modern Isosceles method.
    It's generally tough to hit a target at all muchless a small (not tall nor wide) target, even if it might be static. Especially if said smaller than tall and static target is firing/returning fire at you with purpose and accuracy (!).

    Exceptions of course are children and school shooters in specific who have an uncanny and remarkable knack for pulling off head shots even out to 10 yard distances (!). Able to do multiples of times in shot to shot succession against static and even moving victims all the while using most any caliber handgun with little to no prior training. :|

    Anyway I wanted to not just report but show and educate as well so that others in this thread posting or reading might see or learn something new to them outside their own individual amount of training degree.

    - Janq
    "Killers who are not deterred by laws against murder are not going to be deterred by laws against guns. " - Robert A. Levy

    "A license to carry a concealed weapon does not make you a free-lance policeman." - Florida Div. of Licensing

  15. #30
    Senior Member Array gddyup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Derry, NH
    Posts
    988
    I voted Weaver, but I shoot more of a Modified form or more that of the "Tactical" stance mentioned earlier. I lower my stance quite a bit more than the normal Weaver. Almost like a boxer type stance bladed off but with a handgun. It's more comfortable for me, allows me to move easier, and makes my shooting more accurate.
    Firefighter/EMT
    "You've never lived until you've almost died. For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know" - T.R.

    <----My LT was unhappy that I did not have my PASS-Tag at that fire. But I found the body so he said he would overlook it. :)

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Got a new carry weapon!
    By fox2102 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: May 15th, 2009, 06:32 PM
  2. How big is your carry weapon?
    By Blackeagle in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 92
    Last Post: May 8th, 2007, 08:30 AM
  3. Help with Carry Weapon
    By yodapsych in forum New Members Introduce Yourself
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: March 18th, 2007, 07:31 AM
  4. New carry weapon
    By cpmiv in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: February 21st, 2007, 02:56 PM
  5. My Carry Weapon
    By Rickman in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: December 17th, 2004, 01:12 AM

Search tags for this page

3 weapons carrying stances
,
florida stance on weapons
,
isosceles stance
,

jim zubiena

,
julie goloski
,
julie goloski.
,
modern isosceles shooting stance
,
ron avery weaver vs isosceles
,
tactical weapons carrying stances
,
weapon stance
,
weapon stances
,
weaver stance pros and cons
Click on a term to search for related topics.