Carry Weapon Stance?

This is a discussion on Carry Weapon Stance? within the Defensive Carry & Tactical Training forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Hello all, What stance do you use for your main carry weapon? I have been doing some research, and it looks like the two main ...

View Poll Results: What stance do you use for your main carry weapon?

Voters
184. You may not vote on this poll
  • Weaver Stance

    63 34.24%
  • Isosceles Stance

    45 24.46%
  • Combination of the two

    47 25.54%
  • Neither of the two/Self-created Stance

    18 9.78%
  • I'm not sure

    11 5.98%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: Carry Weapon Stance?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array Plop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,013

    Carry Weapon Stance?

    Hello all,

    What stance do you use for your main carry weapon? I have been doing some research, and it looks like the two main stances are the Weaver Stance and the Isosceles Stance. The class I just returned from taught the Weaver stance, which worked pretty well for me. I'm sure there are pros and cons to both stances, but I was just wondering which stance the majority of people used.

    Thanks,
    Plop


    *EDIT* Option 4 should read:
    Neither of the two/Self-created Stance/Other Stance

    Please list the other type of stance if applicable. Thanks!
    "In America, freedom and justice have always come from the ballot box, the jury box, and when that fails, the cartridge box."
    -- Steve Symms, US Senator from Idaho, 1990

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Ex Member Array BikerRN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    State of Discombobulation
    Posts
    5,253
    I grew up shooting Weaver, started wearing a vest and switched to Isocoles.

    Biker

  4. #3
    Member Array dbeachy1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    19
    I've only been shooting for about a month, but I prefer Isosceles (I've tried both) -- it just feels more natural to me. Of course, YMMV.
    Sig .40 P229 DAK
    XDM 9mm
    CrossBreed SuperTuck

  5. #4
    VIP Member Array Pikachu711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    2,461
    It depends upon the circumstances when I have to bring my handgun to bear on the bad guy.
    If I'm at home daytime I prefer isosceles. If it's after dark and I'm hearing "sounds" from downstairs in the house I go with one hand (right) with a flashlight in my left hand.
    I have used weaver but find isosceles more natural. But I tend to use both weaver & isosceles with equal comfort.
    "Gun control is being able to hit your target."
    Glock 26

  6. #5
    VIP Member
    Array sigmanluke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    3,209
    I chose neither/other.

    I learned first with isocoles, but don't like it. Then I switched to weaver, but ended up in between with what an instructor calles "tactical stance". Body less turned than weaver, smaller target than isocoles. Easy to move, comfortable and stable to shoot from. I'm also most accurate from this stance.
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
    Thomas Jefferson

  7. #6
    Distinguished Member Array Rcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,747
    I use the weaver. I learned to shoot a handgun in the '70s and thats how I was taught. However, I now teach both in my classes.
    "Government is not the solution to our problem; government IS the problem". - Ronald Reagan 1981

  8. #7
    VIP Member Array Ridgeline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,092
    I too am a forever "Weaver" person. However, we also teach both in our classes, and encourage our students to use the one that feel most normal for them. I once saw a sign that went something like this "If your stance is perfect in a gunfight, you are most likely not using cover". As has been said already, use what works for your, there is no real right and wrong between those two.
    Last edited by Ridgeline; March 14th, 2009 at 12:06 PM. Reason: <sp>
    "Eternity is Too Long to be Wrong"

    Texas CHL Instructor & Holder & Utah CFP Instructor
    NRA Instructor & Life Member
    Member TSRA, USCCA, TCHA
    Christian, Heterosexual, Pro-2A, Pro-Life, Conservative, Common Sense American

  9. #8
    VIP Member Array boricua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    3,873
    I am more consistent and accurate using the Isosceles stance.
    Duty, Honor, Country...MEDIC!!!
    ¡Cuánto duele crecer, cuan hondo es el dolor de alzarse en puntillas y observar con temblores de angustia, esa cosa tremenda, que es la vida del hombre! - René Marqués

  10. #9
    VIP Member Array Blackeagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    2,147
    To the extent that I use a stance, I shoot Weaver.

    In a fight, you probably shouldn't be using an exact square range stance much, if at all. You should be moving and shooting from behind cover/concealment. You may end up shooting one handed, shooting from retention, even shooting in the middle of a wrestling match with your assailant.

    Stances are like training wheels. They're good for getting started and learning the basics, but if you want to actually get good, the training wheels need to come off so you can learn to shoot from a much wider range of positions.

    I think something along the lines of 'combat posture' is a more useful way to think about this than stance. Get up on the balls of your feet, lean forward, get a proper grip on the gun and extend it. Don't worry too much about the exact position of your feet or arms, move fluidly and adapt to the environment and situation.

  11. #10
    Senior Member Array psychophipps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Texas, in the RGV
    Posts
    747
    I use a "Modern Isosceles" (feet not directly under the shoulders) or (less often) a Chapman (Modified Weaver) stance.

  12. #11
    Senior Member Array MilitaryPower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    976
    Isosceles with right foot slightly behind for stability.
    Gun control can be blamed in part for allowing 9/11 to happen.
    "Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum" (Latin)- "If you want peace, prepare for war".

  13. #12
    VIP Member Array semperfi.45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Over here now!
    Posts
    3,615
    I move between all as the situation dictates. That said; I learned Weaver in the Marines, but modified Iso is the primary foundation of my fighting platform.

    Iso is far superior as a shooting stance, especially when interchanging different weapons systems into it.
    Training means learning the rules. Experience means learning the exceptions.

  14. #13
    VIP Member
    Array goawayfarm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Fork Union, Virginia
    Posts
    2,690
    Modified Weaver....I have cross-eye dominance & it helps me. (I also practice while moving in different directions in relation to target, since in a real shoot out I'M GONNA BE MOVING!)
    Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.-Seneca

    "If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. If I have a gun, what do I have to be paranoid about?" -Clint Smith

    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Jeff Cooper

  15. #14
    VIP Member
    Array Thumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    7,235
    Weaver... just the way I've been trained and it works very well for me.
    ALWAYS carry! - NEVER tell!

    "A superior Operator is best defined as someone who uses his superior
    judgement to keep himself out of situations that would require a display of his
    superior skills."

  16. #15
    VIP Member Array obxned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    OBX, NC
    Posts
    2,655
    In the real world, stance is the least of your worries. Lack of time and the closeness of the encounter make it irrelevent.
    "If we loose Freedom here, there's no place to escape to. This is the Last Place on Earth!" Ronald Reagan

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Got a new carry weapon!
    By fox2102 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: May 15th, 2009, 06:32 PM
  2. How big is your carry weapon?
    By Blackeagle in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 92
    Last Post: May 8th, 2007, 08:30 AM
  3. Help with Carry Weapon
    By yodapsych in forum New Members Introduce Yourself
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: March 18th, 2007, 07:31 AM
  4. New carry weapon
    By cpmiv in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: February 21st, 2007, 02:56 PM
  5. My Carry Weapon
    By Rickman in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: December 17th, 2004, 01:12 AM

Search tags for this page

3 weapons carrying stances
,
florida stance on weapons
,
isosceles stance
,

jim zubiena

,
julie goloski
,
julie goloski.
,
modern isosceles shooting stance
,
ron avery weaver vs isosceles
,
tactical weapons carrying stances
,
weapon stance
,
weapon stances
,
weaver stance pros and cons
Click on a term to search for related topics.