The perfect draw vs dynamic deployment

The perfect draw vs dynamic deployment

This is a discussion on The perfect draw vs dynamic deployment within the Defensive Carry & Tactical Training forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Many of us have done thousands and thousands of presentations from the holster during dry fire and live fire. Often when we do we are ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
  1. #1
    Senior Member Array mercop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    1,067

    The perfect draw vs dynamic deployment

    Many of us have done thousands and thousands of presentations from the holster during dry fire and live fire. Often when we do we are flat footed and don't have to move until we have the gun presented at the target. Here are some stills of what it looks like when you need to move as you draw. So much for economy of motion. Both of these guys are experienced shooters, the bottom like is that under during dynamic movement all body angles change and so will your draw. Both shooters are drawing in response to a visual stimuli. The second shooter first had to panic push the target that is laying down before engaging the second target.





  2. #2
    Distinguished Member Array orangevol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Southwest, TN
    Posts
    1,246
    The guy in the 2nd photo looks like he's going to fall down before he gets his gun drawn.
    Proud NRA member

  3. #3
    VIP Member
    Array Pistology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    South Coast LA Cty
    Posts
    2,088
    Pictures lie. If the force of gravity and movement of the subject in the 2nd photo is in line with his center line that is connected to his base, then he has what Gabe Suarez calls the necessary elements of stance: balance, movement and stability.
    Americans understood the right of self-preservation as permitting a citizen to repel force by force
    when the intervention of society... may be too late to prevent an injury.
    -Blackstone’s Commentaries 145–146, n. 42 (1803) in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)

  4. #4
    Ex Member Array Ram Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    13,687
    I'm betting the second shooter pushed the static target with his left hand instead of using his right hand........anticipating his right hand draw on the live target. That's why I think he's out of balance and position and not recovering quick enough.

  5. #5
    Ex Member Array BikerRN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    State of Discombobulation
    Posts
    5,253
    Pictures don't tell the whole story, and only capture a split second moment in time of the situation.

    Biker

  6. #6
    VIP Member
    Array Pistology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    South Coast LA Cty
    Posts
    2,088
    Quote Originally Posted by Ram Rod View Post
    I'm betting the second shooter pushed the static target with his left hand instead of using his right hand........anticipating his right hand draw on the live target. That's why I think he's out of balance and position and not recovering quick enough.
    I agree that he probably pushed with his left only because it's his natural lead and the direction of movement, and his gun is on his right side where it's better to have the right hand available for retention.
    However, he next employs a two-handed draw that occupies both hands simultaneously: the left hand is raising the cover garmet and the right is on the grip. There's no panic push with one and favoring the other by holding it in reserve.
    He's moving from a fist fight to a gun fight. He must've slapped that target down pretty fast for it to be flat on the ground. And he is moving aggressively to the 11 o'clock of the next target and probably scored some good hits on it.
    I guess he's about right but maybe there is a faster way to get from A to B with practice of smooth motion.
    Americans understood the right of self-preservation as permitting a citizen to repel force by force
    when the intervention of society... may be too late to prevent an injury.
    -Blackstone’s Commentaries 145–146, n. 42 (1803) in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array unloved's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Southeastern Pennsylvania
    Posts
    568
    Quote Originally Posted by Ram Rod View Post
    I'm betting the second shooter pushed the static target with his left hand instead of using his right hand........
    Quote Originally Posted by Pistology View Post
    I agree that he probably pushed with his left only because it's his natural lead and the direction of movement, and his gun is on his right side where it's better to have the right hand available for retention.
    I can't say for sure, as I wasn't there, but I expect he used both hands.
    That's what George teaches. A good solid shove to at least rock 'em back on their heels and give you a little time to work.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array mercop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    1,067
    He used both hands, that is how I teach the Panic Push. The idea is that hopefully the guy is not far from a vertical surface and this if done correctly may end the confrontation. You use the heel of both hands up under the numbers as you would in football. With force this causes the head to snap back and the eyes to close, when the eyes close they take a snap shot of the last image they saw, when you open them again they focus to the front so the idea is not to be there anymore. The arms go out to the side in an attempt to regain balance and you get put back on your heels. During classes we usually have someone stand behind the guy being pushed or he will fall or smash into something. Most people don't need to have this done to them more than once at combat speed to have faith in it.

    When I came on the job they still taught that BS about striking with your weak hand as you drew and fired. So during a life and death situation you are going to not only use one hand, but you your weak hand to strike at your attacker likely only striking his hand. This was obviously instituted by gun guys who had no understanding of combatives. Go get some buddies and try the panic push, tell me what you think?- George

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array mercop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    1,067


    Here is a little video of the tough guy defense, you can kinda get the jist.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array jdsumner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    riverview, fl
    Posts
    765
    "When I came on the job they still taught that BS about striking with your weak hand as you drew and fired. So during a life and death situation you are going to not only use one hand, but you your weak hand to strike at your attacker likely only striking his hand. This was obviously instituted by gun guys who had no understanding of combatives."-mercop

    If the actions you are describing match the criteria for the Taylor Speedrock, I'd venture to say this guy has more understanding of combatives than a lot of people. ChuckTaylorOptions.gif
    For it to have been taught for so long, it would have had to have some success.

    That being said, everything that becomes successful evolves.
    Other instructors teach driving the elbow into the face, ducking and driving into the opponent, drawing to retention and firing.
    There is a number of different close quarters options available in the chest to chest situation.
    One thing I've learned from a number of instructors well trained in combatives is that: If you give someone a lever (ie, extending your hands/arms foreward out to your opponent) they may use it. As an example, in one of Randy Cain's classes, I stood chest to chest and attempted to Speedrock him. Once face down in the soggy Lakeland mud, I realized this MAY not be the answere. Keeping my draw the same, (non dom hand stays tight against abs) and stepping off the x while firing from retention without extending any levers to my opponent gave my attacker less 'handles and lever's' to take advantage of.
    Many different responses to many a changing situation.

    Mercop,
    please don't read my post as anything but respectful to you and the services you provide. I've learned in the past few days how easily the written word can be misunderstood or misleading in its prose. I do appreciate what you are teaching: an evolution of success responses.
    Just thought I'd add a little of what I've learned in an effort to add to the knowledge base of the forum.

    dan

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array jdsumner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    riverview, fl
    Posts
    765
    ..........and now to add to my ramblings.

    I think one thing a lot of us overlook, myself especially, is the evolution of the enemy.
    We see more and more instructors striving to teach situational awareness- in an effort to see the attack early on.
    We see more emphasis put on 'scanning' after a shoot. Why? More and more the enemy is utilizing numbers.
    We are constantly required to evolve our techniques in an attempt to stay one step ahead of the enemy.
    The Speedrock may have been the answer awhile ago, and may still serve under certain criteria. But the enemy on the street is likely a repeat felon. Someone who trains w other felons in the system. Some thugs are taking the lessons taught in the mil and using them against their fellow man. Some are accomplished in mma, or hand to hands of other varieties. I believe the enemy has evolved as fast as the good guys. The enemy is not just a street thug anymore. Give him a lever, he'll use it. Jamb him up, he may be caught by surprise and flinch giving you time to evade draw, or ...not. Step off the x, draw and fire from retention, maybe it works maybe not. But maybe you havent offered him an arm or hand to use against you. One thing is a constant, being that close is a bad thing.

    Thanks again to all the instructors out there who press onward and continue to teach survival via the only proven method....evolution.

    dan

  12. #12
    Senior Member Array mercop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    1,067
    No worries. I am not a fan and do not advocate the Speed Rock. I have seen some shooters who are fast with it and get accurate fire. This is with lots of practice. What I see more often was is the other 80% of shooters including in service and entrance level police who more often put rounds high into the left shoulder. Personally I find that what I teach takes less time to teach, in more natural, highly retainable and and provides overall continuity for the use/defense of open hand, stick, knife, and gun, within 7 yards and that is what I do.

    Here are one more issue I have with the Speed Rock, the first is that it more than any other technique at this range causes the student to bow his hips forward and his head back, this inhibits forward motion and off balances you.

    Again, it is about the application. Most people who are referred to by others as excellent shooters are thought of that way because of great skill when it comes to hitting inanimate objects fast and accurately. This takes a lot of training, time and dedication. But just like doing martial arts with a mirror instead of another live person, it does little to inoculate the shooter against the chaos of a real force on force situation. This level of shooting can take a long time to achieve, mostly because we cannot use the fundamental teaching concept of using the known to teach the unknown when it comes to shooting. Nothing else we do mimics it. I will give you and example. Sage wisdom is focusing on the front sight during a fight right? That is a great idea, but a problem, especially for beginners is that at extension the front sight is usually twice the natural focal distance of 11-13 inches (depending on how old you are;) ).

    I take a mixed bad of shooters over a weekend, ranging from competitive shooters to people who are just gun safe CCW folks and buy the end of a weekend have them putting accurate rounds on target from the groin to high chest at 0-10 yards. This while being provoked by a visual stimuli, while moving and taking control of another shooter simulating a loved one. On our targets I only count misses. I also ask that at the end of everyone doing a particular drill for shooters come forward and point out whose rounds are whose in the riddled mass of the middle of the targets. They are unable to do so. Where you see the difference in the shooters is as they get back past 7-10 yards and get to go two hands on the gun. This is where experienced shooter steal the show. Then we move onto force on force where they need to defend against open hand, impact weapons, edged weapons and guns.

    I put an incredible amount of information on the net, it is meant to provoke discussion. I have no problem evidencing or explaining what I do. Thanks for your comments and questions- George

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array jdsumner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    riverview, fl
    Posts
    765
    Thank you for your response. I hope I haven't derailed your thread from its original purpose. I look foreward to your next posting.

    As to your original post, I have seen handguns drawn in some rather 'unorthodox' manners when stress is applied. That's one of the reasons I'm such a fan of instructors who take the time to cover personal/situational awareness, so that we (students) on the street don't have to make a quickdraw.

    dan

  14. #14
    Member Array JohnN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by jdsumner View Post
    Thank you for your response. I hope I haven't derailed your thread from its original purpose. I look foreward to your next posting.

    As to your original post, I have seen handguns drawn in some rather 'unorthodox' manners when stress is applied. That's one of the reasons I'm such a fan of instructors who take the time to cover personal/situational awareness, so that we (students) on the street don't have to make a quickdraw.

    dan
    But don't you think if we had the situational awareness to see the problem developing we would have the good sense to remove ourselves from the scene?

    I have been a competition shooter for years and after taking George's Combative Pistol class in October which contains a force on force component my eyes were opened. In most instances the situation will happen very quickly and you must react and try to catch up. Back in my Cooper days I practiced the speed rock and thought that was the true answer to most extreme close range encounters, not.

    IMHO, adopting George's drop step and threat focused shooting at 7 yds and in has helped me prepare for that day. In many instances drawing the gun too quickly is exactly the wrong thing to do depending on the situation.

    Most of the square range practice that we do at most ranges doesn't really prepare us for the real thing. Force on Force is about the truest test that we can come up with to measure likely success in an assault situation.
    "America is not at war. The Marine Corps is at war; America is at the mall."

  15. #15
    Member Array black knife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Indio, Ca.
    Posts
    135
    Striking to the throat with the weak hand while you draw is more proficient. Nobody can take a strike to the throat.
    "You fight the way you Train"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Magpul Art of the Dynamic Shotgun DVD's
    By tacman605 in forum Defensive Books, Video & References
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: April 10th, 2011, 04:53 PM
  2. Knife deployment problem.
    By Rollo in forum Defensive Knives & Other Weapons
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: June 30th, 2010, 01:05 PM
  3. A couple photos from my Deployment (thus far)
    By SweetSig in forum Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: May 29th, 2009, 04:34 PM
  4. A few pics from my deployment
    By C9H13NO3 in forum Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: March 6th, 2009, 10:44 PM

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» DefensiveCarry Sponsors