Best Value 5.56 Rifle - Page 2

Best Value 5.56 Rifle

This is a discussion on Best Value 5.56 Rifle within the Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Thanks glockman10mm, you summed up why I was looking at the mini-14 first. Originally Posted by glockman10mm Actually, instead of buying gadgets to hang on ...

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 84
Like Tree18Likes

Thread: Best Value 5.56 Rifle

  1. #16
    Member Array WonderBra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    268
    Thanks glockman10mm, you summed up why I was looking at the mini-14 first.

    Quote Originally Posted by glockman10mm View Post
    Actually, instead of buying gadgets to hang on one, one is better off to buy a good water purification system, long term storage food, and ammo.
    Trying to get there ...


  2. #17
    VIP Member Array glockman10mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    9,499
    Wonderbra, I really think you would love the mini. But I don't have a dog in the fight here. Only my opinion. I like them both, but in reality, for your intended purpose, the mini is the way to go. If you get the ranch version, it comes with detachable scope rings, and still has the flip up sight.

    It's really a personal preference. My next 5.56 will be a new Mini Ranch.
    Ignorance is a long way from stupid, but left unchecked, can get there real fast.

  3. #18
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,367
    A variable power scope is the only accessory on my Mini 14, other than the sling (a plain 2 point one, at that). I leave it set at low power for the more likely close-range work, but like having the ability to dial up more magnification if needed. I avoid the "tacticool" look with all manner of gadgets hung on my rifle.

    My Marlin 336 is set up the same, with the sole addition of an elastic butt cuff for more ammo on board, given the tube mag's lower capacity.

    If you can, try out some of your options before you buy.
    The more good folks carry guns, the fewer shots the crazies can get off.
    www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
    Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger SP101, LCR, Mini 14; Marlin 336 .30-30; Mossberg 500
    CT Lasers

  4. #19
    VIP Member
    Array atctimmy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Gastonville
    Posts
    6,754
    I like AR15s and I have two of them....but the question the OP asked is best value. The best value out there is an AK 74 type rifle chambered in 5.45 X 39. You can get a quality AK74 or clone for about $450. On top of that you add in the fact that NOTHING is as cheap to shoot as 5.45 X 39. The 74 would be just fine for IDPA and HD. It is all the rifle you would ever need for man sized targets out to 300yds.

    Check AIM or JG sales for pricing ideas.

    If you absolutely must have an AR then the best way to get a good one on the cheap is to have your money ready when the sale comes along. I ( and two or three others here at DC) bought S&W M&P 15s last year when they were only $600. That is a HECK of a lot of value in a AR type rifle. The key was that I was ready to buy when the sale came along and I saved a boatload.

    Google CDNN investments for AR sale pricing.
    I havenít heard any of the journalists who volunteered to be waterboarded asking to have their fingernails wrenched out with pliers, or electrodes attached to their genitals.

  5. #20
    VIP Member Array jonconsiglio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Corpus Christi, Texas
    Posts
    3,172
    Quote Originally Posted by glockman10mm View Post
    I also like the operating rod piston system over the AR gas system for hard use. Another important factor is the ability to have finger access to the chamber.
    Ok, you had your chance…. Now I'm really MAD! I'll give the piston system credit as long as it's NOT on an AR….

    EDIT - This is like the freakin' Twilight Zone here today.. Y'all are freaking me out and I'm starting to feel a little nauseous!
    Proven combat techniques may not be flashy and may require a bit more physical effort on the part of the shooter. Further, they may not win competition matches, but they will help ensure your survival in a shooting or gunfight on the street. ~Paul Howe

  6. #21
    Senior Member Array wormy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,147
    Best value? DPMS Sportical. $530.00. Po boys AR. Perfect for varmint hunting. Im not into fancy $3000 ARs. If I were going to war Id probaly choose something else, but my DPMS has been perfect. It will shoot a snuff can all to pieces at 100yards. Can your Mini do that?

    Glock 22, 27 Gen 4
    Ruger SP101 .357mag
    S&W 637 Airweight
    Ruger Single Six
    Ruger Blackhawk Bisley 45 Colt
    Mossberg 835 Grand Slam

  7. #22
    VIP Member Array Kilowatt3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SW Louisiana
    Posts
    3,043
    I'm a big fan of both the Mini-14 and AR platforms.

    Got my first Mini-14 in (IIRC) 1978, and it's still one of the most plain ol' "fun guns" I've ever had. I paid $279 for it, because I couldn't quite see the extra $50-$100 that an AR would have cost at the time. Got my second in 1994 as insurance, just in case the "Assault Weapons Ban" made it impossible to ever get another one.

    Since those days, the price of Mini-14's has continued to go up, while many economical AR models came out, closing the price gap. Got my first AR just a few months ago (S&W M&P), and it's a real "fun gun" too! Availability of mags & accessories figured in to that choice, but I mainly got it 'cause I just wanted one.

    I don't think you can go wrong with either one, although I'm sure there are a few low-end AR's that you might want to avoid. I never had any issues with my Mini-14's, either accuracy or reliability, except when I tried a few cheap aftermarket mags that just weren't reliable. I'm still looking for a good aftermarket polymer mag, and have brought that up in another thread. Not sure if there is a really good one out there, and the factory mags are steep! They're also all steel, so you can't have the benefits of light weight & dent-resistance that the polymers offer. Magpul - are you listening???

    Anyway, GL on the shopping, and have fun with whatever you get!

    Regards,
    Jim

  8. #23
    VIP Member Array glockman10mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    9,499
    Wormy, I don't give a damn bout hitting snuff cans at 100 yards....they don't shoot back. Besides that I chew it so I routinely " kill a can" with my hands. :D

    But yes, at 100 yards, with a scope mounted such as yours, it will do it with boring regularity.
    Ignorance is a long way from stupid, but left unchecked, can get there real fast.

  9. #24
    sgb
    sgb is offline
    VIP Member Array sgb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    You don't need to know
    Posts
    2,414
    All my AR's I've assembled myself, if I were looking for a best buy for the buck for the general consumer I'd go with the S&W Model M&P15 - MOE

    "There is a secret pride in every human heart that revolts at tyranny. You may order and drive an individual, but you cannot make him respect you." William Hazlitt (1778 - 1830)

    Best Choices for Self Defense Ammunition

  10. #25
    Member Array blkobra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    lake arrowhead
    Posts
    36
    Have the mini's ..14 and 30...Ar platform also...kinda lookin at the new ruger scout??? just an idea..

  11. #26
    VIP Member Array zacii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    arizona
    Posts
    3,807
    Best value 5.56 rifle. That is entirely dependent on your definition of value, and your intended philosophy of use for such.

    First off, be aware that some run of the mill, off the shelf ARs are not chambered for 5.56, they are good to go with .223. There is a difference. That difference doesn't matter, unless you want to shoot up some military surplus ammo.

    I have no first hand experience, but have read extensively on m4carbine forum, and that is not an uncommon problem.

    There are a bunch of different options, here. You could pick up a Saiga .223. It's a variant of the AK, and can be had for ~$350.

    It sounds like you're leaning a bit toward the Mini-14. They are fine guns with an excellent reputation for reliability. It gets 2 or 3 MOA accuracy; for some that's perfectly acceptable, but not for others.

    You can get top notch AR rifles for the same price as lesser ones. But, depending on your usage, any AR may do. S&W M&P
    Sport models and the DPMS Sportical, are budget AR rifles. They lack just a few bells and whistles, but otherwise may serve fine for a recreational shooter.

    .223/5.56 are excellent HD guns, there are lots of good ammo to choose from.
    Trust in God and keep your powder dry

    "A heavily armed citizenry is not about overthrowing the government; it is about preventing the government from overthrowing liberty. A people stripped of their right of self defense is defenseless against their own government." -source

  12. #27
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,367
    Quote Originally Posted by zacii View Post
    It sounds like you're leaning a bit toward the Mini-14. They are fine guns with an excellent reputation for reliability. It gets 2 or 3 MOA accuracy; for some that's perfectly acceptable, but not for others.
    Sorry, but this is incorrect. My newer Mini 14 (with a scope) gets 1.5 inch groups at 100 yards with a hot barrel and cheap ammo, from a bench with no bipod.

    Basically, there is no reason to eschew the Mini 14 for accuracy concerns anymore.

    You can get a cheaper 5.56 semi auto in an AK platform, and there is the 5.45 option that is cheaper still, as has been mentioned. However, neither the AR nor the AK allow you direct access to the bolt/chamber. I will agree with glockman10mm that this is another advantage in the Mini's favor.
    The more good folks carry guns, the fewer shots the crazies can get off.
    www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
    Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger SP101, LCR, Mini 14; Marlin 336 .30-30; Mossberg 500
    CT Lasers

  13. #28
    VIP Member Array jonconsiglio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Corpus Christi, Texas
    Posts
    3,172
    Quote Originally Posted by glockman10mm View Post
    Jon, I conceed to you that you are more knowledgable in the black rifle category than I, lol. It is just one of those things that I never really dived into. Hell, I can't know EVERYTHING! :)

    but I carried one on real bsiness for 8 years, and taught tactical shooting up until last year , and I honestly never saw any issues with any of them. I am old school though. I can take a mil spec rifle and kill you dead from 25 yards to 500 yards, A2 sights and A2 rifle just as well as I can with a $3500 rifle.

    But, if you really want me to come down there and show a Texan how it's done, I am aiming for September,:)

    PS...Do you think you can let me drive one of those cool foreign cars of yours? Also, and this is on a serious note, I would like to know what makes the difference in a real quality AR and an over the counter type. Do these differences really justify the added cost in the real world?
    Those cars…. I just sneak over to my neighbors when they're not looking and snap some quick pics!

    Ok, let's get down to business here and let me tell you what my experiences are and why TO ME a mil spec AR is a must, not a luxury or something that would be nice, but not really needed. Let me start by saying I have owned many different ARs and components (like rails, mounts, optics, etc) from, but not limited to, DPMS, Bushmaster, S&W, RRA, Noveske, Bravo Co, LaRue, Knight's Armament, LMT, LWRC, Troy, Magpul, Vltor, Aimpoint, EoTech, Daniel Defense and I'm sure a few others. As a qualifier, I shoot about 500 to 750 rounds a week, give or take, usually involving some sort of drill, not just off of a bench. I work with and train LE's and civilians in typically "advanced" carbine. I attend somewhere between 2 to 5 training classes a year, again typically advanced carbine and tactics. I only clean my guns when they're extremely filthy and I lube with Slip EWL before each day of shooting. A general cleaning occurs once every 1,000 to 2,000 rounds with maybe an occasional wipe down of the bolt if need I just thought I should throw that out there so you know I don't just shoot 500 rounds a year from a bench.

    Now, let's first get the myth of price out of the way… You can walk into a shop right now and pick up a Bushmaster, S&W or RRA for what, $900 to $1,100? Maybe $800 for a DPMS? Now, we can buy a higher quality Bravo Company, Colt or LMT for about…….$900 to $1,100! You can also buy a Daniel Defense for about $1,200 from a good shop, but part of that higher price is their rail systems. The DD rails (Lite and RIS II) typically cost between 4350 to $400 where a Troy or whatever Bushmaster uses costs $150 or so.

    So, I think we need to bust the all too common myth that a quality AR is FAR more expensive than a commercial grade Bushmaster, RRA, etc. Worst case scenario, we're looking at $100 more for a similarly configured AR… We cannot compare a tricked out Knight's Armament SR15 which includes a $200 stock, $330 trigger, $350 to $450 rail, $200 rear sight, $80 selector, $390 e3 bolt plus the $100 M16 bolt carrier and not mentioning the chf semi-lightweight $400 barrel and ambi lower. Funny thing is, that SR15 with well over $1,300 in upgrades over a base model Bushmaster/RRA/S&W only costs about $1,900 depending on the dealer/distributor. Remember too, if we compare of base model from Bravo Company and a base model from Bushmaster, that even though the prices are similar, we automatically get more "stuff" with the Bravo Co… For example, we're getting a quality receiver extension, not a cheap commercial tube… we're getting a higher quality chrome lined, cold hammer forged barrel…. we're getting a better stock and an appropriate buffer. So, we're looking at maybe $200 to $300 in "extras" comparing base model to base model, so even if the Bravo Co is $100 more, it's not like we're not getting 3x that amount in "stuff".

    So, what exactly makes a Bravo Co/Daniel Defense/Colt/LMT/Noveske (we'll call this group "A") better than a Bushmaster/DPMS/RRA/S&W/Stag (we'll call this group "B")?? I'm glad you asked! We'll start at the rear and work our way forward…

    The first thing we get is a quality mil spec receiver extension with an appropriate buffer for the given gas system. If it's a carbine gas system on a 16" barrel, we're already looking at too much gas coming into the gun. Two (well, three actually) things will play into this. One is the size of the gas port and the other is the buffer and the bolt carrier group. For a carbine gassed 16" gun, we're going to need at least an H buffer even with the smallest of gas ports. Group "A" includes the appropriate buffer where group "B" only includes a carbine buffer in most cases or charges more for the "upgrade" which isn't an upgrade at all. The problem with using the carbine buffer is…..the bolt can start to unlock while the case is still expanded inside the chamber….the carrier can trail faster than it should which can cause bolt bounce on the return….the carrier can "beat" the magazine spring and fail to strip a fresh round….the recoil is harsher than it should be which causes slower follow-up shots regardless of who you are and how "little" recoil a 5.56 demonstrates.

    Next, group "B" will include a semi auto bolt carrier while group "A" will include a full auto M16 carrier. Despite what the local gun shop guru may have told you, the ATF DOES allow the use of the full auto carrier and it IS NOT considered manufacturing a machine gun like the old myth says. I actually have a letter from the ATF around to prove this fact. To keep it simple, we'll just say the same issues exist with the semi carrier as caused by the carbine buffer, for the most part.

    A small, easily fixed oversight to some and a huge demonstration of a company's commitment to it's customers to others is staking. To me, I'd prefer the end plate be left un-staked as I change it out anyway, but I cannot accept no staking or poor staking of the gas key. An improperly or non-staked gas key can lead to the screws backing out and gas leakage causing the carrier to short stroke. Bad, bad, bad. Also, group "B" is notorious for improperly torquing the screws of the gas key, so one could argue staking is even more important with this group since they do it wrong to begin with.

    As for the lower receiver, even DPMS has been good about using 7075, but they are inconsistent. Trigger pins will have a higher tendency to walk than in group "A". There's a post right now by a distributor on one of the M4 sites showing two lower receivers he received from DPMS that have cracks from the bottom of the magwell all the way to the top. Both have the exact same cracks or fractures. DPMS would NOT take these back at first and said they were fine. After many months they finally were willing to do something, but he told them never-mind as he'd rather keep them on display in his shop to show customers. Good stuff!

    Now we're looking at barrels. Some of these differences will small to some and huge to others. Almost all barrels from group "A" are going to be chrome lined, cold hammer forged (there's a standard barrel option from BCM for $100 less) and made of B-11595E. Group "B" will have 4140 or 4150. I don't want to make this twice as long as it is, so here's some info on the barrel steel. Barrel Steel: 4150, 4140, Chrome Moly, CMV - M4Carbine.net Forums

    A chrome lined, cold hammer forged B-11595E barrel is going to give you longevity. For some this may not be a big deal, but the difference between groups opening up at 4,000 to 6,000 rounds or them opening up at 10,000 to 15,000 is a big deal to me as I can burn out a barrel in less than a year. We're not talking about Glocks here that can go 100,000 rounds and be replaced for $150 or less. A good AR barrel will be around $350 then we may need the gas block and gas tube.

    Group "A" will always have a true 5.56 chamber. Group "B" will be much less consistent and even when marked 5.56, a go/no-go gauge is necessary as many have claimed 5.56 but used .223 chamber in the past and I know of two that still do. This is bad as it can not only cause very serious malfunctions that can ruin your day, they create dangerous pressures that can ruin your gun. Failures I have personally experienced.

    Group "A" will use a 1:7 twist. In almost all cases this is a plus. There's a lot of talk about a 1:7 barrel not handling lighter (shorter) loads as well as a 1:9. This is only slightly true and only at extreme distance. I've seen 1:7 barrels hold 2 MOA at 800 meters with 55 grain. Though they'll handle the 55 grain loads about the same as a 1:9, they'll handle the 75 grain loads much better. Seeing as some of the best match grade and defensive ammo is 75 grain, this is a plus.

    Out at this end, we're back into gas ports. Group "B's" gas ports will typically be larger than group "A's" with all else being equal. This is not a good thing. not only will we have a more violent system, our recoil will be greater (which makes a difference no matter the caliber and how good you are at recoil control - less is less which equates to hits on target faster) and we have a greater potential of failures. Life expectancy is less the higher the pressure.

    Ok, how about high pressure testing and magnetic particle inspection? I'm not going to bore you with the details (my way of saying I have no clue what I'm talking about! ) Group "A" will do these two tests to every single bolt and barrel while group "B" will batch, at best. A simple explanation is this… HPT is using a proof cartridge with 125% NATO standard pressure. MPI is a magnetic test that shows any cracks in the material. Google both for a much more in depth and accurate explanation. For example, KAC does not MPI their E3 bolts. In this case alone, it's acceptable because the bolt itself is a different design and lasts a very minimum of 4 times a standard bolt. There's debate about these tests still being relevant and by all accounts, it is. I'll get into my experiences on this in a bit.

    Now we can look at warrantees. You can reference the "chart" or the manufacturers websites for specifics, but here's my experience. You'll more likely need that warrantee with group "B" than group"A". If something should go wrong with group "A", warranty or not, they'll most likely fix it. KAC just sent me a new front sight for my URX because of something I did during a drill. They never asked for the serial the first time I contacted them. After that, I got to know the guys there.

    Then there's things like anodizing, type II or type III? We want type III, just so you know. Then there's the lower parts kits used. The Stag/RRA/DPMS type kits are almost never consistent. The triggers are far from good, the selectors (on safe) can actually interfere on a small level with the BCG when you work the charging handle. Then there's the charging handle. Believe it or not, this is an important item. I want the best quality charging handle because any skimping here can cause a major failure. Just the other day, a guy posted on m4c that after only a few rounds, the front piece of his CH that has the hole for the gas key and tube snapped off and wedged somewhere around the bolt lugs.





    EDIT - MORE TO COME - Bare with me here as I'm doing family time and trying to sneak in computer time as well…

    Quote Originally Posted by 10thmtn View Post
    *sigh*

    Jon - Your lengthy post reminded me of yet another advantage to the Mini...you don't have to worry about trying to remember all this nonsense.





    Shut up!

    Quote Originally Posted by TSiWRX View Post
    A simple "like" of your post there is just not enough. Great stuff, keep it coming!
    I appreciate that...
    Last edited by jonconsiglio; June 29th, 2011 at 11:29 PM.
    TSiWRX, Cuda66, SIGguy229 and 3 others like this.
    Proven combat techniques may not be flashy and may require a bit more physical effort on the part of the shooter. Further, they may not win competition matches, but they will help ensure your survival in a shooting or gunfight on the street. ~Paul Howe

  14. #29
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,367
    *sigh*

    Jon - Your lengthy post reminded me of yet another advantage to the Mini...you don't have to worry about trying to remember all this nonsense.





    The more good folks carry guns, the fewer shots the crazies can get off.
    www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
    Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger SP101, LCR, Mini 14; Marlin 336 .30-30; Mossberg 500
    CT Lasers

  15. #30
    Distinguished Member Array TSiWRX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio - USA
    Posts
    1,498
    ^ I know you're still working on that, jonconsiglio, but where were you a couple of months ago, when I first started researching ARs? Your one single post above summarized much of what I'd learned reading through the ENTIRE Officer.com AR-buying thread.

    A simple "like" of your post there is just not enough. Great stuff, keep it coming!

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

.556 rifles
,
5.56 carbine
,
5.56 rifle
,

5.56 rifles

,
556 rifle
,
556 rifles
,
best .556 rifle
,
best 5.56
,

best 5.56 rifle

,
best 5.56 rifle for the money
,
best 5.56 rifles
,

best 556 rifle

Click on a term to search for related topics.