Gas vs. Piston

This is a discussion on Gas vs. Piston within the Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I was looking to get a new AR. Actually was going to order a Colt 6721 with a heavy barrel. Got persuaded to get a ...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21
Like Tree7Likes

Thread: Gas vs. Piston

  1. #16
    Member Array jasgo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    213
    I was looking to get a new AR. Actually was going to order a Colt 6721 with a heavy barrel. Got persuaded to get a long piston design Mk116 rifle made by PWS (Precision Weapons System) at a favorite gunshop. Handled one and it was also broken down so I could examine the parts. Weighs a little under 7lbs. All makes of two stage triggers are supposed to fit. I won't get mine for 3-4 months so won't know how it will shoot until then. Seems to be a lot of favorable reviews on it.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #17
    Senior Member Array fernset's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Miami, Fl
    Posts
    502
    Thank you everyone for your input. Muach appreciated.

  4. #18
    New Member Array pmcjuryny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2
    I haven't looked at pistons in a little while but I seem to recall that the parts where not always interchangeable. Maybe someone else can say if this is still the case

    Sent from my ADR6350 using Tapatalk 2

  5. #19
    VIP Member Array jonconsiglio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Corpus Christi, Texas
    Posts
    2,581
    Quote Originally Posted by pmcjuryny View Post
    I haven't looked at pistons in a little while but I seem to recall that the parts where not always interchangeable. Maybe someone else can say if this is still the case

    Sent from my ADR6350 using Tapatalk 2
    You're correct, they are not interchangeable. There's no milspec for them as of now, so each company does it their own way.
    Proven combat techniques may not be flashy and may require a bit more physical effort on the part of the shooter. Further, they may not win competition matches, but they will help ensure your survival in a shooting or gunfight on the street. ~Paul Howe

  6. #20
    Member Array Geronimo45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    159
    Quote Originally Posted by fernset View Post
    Looking to get an AR 15, what should I get. New piston driven or conventional gas driven?
    Pros/cons? Pricing? Availability or parts?

    I don't have any experience with these but have read the piston driven tend to heat up at the foreend but are easier to keep clean and maintain? Opinions?
    Conventional gas system will be cheaper. I wouldn't trust the cheap piston systems. PWS, LWRC, and HK seem to be good choices, but they are expensive.
    If you're putting lots of rounds downrange a year (tens of thousands) you might be better off with a piston system. Since the bolt is mostly protected from gases, parts last much longer than direct impingement systems. This matters with high round counts (more parts replaced more often). Short barrels can run better in a piston system than direct impingement. Once you get shorter than 14", problems start to crop op with DI.
    DI also heats up under the handguards. If you're firing a long string, you should wear gloves... or use a foregrip.

  7. #21
    Member Array jasgo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    213
    Yes, for short barreled AR's, a piston design may have better inherent advantages in terms of reliablity. The carbine versions of the M16/AR15 has the gas bleed closer to the chamber using a short gas tube. The entire recoil/impulse cycle rate is altered from the original barrel/gas bleed length design. For most civilians, probably not a significant factor since usage is a lot different from military applications (i.e. fully automatic firing, continual firing in a firefight). Could be a factor for civilian owners who take intensive rifle courses though.

    After experiencing eroded gas rings and a fractured bolt in a DI carbine, I can't wait to see how cool and clean the PWS I'm waiting for will run. I recommend anyone with a DI rifle to have spare gas rings, gas tube, gas tube pin, and bolt carrier group parts.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Ads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

daniel defense direct impingement
,
daniel defense gas piston ar 15
,
daniel defense piston driven
,
daniel defense piston rifle
,

di vs piston

,
direct impingement vs piston driven
,
gas vs piston driven
,

huldra mark iv review

,
is daniel defense direct impingement
,

piston driven vs direct impingement

,
piston driven vs direct impingement ar 15
,

piston driven vs gas

,
piston driven vs. gas impingement
,
pws mk116 review
,
pws mk116 rifle review