100 round magazine

[ExactlyMyPoint]

Maybe it is me, but I would rather have 3-4 30 round magazines than one 100 round magazine. Just seems easier to control...and why would you NEED a 100 round magazine anyways?

Democratic-senators-offer-gun-control-amendment-for-cybersecurity-bill1.jpg

[DefensiveCarry.com]

[Harvester]

Ditto, the only reason I've ever thought about buying a 100 rd mag was for a range toy. But even then the price always made me reconsider.

[TX expat]

Zombie attack perhaps?

Not that I think "need" should be up for discussion, but I'm assuming that's not your point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[GlassWolf]

Maybe it is me, but I would rather have 3-4 30 round magazines than one 100 round magazine. Just seems easier to control...and why would you NEED a 100 round magazine anyways?

Democratic-senators-offer-gun-control-amendment-for-cybersecurity-bill1.jpg

Why do you NEED a 10 round magazine? Diane Feinstein wants to limit you to 5 shots with a fixed mag.

Welcome to the Democratic Party. Enjoy your stay.

[DontTreadOnI]

Just seems easier to control...and why would you NEED a 100 round magazine anyways?

That's a slippery slope you're standing on my friend.

I hope you were joking.

[Smitty901]

Why would you need more that a single shot rifle. And once we make that the standard why would you need that.
Give it all up one small step at a time.

[DonnieD]

Look at it this way. When I ate my supper last night, I NEEDED the first 1000 or so calories or so to sustain my life. The other 15,000 or so calories I crammed down my gullet were only because I WANTED them. Therefore I ate them. And it was my right to do so. AND, it was no one elses business.

A couple of weeks ago, I bought three 30 round mags for my AR. I didn't NEED them. I bought them because the gun grabbing lunatics don't want me to have them. It is, so far, myright to have them and it is no one elses business.

Now, I guess I'll have to get me one of those 100 round mags as well. Do I need it? Nope. But I'm gonna get it anyway.

Anybody got a problem with that?

Donnie D

[10thmtn]

Too much weight for my liking. And I'm not convinced of their reliability. Heck, I prefer 20-rd mags to the 30-rd ones...easier to get into the prone.

[GlassWolf]

Look at it this way. When I ate my supper last night, I NEEDED the first 1000 or so calories or so to sustain my life. The other 15,000 or so calories I crammed down my gullet were only because I WANTED them. Therefore I ate them. And it was my right to do so. AND, it was no one elses business.

A couple of weeks ago, I bought three 30 round mags for my AR. I didn't NEED them. I bought them because the gun grabbing lunatics don't want me to have them. It is, so far, myright to have them and it is no one elses business.

Now, I guess I'll have to get me one of those 100 round mags as well. Do I need it? Nope. But I'm gonna get it anyway.

Anybody got a problem with that?

Donnie D

I think you used one too many zeros in there my friend. I'm on a 2000-2500 calorie per day diet and that's plenty of food to me. If you eat 20,000 calories in one sitting, well, you must be a rather large guy.. or possibly an elephant.

[MrBuckwheat]

How does the weight of all the bullets affect shooting the rifle. I could see it where it would be fun to just fire off shots at the range. But I could not see using one. I know some have a good feed system and some have spring issues, How do you know whats good and whats not so. I don't believe it is up to the goverment to tell us what we can and can't have!

[WHEC724]

They are a little cumbersome. I've only used mine once - just to test it out, but that is not the point.

I'm sick of the ever-probing questions of which of my possessions do I really need.

[Caertaker]

...and why would you NEED a 100 round magazine anyways? Democratic-senators-offer-gun-control-amendment-for-cybersecurity-bill1.jpg

I need one because I believe that it will make the antis hate me at least three times more.

[QKShooter]

Personally I think that a 93 round capacity magazine would be OK but, absolutely and no way do I see any useful purpose in a 100 round magazine...for civilians.

Now...for legitimate Law Enforcement purposes I think that I would be OK with possibly 106 rounds in one magazine.

I am also OK with hollow-point ammunition as long as the hollow portion is not really really deep...like sort of a shallow hollow would be fine with me.

[NC Bullseye]

This all could be avoided by open carrying a belt fed weapon.

[hellgrammite]

i have a belt fed weapon, i reach down and my belt feeds me my glock 17 everytime.
i agree with WHEC724, what i need or want is my business alone,...... or my wifes.......