Let's beat a dead horse. Mini 14 Tactical vs. DPMS Sportical

This is a discussion on Let's beat a dead horse. Mini 14 Tactical vs. DPMS Sportical within the Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I've been doing a little research on these two weapons. The reason I'm comparing them is their price is within $50 of each other. Same ...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: Let's beat a dead horse. Mini 14 Tactical vs. DPMS Sportical

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array zacii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    arizona
    Posts
    3,742

    Let's beat a dead horse. Mini 14 Tactical vs. DPMS Sportical



    I've been doing a little research on these two weapons. The reason I'm comparing them is their price is within $50 of each other. Same caliber, two different platforms.

    Mini 14 should be easier to maintain
    [IMG][/IMG]

    Sportical should be easier to accessorize
    [IMG][/IMG]
    I've read reports that their both comparable in accuracy at around 200 yards.

    Alot is going to depend on it's uses according to the user. If you want a tack-drivin', prairie dog killin' @ 300 yds +, then I would think the nod would go to the Sportical...

    If you're looking for a plinkin', coyote killin', zombie killin' low maintenance, then I'm thinking that the Mini might suffice.

    Let the barrage begin....
    Trust in God and keep your powder dry

    "A heavily armed citizenry is not about overthrowing the government; it is about preventing the government from overthrowing liberty. A people stripped of their right of self defense is defenseless against their own government." -source

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Ex Member Array Ram Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    13,687
    Personally............(in my opinion) both have their pros and cons (of course), and you might beat the bushes on the internet for a while other than here. I would say you'd probably be better off with the DPMS and some MagPul magazines for it (since I've heard the factory mags are junk). I have nothing for or against either one since I've never had either. It's just what I've heard over the years that causes me to lean away from the Ruger 'Minis' for reasons I'm unable to completely explain. Some law enforcement agencies still employ the Mini 14 for special purposes, and that may seem like one of the good points. I think there are plenty of accessories available for either one actually. You'll just have to hunt around.

  4. #3
    Senior Moderator
    Array HotGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    14,627
    Sportical will be easier to get parts for and they are cheaper. Parts can be had anywhere.

    Mini magazines are had to get, expensive and are made by a very limited number of manufactureres. Everyone makes AR mags.

    Sportical platform is more customizable, Mini is very limited.
    You can change tophalfs on the Sportical, go from a SBR to a 24" barrel with a simple switch. Sportical can host several calibers,Mini...is just Mini.

    Sportical will hold its value,and nearly anyone will buy it, the Mini only has a niche market.

    The Mini has a limited ability for a scope, the Sportical is virtuall unlimited.
    The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it...- George Orwell

    AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
    Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...
    http://bobbailey1959.wordpress.com/

  5. #4
    Member Array Rayman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    columbus
    Posts
    92
    I'm not a big fan of the sportical. I owned one, I don't own it anymore. I am however a fan of AR-15s. I'd suggest spending $100 more and get an entry level AR.

    But if not. I'd go with the mini.

  6. #5
    Senior Member Array jeep45238's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    708
    I'd go with the DPMS. Have you ever tried to detail strip a Mini 14? Still want to call it easier to maintain?
    ~Mike F.
    http://www.ConcealedCampus.com
    http://www.a-human-right.com/
    "Quemadmoeum gladuis neminem occidit, occidentis telum est."

  7. #6
    Senior Member Array jeephipwr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Triangle, NC
    Posts
    607
    I have both and I like them both. But the AR has more going for it in options, use, etc. But I like my mini too. choices, choices.....

  8. #7
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,667
    I used an AR rifle (M16) in the Army. I have a Mini 14 as a civilian.

    Personally, I like the Mini better. I just hate the direct gas system on most AR rifles - blows hot dirty gases right into the action. This was done to reduce weight by eliminating the operating rod. Makes for baked-on crud that is hard to clean.

    I also do not like all the little pieces the AR breaks down into for cleaning - especially the darn cotter pin. Very easy to lose in the field. The Mini breaks down much like an M14 into big pieces. I've never needed to break it down further than field stripping it.

    The AR will likely be more accurate at longer range. It is more adaptable.

    Since I do not envision "defending" myself from someone 200 yards away ("Yes officer, even though he was so far away I had no choice but to shoot him." ), and I like my rifles plain (no optics, lasers, flashlights, cup holders, etc), those are not issues for me.

    Hence, the Mini.
    The more good folks carry guns, the fewer shots the crazies can get off.
    www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
    Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger LCP (2), LCR, Mini 14; Remington 870; Marlin 336 .30-30
    CT Lasers

  9. #8
    VIP Member Array edr9x23super's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,108
    Every Mini-14 I have ever fired never compared in accuracy with any AR, even at 100 yards; people keep bashing the gas system on the AR, but like the 1911s, if you use the weapon within it's design envelope, it is every bit as reliable as any other gun; I prefer the AR because of its ergonomics. Stoner's genius was not in the fact that he designed a light, easy-to-fire weapon but in the fact that hands-down it is still the fastest assault rifle to reload and get back in the fight because of the orientation of the controls....

    But take what I say with a grain of salt - go check it out for yourselves, go to a USPSA 3-gun match and see what the serious competitors are using. That bunch knows real well what works and what doesn't, and they are the ones solely responsible for the cottage industries that have grown up around the AR-15 and 1911 platforms......
    "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined". - Patrick Henry

  10. #9
    Moderator
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    43,796
    Quote Originally Posted by 10thmtn View Post
    I used an AR rifle (M16) in the Army. I have a Mini 14 as a civilian.

    Personally, I like the Mini better. I just hate the direct gas system on most AR rifles - blows hot dirty gases right into the action. This was done to reduce weight by eliminating the operating rod. Makes for baked-on crud that is hard to clean.

    I also do not like all the little pieces the AR breaks down into for cleaning - especially the darn cotter pin. Very easy to lose in the field. The Mini breaks down much like an M14 into big pieces. I've never needed to break it down further than field stripping it.

    The AR will likely be more accurate at longer range. It is more adaptable.

    Since I do not envision "defending" myself from someone 200 yards away ("Yes officer, even though he was so far away I had no choice but to shoot him." ), and I like my rifles plain (no optics, lasers, flashlights, cup holders, etc), those are not issues for me.

    Hence, the Mini.
    You make some excellent points here...thus why I sold my AR-15 and purchased two rifles: A Henry Rifle in .22 mag, and a Marlin 30-30... and plenty of ammo. (Bought both for the price of an AR.)
    I'm happy...
    The last Blood Moon Tetrad for this millennium starts in April 2014 and ends in September 2015...according to NASA.

    ***********************************
    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member[/B]

  11. #10
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,667
    Quote Originally Posted by edr9x23super View Post
    Every Mini-14 I have ever fired never compared in accuracy with any AR, even at 100 yards; people keep bashing the gas system on the AR, but like the 1911s, if you use the weapon within it's design envelope, it is every bit as reliable as any other gun; I prefer the AR because of its ergonomics. Stoner's genius was not in the fact that he designed a light, easy-to-fire weapon but in the fact that hands-down it is still the fastest assault rifle to reload and get back in the fight because of the orientation of the controls....
    I agree with you. Most civilians will never fire enough rounds in a defensive encounter for the direct gas system to become an issue.

    However, that still does not change the fact that this is not an optimal design. It violates the "don't poop where you eat" rule, by "pooping" waste into the feeding/operating system of the rifle.

    As far as accuracy, it's a moot issue, as most civilian defensive encounters will be at very close range. The difference between the AR and the Mini will likely not be a factor.

    The ergonomics on the Mini are pretty good, IMHO. I like that you can see the bolt over the top of the carbine - you're better able to see when your bolt is locked open and you are out of ammo.

    I will concede that the straight up magazine insertion of the AR is faster, versus the rock-it-in of the Mini (and AK, and M1A, and FAL, etc).

    To each his own, but I do prefer the Mini.
    The more good folks carry guns, the fewer shots the crazies can get off.
    www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
    Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger LCP (2), LCR, Mini 14; Remington 870; Marlin 336 .30-30
    CT Lasers

  12. #11
    Distinguished Member Array Rexster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    SE Texas
    Posts
    1,772
    I strongly prefer the ergonomics of the Mini. I am a lefty, and the Mini's safety is ideal for lefties, and the operating rod is perfectly positioned for lefty manipulation. The Mini's stock dimensions fit me perfectly. I don't like to have to remember the offset factor for CQB, due to the AR15's high sight radius over the bore axis, when a Mini-14, my duty/HD shotguns, and duty/HD/CC handguns all have the line of sight right over the bore axis.

    The safety position of the AR15 causes me a crisis of confidence, as I thoroughly indoctrinated myself to NOT "get caught with my dingus down" when shooting certain DA autopistols. Well, with the AR15, in semi-auto mode, the rifle IS ready to fire with the dingus DOWN. Dingus, for those too young to remember, refers to the safety lever. No amount of training can seem to totally give me faith, when my brain goes into primitive fight or flight mode. (Yes, I have been there with an AR15A2 Govt Carbine in my hands.)

    Obviously, these two factors are individual to me, so your "mileage" may vary.

    FWIW, I do like my half-Colt HBAR, for longer-range shooting, but NOT for close-range defensive use. So, I am not taking sides or beating any expired equines. If I had to go to war, and had to choose between a Mini or an AR, I would probably go AR, specifically an M16A2.
    Last edited by Rexster; October 14th, 2009 at 11:35 AM. Reason: clarifications

  13. #12
    Member Array Random's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Clayton NC
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by Rayman View Post
    I'm not a big fan of the sportical. I owned one, I don't own it anymore. I am however a fan of AR-15s. I'd suggest spending $100 more and get an entry level AR.
    What would be some examples of an "entry level AR"?

  14. #13
    VIP Member Array zacii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    arizona
    Posts
    3,742
    Quote Originally Posted by Random View Post
    What would be some examples of an "entry level AR"?
    I thought the Sportical was an entry level AR. It is an AR, just without a dust cover or forward assist.
    Trust in God and keep your powder dry

    "A heavily armed citizenry is not about overthrowing the government; it is about preventing the government from overthrowing liberty. A people stripped of their right of self defense is defenseless against their own government." -source

  15. #14
    Member Array Rayman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    columbus
    Posts
    92
    Quote Originally Posted by zacii View Post
    I thought the Sportical was an entry level AR. It is an AR, just without a dust cover or forward assist.
    This is purely my own opinion. But when I think of an AR, all those little features that the sportical is missing, should be standard. It's like buying a car with no locks. The brass deflector, forward assist and dust cover should all be standard features on an AR.

    Don't get me wrong, if you're looking for something to shoot holes in paper. Then by all means, if you can find a sportical that runs without multiple FTFs, go for it. From my own personal experience, I would not use the sportical for a serious rifle. Although a Mini 14 would not be my first choice, it'll do. Again this is purely my opinion. Heck some people trust their lives to a highpoint...I'm just not one of those people.

    Quote Originally Posted by random
    What would be some examples of an "entry level AR"?
    If we're sticking with DPMS. My local store has PANTHER RFA2-AP4A for $770.

    Stag has their model 3 with no sights, model 1 with. RRA's has their standard A4. DTI (del-ton) is pretty much entry level across the board. All can be had for around $700-$800 range.

  16. #15
    Member Array Random's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Clayton NC
    Posts
    399
    Hmm - maybe a slightly different question, then: How would you define an entry-level AR?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. DPMS Panther A-15 5.56NATO Sportical
    By claybreaker0 in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: June 25th, 2009, 02:18 AM
  2. DPMS 5.56 "Sportical" Opinions
    By bgriffin70 in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 11th, 2008, 10:47 AM
  3. Beating a dead horse...
    By glockstock in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: October 4th, 2008, 11:44 AM
  4. String up that Dead Horse Again
    By Euclidean in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: February 1st, 2006, 03:32 PM

Search tags for this page

dpms panther sportical review
,

dpms sportical

,
dpms sportical 308
,
dpms sportical accuracy
,

dpms sportical review

,
dpms vs mini 14
,
m14 tactical
,

mini 14 tactical

,
mini 14 tactical accuracy
,
mini 14 vs dpms
,
ruger mini 14
,
tactical mini 14
Click on a term to search for related topics.