March 22nd, 2010 10:37 AM
Well sort of.
Originally Posted by razor02097
I would agree that gun destruction "in-and-of-itself" is not a RKBA issue -- were the Anti-RKBA press and Brady/his-dishonor-from-NYC front groups not objecting w/ their "crime-gun", "too-many-guns-on-the-street", etc manta.
However, the demonizing guns (to represent guns as evil or diabolic) is a favorite Anti-RKBA ploy used as a brainwashing drum beat manta to sway the .
I, for one, feel that their action, alone, makes issues such as this part of the battleground for RKBA. As always, YMMV.
So, I feel it would be a mistake to stand by idly while the Antis usurp an issue (however tangent) as an emotional building block for their nonsense position.
I agree that we should not project our arguments as Pro-RKBA, per se. However, IMHO, we need to attack the "demonization" of guns as being poor fiscal policy based on illogical reaction to misinformation and not cede an emotional point to the Antis. They base their strategy on emotional building blocks. Exposing the flaws one-block-at-a-time helps expose the lack of any solid foundation for their position.
I'm just one root in a grassroots organization. No one should assume that I speak for the VCDL.
I am neither an attorney-at-law nor I do play one on television or on the internet. No one should assumes my opinion is legal advice.
Veni, Vidi, Velcro
March 22nd, 2010 11:24 AM
well my stand point on the guns is that of the logical thing... I'm not going to get caught up in emotional side. Just because someone died in a car sitting in a salvage yard doesn't mean I won't pull the window switch I need for my car. Some people wouldn't. When you break down devices you would realize that its all just raw materials metal, plastic, silicon, fiberglass, etc,etc. From the standpoint of device definition a gun is no different then a car is no different then a coffee maker. They are all "things".
My argument is that of people wanting to destroy guns that could be sold for cash to help people that need it! It costs money to destroy them so you are compounding the issue. Not only would the police lose out on the money but it costs more money. How hard is it to understand that?
*Steps down from soapbox*
There is something about firing 4,200 thirty millimeter rounds/min that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
March 22nd, 2010 10:20 PM
On this we agree.
Originally Posted by razor02097
S&W 642 (no-lock) with .38 Spl +P 135 GR Gold GDHP
Glock G31 & G33 with .357 Sig 125 GR. SXT Winchester Ranger
By DaveH in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: October 26th, 2010, 11:28 AM
By Jason Rogers in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: February 27th, 2010, 02:47 PM
By Ricebrnr in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Last Post: January 21st, 2010, 09:56 PM
By Jason Rogers in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Last Post: June 6th, 2009, 08:48 PM
By paramedic70002 in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: November 7th, 2008, 10:07 AM
Search tags for this page
do police sell guns from crimes?
lincoln park mi volients
punishment for us marshals selling stolen firearms
should police sell guns
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors