QKShooter Goes To Court Today.

This is a discussion on QKShooter Goes To Court Today. within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; BUT, JUST TO SIT THERE...NOT ON TRIAL. I had to go down to the Downtown PGH. Courthouse early today as my Wife was subpoenaed to ...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: QKShooter Goes To Court Today.

  1. #1
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,300

    QKShooter Goes To Court Today.

    BUT, JUST TO SIT THERE...NOT ON TRIAL.

    I had to go down to the Downtown PGH. Courthouse early today as my Wife was subpoenaed to testify in a case.
    Naturally, me being the ideal, dream, hubby. I went along with her.

    There were a few criminal cases being heard by the judge before hers was scheduled to be heard.

    The one that really woke me up was a firearm violation case.
    It was interesting.
    (Why did it wake me up? because we had to be there at 8:30 AM & the judge did not even hold court until 10:30 AM)

    Here is how it all went down...I won't mention any names or even the name of the judge.

    A 27 year old white male is in his vehicle rolling down the road.

    A Police Officer notices that there are NO stickers at all on the vehicle windshield.

    He does a legitimate stop & pulls the vehicle over.

    The lone occupant of the vehicle immediately informs the LEO that there is a firearm in the glove box whereupon the officer tells the driver that he is going to secure the weapon & he does.

    The driver is cooperative & passive.

    Just FYI the firearm is discovered unloaded ~ No round in the chamber. ~ No magazine in or with the firearm.

    The officer asks the driver where the magazine for the firearm is and the driver tells the officer that it is on the floor to the rear side of the drivers seat.

    The officer then questions the driver as to why there are no stickers on his windshield.

    The driver states that his windshield was recently broken & produces two pieces of broken windshield glass from the vehicle center console that have legal, valid, current stickers on the glass.

    The officer then asks the driver if he has a Pistol Permit or is legal to carry the firearm.

    The driver tells the officer that he does not have a pistol permit but, is on his way to the pistol range to meet a friend for target shooting.

    There was a shooting range located about 4 miles away & the driver was headed in that general direction.

    In Pennsylvania...it is LEGAL to have a Revolver/Pistol/Long & Shotgun in your vehicle (Without A Permit or License To Carry) provided that the ammunition is separate from the firearm & that the person in the vehicle is headed to or coming back from a Shooting Range.

    The officer decides to check out his story & (on the scene) requests that another back-up officer take a quick run up to the pistol range to check the place out and speak with the friend AKA find out if the kid was really headed there.

    The back-up officer gets to the range.
    The pistol range is closed.
    There is nobody there at all.
    The indoor target range building is locked.
    There is no friend at the range.

    The driver himself stated that he was not a member of the range.

    The driver was not arrested or taken into custody (at the time of the vehicle stop) but, obviously did have a criminal charges filed against him & had to appear in criminal court.

    The handgun was confiscated by the officer at the time of the vehicle stop.

    The driver had legally purchased the handgun a couple of weeks earlier...alleged that he had shot the pistol at that same range on two previous occasions since buying the pistol.

    The factory S&W box was on the back seat of the vehicle and one additional empty magazine for the pistol was located in the factory S&W box.

    The pistol & box and one spare mag were produced as evidence in court.

    To the best of MY knowledge the reason for the criminal charges being filed were that the driver could not have been going to the target range to meet a friend since the range was closed.

    Also that the officer stated the he felt that the loaded magazine was too easily accessible to the driver & the driver also did not have a sporting type (I guess) recreation type firearm permit.

    I'm not quite clear on that as I was distracted when some Alleg Cnty Sheriff brought some handcuffed guy in through the door that I was sitting next to.

    The driver had no past or other criminal history at all or prior convictions. In other words...he was clean.

    I believe that he had a public defender.

    The defendant did have to testify & when asked WHY he did not have a pistol permit even though there would be absolutely no legal reason that he would have been denied one in Pennsylvania...He stated that he did not want to carry a pistol until he had practiced with it for a while & learned how to use it.

    That was a very logical answer but, in PA...he could have just gone for his LTC right away with no range time or testing required (or mandated) & then just not carried his handgun until he thought he was ready to carry it. For whatever reason he decided NOT to do that & no issue was made about that at all.

    Asked WHY he did not have the handgun in the trunk...he stated that he drove a hatchback & felt that the firearm would be more secure in the glove.

    Asked: If he wanted to make the firearm "More Secure" - Was the glove compartment and/or the firearm in a locked condition?

    He answered "No."

    This kid obviously quite scared up on the stand & a double shade of very nervous white.

    There was other incidental stuff included but, I could not remember all of it. You got a pretty good accurate gist of it here though.

    The judge then took a very quick recess & then came back in & basically threw the case out.

    The Judge asked the driver a few last minute questions...Like...Are you employed? ~ Have you ever been in trouble before? - and then Case Over.


    The driver answered the judge in a polite manner.

    The PA statute (which was read aloud in court) only states that the unloaded firearm be in a separate location from the ammunition inside the vehicle & no other required specifics are given.

    It also does not state that any separate magazine needs to be in an unloaded condition or that one or the other needs to be secured in the trunk.

    Actually the unloaded magazine could still be in the firearm as long as the ammunition is not in the same immediate location with it.

    The story continues:

    As it turns out...the members of the range have their own keys to the locked indoor range.

    The officer that went to the range and saw that the building was locked only stayed at the range 5 to 10 minutes total & so the kid Could Have Been meeting his member friend at the range who would have had a key & "said friend" just not arrived yet.

    There was no evidence supporting the fact that he was not going to the range to meet a friend.

    He was asked what time he was to meet his friend at the range...he answered "around 5:00" (which would have been 5:00 PM)

    QKShooter Additions:

    No friend was in court to testify on his behalf.

    The firearm & the box & both magazines were returned to him immediately following the trial and (I'm guessing OUTSIDE the courthouse) since even all LEOs are not allowed to be armed in the courthouse)

    I believe that he was fined $25.00 for not having the stickers on his windshied as required by law.

    A Police Officer (unrelated to that case) & sitting right next to me asked me what I thought about the case while the judge was in quick recess.

    I said I thought it the case should never have come to court.

    The officer (sitting next to me in the peanut gallery) said that he sort of personally believed that the kid was skirting the Legal PA Carry laws and was possibly using the "to & from the range" line as a legal loophole...as there was no additional ammunition in the car & no hearing protection & no friend produced & that nobody normally makes a trip to the range with just one loaded mag full of ammo to target shoot. Those were just quick thoughts that popped into his head & he was not making any legal argument. Since he was not involved in that case no matter really what his thoughts were.

    I should add that the officer had just quietly stated his private "gut feeling personal opinion" and he WAS NOT in any way upset by the way the eventually judge ruled.
    He was in no way involved with that case.

    My gut feeling was also that the driver was not headed to the range at that exact time either.

    Just a sneaking, funny "hunch only" of mine....BUT, that he could have been going there & nobody proved that he was not.

    He also could have purchased additional ammo at the range - or his friend could have been bringing both more ammo & an extra set of muffs for him.
    So that throws out those unofficial opinions also.

    Anyway...That is the way it all went down..."to the best of my recollection" as Hillary Clinton would say.

    All of this does prove one thing.
    That you can be technically/legally "OK" & still get put through some serious legal worry and hassle.

    I would not have wanted to be that young dude today.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,482
    Wow QK - I'll bet that guy was in ''pucker state'' all the way thru.!!

    He was in some ways running a tight rope, depending on how the thing was viewed and probably knew it too. I'd say that from our perspective he was not really doing much wrong. But from a law standpoint he was lucky he was in enough of a grey area.

    Fascinating case and thx for writing it up - interesting to see what happens in such instances.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  4. #3
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    15,935
    Good to hear it got thrown out. Better to let 1 possible criminal get away(this time) than set precedent for all gun owners to be persecuted. If the guy is guilty , he will get into trouble again , I imagine. Anyone here never done something a bit foolish? I know I have.
    "In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson


    Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

  5. #4
    VIP Member Array Bud White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Away - Health Problems
    Posts
    17,353
    Very interesting Hard to say exactly what was going on one way or the other

  6. #5
    Member Array LibertyGal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    127
    The fact that the young man immediately informed the LEO that there was a firearm in the glovebox seems to put a good light on his intentions (of course, sometimes nervous gang-banger-wanna-be's blurt out incriminating statements, too, and if he thought the officer would see it when he went for his registration, he might have just been covering himself).

    Given PA's transport laws, it does sound like he was legit in that aspect, if in fact he was headed to the range. And a lot of ranges do allow members to admit themselves through keys or combinations, so that part could be legit also. His buddy could have been bringing the ammo & eyes&ears since this guy was a beginning shooter.

    In that situation, I would have begged my buddy to take time off work to testify on my behalf - I wouldn't have wanted to take a chance on a conviction of a firearm violation.

    Glad to hear that you'd have your firearm immediately returned in that situation. I sat in on a court case once (not firearm-related) where, even though the defendant was acquitted, he had to petition the court to get his property back which had been admitted into evidence, and it took about 60 days and a follow-up letter to the judge before the DA's office released it.

    How'd your wife's testimony go?

    LibertyGal
    Requiring a license makes it illegal to do something that was lawful before the license was required.

  7. #6
    VIP Member
    Array dr_cmg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    10,808
    How long does one have to get stickers put on a replacement windshield? I don't know about the kid's story of going to the range, but if he wasn't why tell the LEO at all? It appears that the guy was trying his hardest to provide info to the officer. It may be a reminder not to volunteer info.
    George

    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe. Albert Einstein

  8. #7
    Senior Member Array WJP9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    813
    The officers comments were my exact thoughts/questions throughout your entire story---where is the range ammo? Targets? Hearing Protection? I too believe the kid was using the range law as a loop hole....lucky for him it saved his hide! I'm sure his clean record helped the situation. Sounds like one of those "Stupid Kid! Live and learn..." situations. Thanks for the great story!
    -Bill

    "Better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it."

  9. #8
    VIP Member
    Array srfl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    6,870
    I'm sorta glad this went the way it did....I don't think the kid intentionally sent out to do bad.
    USAF: Loving Our Obscene Amenities Since 1947

  10. #9
    Senior Member Array Zundfolge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    516
    Thats sad ... I don't care if he wasn't really headed to the range, the fact that any state in the US requires you to have permission to carry your own property around in your car just disgusts me.


    Here in Colorado if the kid had his piece loaded and in an IWB holster he would have been within the law (CCW without a permit is perfectly legal in your car).

    What a sad state of affairs. :(

  11. #10
    Member Array mkeBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    S.E. Wisconsin
    Posts
    291
    QK, sorry for my ignorance but what are these window stickers that you mentioned for?
    The power of the future is in its ability to inspire the present.

  12. #11
    VIP Member Array Bud White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Away - Health Problems
    Posts
    17,353
    Quote Originally Posted by mkeBob
    QK, sorry for my ignorance but what are these window stickers that you mentioned for?
    Certain states require inspection stickers I'm guess this is what Qk is talking about

  13. #12
    Member Array LibertyGal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by Bud White
    Certain states require inspection stickers I'm guess this is what Qk is talking about
    Yeah, PA requires inspection AND emissions stickers. Just another way to get into your wallet and control your life.

    LibertyGal
    Requiring a license makes it illegal to do something that was lawful before the license was required.

  14. #13
    Member Array mkeBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    S.E. Wisconsin
    Posts
    291
    Thanks Bud and LibertyGal for clearing that up for me.......Bob
    The power of the future is in its ability to inspire the present.

  15. #14
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,300

    SORRY.....Yes

    that would be the vehicle inspection & emission stickers which must be "up to date" & actually on the windshield.
    So the initial stop was a legitimate stop on the part of the LEO.

    This case seems like it would have been an NRA jump in case had the judge ruled differently as (I Think) the MAX penalty would have been 7 years incarceration.

    ALSO: My gut feeling was that the judge knew that he was going to toss it out even before any evidence was presented. He seemed totally bored & disinterested through the entire proceeding.
    Liberty Over Tyranny Μολὼν λαβέ

  16. #15
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,300

    Ok Here It Is:

    Car/Gun law summary

    Title 18 6106. Firearms not to be carried without a license.

    b (EXCEPTIONS)

    4. Any persons engaged in target shooting with rifle, pistol, or revolver, if such persons are at or are going to or from their places of assembly or target practice and if, while going to or from their places of assembly or target practice, the cartridges or shells are carried in a separate container and the rifle, pistol or revolver is unloaded.


    Just guessing that since a pistol magazine does "contain" the cartridges ~ then a pistol magazine would legally be considered to be "a container"
    The exemption does not specifiy what type of container the cartridges or shells must be contained in.


    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Liberty Over Tyranny Μολὼν λαβέ

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. San Diego Court Rules Against Concealed Carry - NRA to Appeal to 9th Circuit Court
    By LanceORYGUN in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: January 6th, 2011, 11:44 PM
  2. In court today
    By jp4240 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: July 23rd, 2009, 01:50 PM
  3. US Supreme Court Over Rules Bush and The World Court (Merged)
    By Sig 210 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: March 28th, 2008, 08:56 PM

Search tags for this page

qkshooter

Click on a term to search for related topics.