Only Keep One: SW 642 or Ruger SP101 2"?
This is a discussion on Only Keep One: SW 642 or Ruger SP101 2"? within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; My vote was for the SP101. I just think it is a better gun. But that's just me....
View Poll Results: Which do you KEEP???
- 52. You may not vote on this poll
Keep the 642
Keep the SP101
Keep both & make it work
December 16th, 2011 09:54 PM
My vote was for the SP101. I just think it is a better gun. But that's just me.
December 16th, 2011 10:18 PM
I have to say keep both, just because.
But, if you've decided that you HAVE to 'lose' one, KEEP THE RUGER. I have heard NOTHING but wonderful things about them. I have a full size .357 with a 2"bbl that fits rather nicely in my pocket- so I know it can be done without having an airweight. Plus, that full frame makes a wonderful difference when firing a .357 round. Let go of the one that is the 'least useful'- the airweight would be harder to keep on target, and holds fewer rounds. (I've shot a couple j-frames and hated them because there was no weight to soak up the recoil)
"Rock and load, lock and roll... what's it matter? FIRE!!"
"Gun control means hitting your target every time."
Please take everything I say with at least one
grain of salt- I am a very
sarcastic person with a very
dry sense of humor.
Search tags for this page
642 or sp101
642 vs sp101
ruger sp101 vs
ruger sp101 vs 642
ruger sp101 vs s&w 642
ruger sp101 vs s&w 686
ruger sp101 vs smith and wesson 642
s&w 642 vs ruger sp101
s&w 642 vs sp101
sp101 vs 642
sp101 vs 686
sp101 vs smith 642
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors