This is a discussion on Sig 229 or glock 27 within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Both are excellent guns. If it was my choice I would go with the Glock for two simple reasons. First and foremost is that the ...
Array
Both are excellent guns. If it was my choice I would go with the Glock for two simple reasons. First and foremost is that the Glock has a lower bore axis. For me I find that it lets me get on target just a bit faster and results in less muzzle flip. Second, for my hand size the trigger pull on the Glock is better.
Array
Well, first, the G26 and G27 have had zero issues with the switch to Gen 4.
The G27 is going to be easier to conceal since it's much smaller. It's also much lighter.
The P229 is one of my favorite firearms. It's a bigger gun, so depending on your frame, you will have to dress around it.
Both are excellent firearms, and I'm sure you'd be happy with either.
Move. Shoot. Survive. ― The "Unofficial" Suarez International Doctrine
“The real man smiles in trouble, gathers strength from distress and grows brave by reflection.” ― Thomas Paine
Array
I bought the glock 27 today. I pick it up on Wensday and look forward to shooting it.
The SIG will have more resale value than the Glock.
It is better to live one day as a lion, than a thousand years as a lamb...
AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
Maker of cool things to shoot
Array
I decided to go with the 27 I looked at the 33 in .357 but the ammo availability was really low in my area. I called several shops that didn't have any plus I heard there on back order ATM. But I dont feel that im settling for the 27. In the future I'm gonna buy a .357 barrel I heard you can load the .357 in the .40 mags.
Last edited by AustinS; February 7th, 2012 at 07:15 PM.
Array
Yes, you can. You bought a good gun.
Posting Permissions
4Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
