True combat pistol
This is a discussion on True combat pistol within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; So, as I'm cleaning the backup Airweight, I start to think-- I really wonder what the best combat pistol would really be. I was in ...
41Likes
-
June 3rd, 2012 10:53 PM
#1
Ex Member
Array
True combat pistol
So, as I'm cleaning the backup Airweight, I start to think-- I really wonder what the best combat pistol would really be. I was in the Army for almost a decade, and always had a Beretta 92F. Good and accurate pistol to say the least. But, the little S&W in my hand got me thinking about what I would really want in an extended combat situations: A. Semi auto; or B. Revolver.
They both have their pros and cons:
Semi-- larger carry; faster reloads; easier to carry mags instead of speed loaders; better second shot with recoil parallel to arm instead of perpendicular.
But, here is what gets me thinking that a revolver might be better-- simple mechanics. There's less chance of grit and dirt causing a jam. They are much easier to take apart and clean and generally speaking, unless you really do some damage to them, they are pretty darn reliable.
I know, I know people are gonna spout the 1911 and so on. I'll take my Kimber or HK45 any day of the week in a fight, but in a lengthy combat scenario, where I'm out in the field for weeks/months at a time, a S&W Model 686 might just top my list.
Am I way off base here?
-
June 3rd, 2012 10:53 PM
Remove Ads
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:01 PM
#2
Distinguished Member
Array
So new to be a pot stirer.
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:02 PM
#3
Ex Member
Array
The Beretta 92F should have never been put into service if you ask me. Contracts are contracts I reckon. Beretta has never been on my want list for anything. What the powers that be decide for our men and women overseas...we have no say.
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:02 PM
#4
Distinguished Member
Array
ua got 4 nice guns and a good outlook on additional possibilities
perhaps not a long as engagement as you describe but today my kimber gold match (1998)
went 98 trouble free rounds at an necpl/idpa match. i dropped a few points with a white target
cause of my old eyes and a white front sight.
as i've noticed about others--that they do not always do as i think they will nor often as they say they will.
this not only makes life interesting, it makes it dangerous too.
For Sale 1985 Toyota Supra. one owner, 82K, will pass inspection, only needs some body/rust patching
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:03 PM
#5
Ex Member
Array

Originally Posted by
21bubba
So new to be a pot stirer.
Just new to the board my friend.
And, what's life without discussion?
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:11 PM
#6
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
pscipio03
Just new to the board my friend.
And, what's life without discussion?
The search feature on this new to you board my friend...
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:16 PM
#7
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Ram Rod
The Beretta 92F should have never been put into service if you ask me. Contracts are contracts I reckon. Beretta has never been on my want list for anything. What the powers that be decide for our men and women overseas...we have no say.
Kool-aid is not the only beverage out there...
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:18 PM
#8
Moderator
Array
Now, if you had been in the Austrian Army...
"That I cannot do."
"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."
***********************************
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:30 PM
#9
Member
Array
All men are equal...CC makes us equal-er.
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:41 PM
#10
VIP Member
Array
A revolver dropped in dirt or gravel can get some debris between the cylinder and frame - jamming it up.
A single action semi-auto can get muck between the hammer and the frame, causing a misfire.
Your best bet for "dropped in muck" reliability is a striker-fired semi auto, or a traditional DA/SA semi-auto design. Fewer places for the muck to get into the works.
And if you're "in the field" for weeks at a time, I hope you have a long gun...
NRA Life Member; Range Safety Officer
www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger LCP (2), LCR, Mini 14; Remington 870; Marlin 336 .30-30
CT Lasers
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:45 PM
#11
Distinguished Member
Array
Can't help but to say it, but a Glock is hands down one of the top combat pistols in existence. You either love them or hate them (and secretly love them). People complain about the grip angle, or that it's ugly
Does a combat pistol have to be pretty? Are you trying to defend yourself in style? I'll admit, I like certain guns for their looks, and I don't think Glock's are ugly, personally. They're simplicity makes them a winner. Consistent trigger pull, no manual safety to have to train to swipe off. Even when you're trained, your thumb could slip and miss the safety. It's happened to me drawing my 1911 on a (paper) target.
So for me, it's Glocks. I'll take an HK, M&P, FNP, or Sig. Even a 1911. A lot of modern day pistols would work great in a combat situation. But Glock's work the best for me.
-
June 3rd, 2012 11:52 PM
#12
Senior Member
Array
-
June 4th, 2012 12:24 AM
#13
Moderator
Array
Here's the geezer take from one who delights in the revolver.
I could happily live with a revolver in the field for weeks and be confident in it's ability to go the distance.
Can't say that there's less chance of dirt or grit causing a jam though. There's actually more opportunity for dirt and grit to get into places where it can cause mechanical difficulties if not an outright non-functioning revolver. It's amazing how well a revolver can still technically function while grimy but they can sure get stiff. Just living in the inside pocket of the chest waders during waterfowl season can introduce a measure of grit that renders the revolver unpleasant to use without at least a quick wipe out with a thumb, finger, or a rag and I don't know where all that grit can come from. Tossed in the mud and then expected to fire and for the cylinder to cycle normally? I wouldn't put my money on it against any of several automatics, of both old and new designs. If one knows his revolver and has a second to clear it of the worst of the grit then he can get by until he can clean it better. If one is desperate he may even be able to manually turn the cylinder by hand if it's too stiff to operate normally but you can see how that isn't the optimal way to use the gun. If there's no time to clear the revolver before the emergency overtakes its user than it may be worth more as an object to be thrown at the threat.
It'd be easy to artificially induce a revolver to fail with just a dab of grit in the right places. Beneath the rims of the cartridge cases of a loaded revolver is one. Beneath the extractor star is another. Between the yoke/crane and the frame is another. The frame slot for the hand and/or the ratchet could be fouled. The front locking bolt could become balky. If the revolver is a model with a shrouded ejector rod then matter in the channel within the shroud can introduce problems. Grit between the cylinder face and the barrel shank can slow things up if not actually tie things up. Any combination of the above could give a person a "merry time" trying to clear in a hurry.
A revolver will function much better in a dirty environment if it is clean and properly lubricated going into such an environment. If it is already crudded up and sticky from a lot of shooting with no proper cleaning performed then the grit with gather and will be more difficult to disperse with field expedient methods. This is compounded if the revolver is dry and unlubed or not properly lubed (leave the grease out of it).
I could get a revolver operating relatively smoothly in the duck blind after it's been dropped on a gritty, muddy, gravelly beach. In an emergency it even could be sloshed around in the water. If I needed to remove the cylinder or side plate in the duck blind though (never has been necessary) then I'm out of luck. I never remember to keep a tool with a screwdriver on my person.
I'm familiar with several automatics: Colt 1911, Browning Hi-Power, Glock, SIG, even the Luger. Nearly any automatic suitable for service or self-protection has a simple method of field-stripping that may be discerned even if one is unfamiliar with the design and no tools are required. Other than opening the cylinder, the revolver cannot be taken apart without tools. It is something to consider.
It's not important to me hunting, fishing, or hiking so I love my revolvers. I've seen my favorite revolver get pretty nasty. It's amazing what a revolver can withstand and still functionally serve its user. But if I was called to go help out in Afghanistan where my son is currently deployed and allowed to carry the sidearm of my choice, I'd pack the 1911. Some may laugh but I'd tote it in the current issue flap holster rather than something fancy. I can't recall the holster's model designation but I have one around the house. One of the contractors is, or was just down the road from me.
Civilian concealed carry? The revolver is great. Real combat? Choose the right automatic.
“No possible rapidity of fire can atone for habitual carelessness of aim with the first shot.”
Theodore Roosevelt, The Wilderness Hunter, 1893
-
June 4th, 2012 06:00 AM
#14
Senior Member
Array
I love revolvers.
I love 1911s.
I detest the M9/Beretta 92. It's completely irrational, I know. I shoot pretty OK with it - well enough for expert, but that's no huge bragging rights. I think it's all because the M9 meant goodbye 1911. What do you think, darling? Should I hate him?... No, I'm sure of it, I hate him.
I think the best combat handgun probably ought to be a high-cap autoloader. Everything ought to be polymer or stainless (parkerized/coated as required), and it needs to be easy to strip down in the field with minimal tools and limited light to a far enough point to get water/crud out all the crevices. What kind? Just not the M9.
-
June 4th, 2012 07:29 AM
#15
VIP Member
Array
Never a revolver as your primary combat pistol. I carried a Sig for 15 years as my primary and it holds up to everything that was demanded of it. Same for the Glocks. Beretta is a fine weapon for an EDC if you are a big enough guy to conceal it well but would not use it as personal choice for combat pistol (which I did not LOL. In fact, given a choice not one person selected a Beretta over the Sig 228 and Glock)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
best combat handgun
, best combat handgun 2012
, best combat pistol
, best combat pistol 2012
, best combat sidearm
, best fighting handgun
, best fighting handguns
, best fighting pistol
, best fighting pistols
, best polymer combat pistol
, combat revolvers
, good combat pistol
, the best combat pistol
, what is the best combat pistol
, what's the best combat pistol