poor .40 S&W

This is a discussion on poor .40 S&W within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by PEF Don't worry, I like the .40... So do I....

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26
Like Tree10Likes

Thread: poor .40 S&W

  1. #16
    Distinguished Member Array Jason Storm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,211
    Quote Originally Posted by PEF View Post
    Don't worry, I like the .40...
    So do I.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #17
    Distinguished Member Array Once's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    1,544
    I beat up on mine at least once a month

  4. #18
    mkh
    mkh is offline
    Distinguished Member Array mkh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Foxhole somewhere in Jacksonville
    Posts
    1,603
    I've never seen a gun I didn't like.

  5. #19
    VIP Member Array peckman28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    2,074
    Plenty of people like the .40, otherwise it wouldn't be so easy to find anywhere that sells ammo. Shoot what you like. I like my SIG P229, in .40 no less.

  6. #20
    Ex Member Array Doodle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Tomball TX
    Posts
    948
    Quote Originally Posted by Nebraska12 View Post
    Geez....here we go again.

    Here, let's sum it up: 9 can "pretty much" to what a 40 can and the 40 can "pretty much" do what a 45 can. Advocates of the 45 will say, then why not go with a 45. Supporters of the 9mm will say, well the 9 is cheaper, why not just stick with it then. Those that like 40, will say 40 is a good mix of mass & velocity, while the 9 is about velocity and the 45 is about mass. It's a happy medium. People will beat there chests to say the 45 is a man's round and others will say 9mm is effective and they get the advantage of capacity. And finally, some will say, "the 40 is too snappy, it hewts my we wittle hands".

    So, get what you like and shoot it until you proficient. That's pretty much the gist of it.:) lol
    Reading this made my day...hillarity!

  7. #21
    Senior Member Array Spidey2011's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    887
    I have all three. 9, .40, & .45. I prefer the .45, but that's just me. My G21 and 1911 have significantly less recoil than the .40 or even the 9mm. I can make pretty fast headshots on Zombie targets all day long with either one. Running the .40 it takes me about twice as long for follow-ups, but it IS a sub-compact.

    I carry all of my guns in different situations, and I don't feel the least bit under-gunned with any of them. Personally, I feel the .40 is a caliber best suited for a hunting sidearm, which is where mine gets the most use.

  8. #22
    Member Array Pioneer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    NW Oregon
    Posts
    320
    Google: "your gun sucks" which bashes just about every known gun and caliber.
    Sui juris
    U.S. Navy Veteran '65-'69
    Retired Police Detective '71 - '01
    LEOSA Certified
    NRA Life Member / SAF Member
    U.S. Constitution (c) 1791, All Rights Reserved.

  9. #23
    New Member Array CCWFaraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    3
    caliber wars need to stop... :(

  10. #24
    Member Array Nebraska12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Omaha Metro
    Posts
    478
    Quote Originally Posted by CCWFaraz View Post
    caliber wars need to stop... :(
    Holy smokes....isn't that the truth. Problem is, it never will as long as there are new folks getting into shooting. Which is a good thing. A necessary evil I suppose?

    I still do research on different calibers. Difference is, I do the research myself and form an educated opinion based on my own wants and needs. For instance, right now, I'm reading what I can about the performance of .357 Sig.
    'Fortes Fortuna Juvat'
    NRA Member
    NRA Life of Duty Member

  11. #25
    Ex Member Array bmglock23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Charleston SC
    Posts
    99
    Quote Originally Posted by Nebraska12 View Post
    And finally, some will say, "the 40 is too snappy, it hewts my we wittle hands".
    I call them the Nine Nancies. For target shooting alone I'd definitely get a Nine. Or a 22LR. But when defense is an issue, I want something that hits home, even if I'm not as accurate with it. It really doesn't matter which part of the lung I blow away. G23 for me.

  12. #26
    VIP Member Array ghost tracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ky Backwoods
    Posts
    4,125
    The .40 S&W would be a much more effective stopper if it had just been named the 10mm TSM "Tactical Short Magnum". I can't believe the marketing guys at Smith & Wesson gave up so much POWER with such a simple...name!
    There are only TWO kinds of people in this world; those who describe the world as filled with two kinds of people...and those who don't.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

.40 poor round

,

40 s&w stopper

,

s&w 1791

Click on a term to search for related topics.