A Rifle in Every Pot
This is a discussion on A Rifle in Every Pot within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; There are worse things they could mandate eh? To be honest, I'd rather live in a place that mandates gun ownership, rather than one that ...
November 28th, 2012 05:52 PM
There are worse things they could mandate eh? To be honest, I'd rather live in a place that mandates gun ownership, rather than one that tries to remove guns (like say...Chicago and NYC). Kennesaw, GA has had their mandatory law on the books since 1982 as the article says, and they haven't enforced it, but crime rates dropped sharply after it was enacted, and still remain lower than the surrounding suburbs of Atlanta.
It's already been proven that gun owning, law abiding citizenship leads to less crime.
Just because they pass a law mandating it, doesn't mean they have to enforce it. If it's a well known law on the books for said town, it works in their favor.
Glock 26 XD9sc
Ruger SR9c Ruger LCP
November 28th, 2012 05:52 PM
November 28th, 2012 06:40 PM
Originally Posted by Echo_Four
I have the right to remain silent....but according to my old lady, not the ability.
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
Guns are like sex and air...its no big deal until YOU can't get any.
November 29th, 2012 05:03 PM
I think the point of the article was to examine if an entire town was legally armed, would that deter crime?
As to the government forcing me to own a gun - IDK.
US Air Force, 1986 - 2007
"To disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them..." George Mason
December 10th, 2012 11:08 AM
Worth noting in this thread that Vermont is looking at creating a fine for not owning a firearm. $500 to be included in the registry of people that do not own a firearm seems funny, until you understand that this will give the government a list of people not to visit if/when they decide to start grabbing guns.
I wouldn't say this violates any right since it falls right in line with the 10th Amendment. It isn't detailed in the Constitution whether or not one must own a gun so it is left to the states. In this case the state appears to be stepping to the plate to regulate that which the Constitution leaves to them.
"The only people I like besides my wife and children are Marines."
- Lt. Col. Oliver North
December 10th, 2012 03:13 PM
Two thoughts came to me when I read this sentence. The first was "Duh."
As David Kopel noted in a 2001 article in The Arizona Law Review, burglars report that they try to avoid homes where armed residents are likely to be present.
The second was, "Try to avoid,"? Are they sometimes forced to rob homes where they know armed residents are likely to be present?
"Your mind is the weapon, all the rest are just tools." --gasmitty
December 10th, 2012 04:20 PM
In Texas it's not a requirement or law that everyone have and keep firearms.
It's just part of the Culture and Tradition of this State.
Graduate: University of South Vietnam-
School of Jungle Warfare
CURRAHEE My Brothers In Blood
December 10th, 2012 05:23 PM
While I don't care for the thought of "requiring" firearm ownership, I do like the idea of encouraging communities to embrace it.
Search tags for this page
a chicken in every pot and some pot for every citzen
Click on a term to search for related topics.