This is a discussion on List of executive actions Obama plans to take as part of anti-gun violence plan within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by Richard58 If the store closes or stops FFL for waht ever reason then they are required to turn all federal forms into ...
"The gun is the great equalizer... For it is the gun, that allows the meek to repel the monsters; Whom are bigger, stronger and without conscience, prey on those who without one, would surely perish."
Obamacare regulations will have the biggest chokehold on our rights than any other government program ever implimented. It will control everything. It's a monster. Look how the President is already tying laws into that have nothing to do with healthcare...and he hasn't even been inagurated yet.
Retired USAF E-8. Avatar is OldVet from days long gone. Oh, to be young again.
Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... "For What It's Worth" Buffalo Springfield
JeanLouise knows what she is saying here: an LPN or RN will do what they are required to do to protect that license.
I'm in favor of gun control -- I think every citizen should have control of a gun.
1 Thess. 5:16-18
“We will make it easier to keep guns out of the hands of criminals by strengthening the background check system.”
“These are a few of the 23 executive actions that I’m announcing today. But as important as these steps are, they are in no way a substitute for action from members of Congress. To make a real and lasting difference, Congress, too, must act — and Congress must act soon. And I’m calling on Congress to pass some very specific proposals right away.”
“First: It’s time for Congress to require a universal background check for anyone trying to buy a gun. (Applause.) The law already requires licensed gun dealers to run background checks, and over the last 14 years that’s kept 1.5 million of the wrong people from getting their hands on a gun. But it’s hard to enforce that law when as many as 40 percent of all gun purchases are conducted without a background check. That’s not safe. That’s not smart. It’s not fair to responsible gun buyers or sellers.
Second: Congress should restore a ban on military-style assault weapons, and a 10-round limit for magazines. (Applause.) The type of assault rifle used in Aurora, for example, when paired with high-capacity magazines, has one purpose — to pump out as many bullets as possible, as quickly as possible; to do as much damage, using bullets often designed to inflict maximum damage.”
”If it were, we’d already have universal background checks. The ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines never would have been allowed to expire.”
“Ask your member of Congress if they support universal background checks to keep guns out of the wrong hands. Ask them if they support renewing a ban on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines."
"...with liberty and justice for all..."
(Must be 18. Void where prohibited. Some restrictions may apply. Not available in all states). - D. Stanhope
Tactical Shooting Academy & Custom Shop
The only way to ensure that all gun sales from X date forward are approved by the US Government (and not all will be), is to have a registry of who owns what as of that date. I know that you don't like this logic, but there is no other way to know that all sales go through a background check.
It seems that you may be one of those people who actually believe it when the IRS agent comes in and says "Hi, I am from the government, I am here to help." I am not one of those people. Neither were the FF.
It's the Land of Opportunity, not the Land of Entitlements - Vote America!!!
"When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny." Thomas Jefferson
You are only paranoid until you are right - then you are a visionary.
Reader, suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But, I repeat myself. ...Mark Twain: Manuscript note, c.1882.
NRA Life Member & JPFO Member.
Sig & CZ-aholic, a Ruger SP101 3" & Wiley Clapp GP100
Discussed some of this with my wife last night. Told her if any doctor asks her about guns in the home to tell the doc that it's none of his/her f#@*%@g.
The other question - "Do you feel safe in your own home"? - she's free to answer.
"gettin' there is half the fun."
anything from a physically abusive drunk son, to an inability to get help after a fall. It is a reasonable
question to ask, especially of women and the elderly, of the very poor too. Sometimes these problems
can be sorted out with simple solutions, and sometimes the answer might reveal a mental health problem residing
in the patient, for example an answer may indicate paranoia. I see nothing wrong with the second question.
If the Union is once severed, the line of separation will grow wider and wider, and the controversies which are now debated and settled in the halls of legislation will then be tried in fields of battle and determined by the sword.
When I'm asked that question I plan to answer, "no".
Don't kill the messenger. The doctor probably doesn't want to ask that any more than you want to answer it.
Take your anger to the source of this debacle.
We don't need more gun laws, we need more gun safes.
Most if not all of the kids with weapons would find it difficult to drag a safe to school. Parents wise up and start being responsible for your weapon AT ALL TIMES.