To be fair to teachers everywhere, these were "officials" from the district ... not educators who would be armed with the duty to protect our kids.
But they, they are the ones twisting the minds of us all who are trying to wrap our heads around the concept of calling a 5yr old child a "terroristic threat" for wanting to blow soap bubbles at another.
"Beam me up, Scotty. There's no intelligent life here."
I'm just waiting for the first "media" article to come along that talks about people having (or lacking) common horse sense, in which the spelling's a mite off. Such as: "common horse scents." Manure's the word. Piles and piles of it.
That's uneducated people for you, if they think she's a Terrorist threat they should be fired for being dumb. I would sue the officials like no tomorrow. Make an example of them.
...the teacher could have prevented this nonsense...by saying "put that away, dear"...unless she was afraid that the powers that be might fire her...the educational system is full of folks playing defense...
Ok, I think I'm in need of some clarification, so please correct me if I'm wrong. Exactly how many bubbles per minute does a pink bubble gun have to shoot to be considered an assault weapon,....
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Defensive Carry
5.4M posts
117.5K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to defensive firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about everyday carry, optics, holsters, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!