This is a discussion on CT Bill 122, ONE SHOT MAX! within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by smolck Coulda told ya that a long time ago! Down here we understand the constitution and also how to play winning football ...
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.
That is unbelievably stupid!
ALWAYS CARRY - NEVER TELL
Friend of Bill
I'd like to ask the moron that proposed this piece of crap how he would feel holding a single shot weapon while 4 armed thugs broke in his front door and stormed his family at 2:00 am. "Now hold on there Mr. Home Invaders, stand there and take your shots like you're supposed to. Now where'd I put my second bullet?"
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
2. He seems to be of the opinion that at least when the law-abiding citizen is murdered, those criminals would have gained access to a firearm with only a single shot capacity. He places the incidental byproduct of a murder to be more important than the murder itself.
The solution to this is to fund the discovery of a cure. It also reduces the total amount of family that has to go through it.
And to think the American Revolution started in the northeast.
When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.
"Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."
It started in the Northeast - that's why they are more advanced and know better than everyone else.
It was the "shot" heard round the world....remember? Not "shots"....
It could work. You would have to do a New York reload 6 Times . holster makers would get rich making 7- gun rigs.