This is a discussion on CT Bill 122, ONE SHOT MAX! within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Originally Posted by smolck Coulda told ya that a long time ago! Down here we understand the constitution and also how to play winning football ...
"To reject the notion of expertise, and to replace it with a sanctimonious insistence that every person has a right to his or her own opinion, is silly."
That is unbelievably stupid!
ALWAYS CARRY - NEVER TELL
Friend of Bill
I'd like to ask the moron that proposed this piece of crap how he would feel holding a single shot weapon while 4 armed thugs broke in his front door and stormed his family at 2:00 am. "Now hold on there Mr. Home Invaders, stand there and take your shots like you're supposed to. Now where'd I put my second bullet?"
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
2. He seems to be of the opinion that at least when the law-abiding citizen is murdered, those criminals would have gained access to a firearm with only a single shot capacity. He places the incidental byproduct of a murder to be more important than the murder itself.
And to think the American Revolution started in the northeast.
When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.
"Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."
Hóka-héy! Crazy Horse
It started in the Northeast - that's why they are more advanced and know better than everyone else.
It was the "shot" heard round the world....remember? Not "shots"....
It could work. You would have to do a New York reload 6 Times . holster makers would get rich making 7- gun rigs.