This is a discussion on Companies taking a stand over 2A rights , refusing to sell to LE, etc. in states within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Wondering if Holder will have their Licenses pulled for discriminating......................Hmmm....
Wondering if Holder will have their Licenses pulled for discriminating......................Hmmm.
I don't see that list of manufacturers/retailers being a significant portion of the government tactical requirements. Now if Colt, Glock, S&W and such get on that bandwagon, it will sure have an impact. I appreciate their statements though, but I fear it's one shovelfull of dirt trying to fill a large hole in individual rights' violations.
Retired USAF E-8. Official forum curmudgeon.
Lighten up and enjoy life because:
Paranoia strikes deep, into your life it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... Buffalo Springfield - For What It's Worth
TO ME, this smells more of a publicity stunt (sales and loyalty generation) than anything else. I mean, really, most of these companies sales to LE and/or government sources are basically non-existant to start with. Also, any supply of arms or ammo to LE and government lost to these companies will be quickly be made up for by other companies both in the US and abroad. Money speaks louder than ideals for most businesses.
Just the same, I do admire their spunk!
I Shoot Birds With A Canon.