NY Times Article: Police say don't be passive if shoting starts
This is a discussion on NY Times Article: Police say don't be passive if shoting starts within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; This article builds on the "run, hide, fight" approach, but is interesting because it acknowledges that "people at the scene of an attack have a ...
1Likes
-
1
Post By AZJD1968
-
April 7th, 2013 12:52 PM
#1
Member
Array
NY Times Article: Police say don't be passive if shoting starts
This article builds on the "run, hide, fight" approach, but is interesting because it acknowledges that "people at the scene of an attack have a better chance of survival if they take an active stance rather than waiting to be rescued by the police," and (in the case of the Virgina Tech killer) "it was clear that the Virginia Tech assailant had 'one goal, and that seemed to be to kill as many pole as possible before ending his life.'"
Maybe some people really are starting to get a clue that you can't just pretend that there aren't bad people who do evil things, and then tell themselves that "it only happens elsewhere." That type of understanding could eventually lead people down the path of firearms being helpful tools and concealed carry as a useful deterrent (as well as effective means of protection in many cases). Who knows, maybe someday people will even acknowledge that just because you have a "no guns" sign you aren't any safer, and indeed are probably less safe. One can only hope.
Latest news
-
April 7th, 2013 12:52 PM
Remove Ads
-
April 7th, 2013 02:21 PM
#2
Member
Array
If you are in NY you don't have many options, perhaps run and hide. Not so much fight unless you throw chairs.
-
April 7th, 2013 02:21 PM
#3
VIP Member
Array
Prayer and pixie dust hasn't ever worked well, on the instance violence finds us. I just wonder how much more proof folks need, before they'll lift a finger in actual, active defense of themselves when S begins to HTF.
Trending toward rationality? Perhaps, though there are still tens of millions of head-in-sand'ers out there. It's nice to see some police agency, though, refusing to simply parrot the party line about the "pixie dust" approach. Certainly, the boost in concealed-carry licensing training that's going on is a decent indicator of some rationality occurring.
Here's to hoping some people are getting it, at long last.
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
Thoughts: Justifiable self defense.
Explain: How does
disarming victims
reduce the number of victims?
Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
NRA, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

-
April 7th, 2013 03:04 PM
#4
Senior Member
Array
Maybe, The New York Times could write an article to the law makers of their state saying, " If you suggest that we be active during a mass shooting, maybe you can abolish some laws so that we can have weapons to be active with."
Stop whining and go make a difference!
If you think that I may be talking to you, then I am.
-
April 7th, 2013 05:01 PM
#5
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
sigs
If you are in NY you don't have many options, perhaps run and hide. Not so much fight unless you throw chairs.
Don't forget, you can always blow your whistle! Blow your whistle!!!
Regards,
Jim

NRA Life Member
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
new york times police say don't be passive if shooting stars
, police say don't be passive if shooting starts
, police say dont be pasdive if shooting starta
, police say dont be passive if shooting starts
, police say dont be passive if shooting starts what is it about
, police say don?t be passive if shooting starts