Pretty damned irresponsible.
This is a discussion on Oregon Sheriff's Office Surprise 'Shooting Drill' to Test School's 'Readiness' within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I find it amusing how FOX News: Surprise shooting drill shocks teachers at Oregon school words it like this: Teachers attending a meeting at a ...
I find it amusing how FOX News: Surprise shooting drill shocks teachers at Oregon school words it like this:
Where as the link to the original at Oregon Live: Gunfire and moments of fear as a rural Oregon school tests its readiness clearly paints a more accurate picture:Teachers attending a meeting at a small school in rural Oregon last Friday were shocked when two masked men wearing hoodies burst into the conference room and pretended to open fire.
"Pretending to open fire" and "opening fire [with blanks]" are very different (hearing gunshots in the distance being the important part). Either way the idea is stupid. Had this been somewhere like Texas, I can about assure you there's a good chance that the 'BG' would have been injured if not killed by a faculty member.Two masked men wearing hoodies and wielding handguns burst into the Pine Eagle Charter School in this tiny rural community on Friday. Students were at home for an in-service day, so the gunmen headed into a meeting room full of teachers and opened fire.
I'm fairly sure if any one of us tried to do this, "in order to test the readiness of our children's school" would be facing some serious jail time.
Pretty damned irresponsible.
Wow, the things you can get away with in a GFZ!!
In a related thread, man OCs in an Oregon school. Man Legally OCs at a School, No One Freaks Out...
If he or someone else who was armed had been there and BGs were only shooting blanks, this could have turned out very badly.
We are prepping for an active shooter drill at my workplace. I work in a Federal building and so far we have involved the Memphis SWAT, Federal Protective Service, US Marshals, with a seperate notice sent to everyone else in building that has access to a weapon. For example, probation officers do not carry in the building, but they have weapons they carry when they go out on interviews. Those weapons are in a gun safe, but are in their office space.
If someone did something stupid like that here, they would most likely end up dead.
I have a hobby. I have the world’s largest collection of sea shells.
I keep it scattered on beaches all over the world. Maybe you’ve seen some of it.
-- Steven Wright
1950 Colt .38 Police Positive Special
2013 SCCY 9mm CPX-2 Stainless Steel
US Army 1973-1977, 95B
But it begs the question: what would appropriate drills look like, to realistically test and evaluate a school staff's preparedness to deal with such emergencies?
A couple of things:
1)Fox didn't mention the fact that the students were not present. This rachets up the outrage irresponsibly. (The press on both sides really do a diservice by ommision))
2)As others have pointed out, someone could have easily ended up dead from someone carrying. There are a number of people who would rather get fired than be unprotected(ie. armed)
3)Now teachers are going to be hesitating in their reactions not knowing if it's just another drill. This can have the oposite effect then intended.
"Teachers attending a meeting at a small school in rural Oregon last Friday were shocked when two masked men wearing hoodies burst into the conference room and pretended to open fire.
The surprise shooting drill at Pine Eagle Charter School in Halfway was designed to test the school's preparation for an assault by "active shooters," The Oregonian reported.
Principal Cammie DeCastro told the paper there was "some commotion" when the shooters, who were actually members of the school's staff, entered the meeting room and began shooting.
Students were at home for a faculty training day, according to the report.
School staff had received training from the Union County Sheriff's Office on active shooting scenarios, but many educators were caught by surprise and unprepared to handle the situation, according to The Oregonian.
Elementary teacher Morgan Gover told the paper that only two of her colleagues would have survived the shooting. She said she took several fake direct hits from the shooters.
"I'll tell you, the whole situation was horrible," she told the paper. "I got a couple in the front and a couple in the back."
DeCastro told the paper that some community members have criticized the drill, but she maintains the scenario was valuable.
The district plans to evaluate existing security policies and procedures and decide what steps should be taken in response to the drill, according to DeCastro.
"The pistol, learn it well, carry it always ..." ~ Jeff Cooper
"Terrorists: They hated you yesterday, they hate you today, and they will hate you tomorrow.
End the cycle of hatred, don’t give them a tomorrow."
Shooting fish in a barrel...
What did they expect? Two armed gunmen walk into a meeting of 15 seated targets and unload into them.
Just a ploy on the anti-gun morons to take away more of our 2nd amendment rights.
I am sure the point of the drill was to show how much safer you are by cowardly hiding behind a desk.
Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around laws. Plato
Darwin had it backwards.
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools." - Thucydides
According to the news articles, the Union County sheriff's department had conducted earlier preparedness training with the school's staff. But the town is in Baker County. The article doesn't specify which sheriff's department did the "active shooter" drill, at the school.
In defense of the Sheriff and the school's administration, apparently the training and planning had been fairly pro-armed guards/staff, fairly rational as to the practical options that face faculty in situations that could arise, particularly in such a remote facility as theirs.
Originally Posted by Oregonian article
This was a much more positive thing than many are giving it credit for. It was done is a way that didn't put any students at risk, and raised awareness among the staff that a school is not a "safe zone." They are very vulnerable, and now they know it and can adjust accordingly.
And line ccw9mm said, Baker County is a very gun-friendly place. My wife is from there, and I spend more than my fair share of time there. It's a place where you can carry your rifle to the hardware store/gun shop (yes, they're the same place) to get it sighted in, and nobody will bat an eye. I've OC'd at the Baker Stampede without incident, as well. There's no reason to think that this is an "anti plot."
The article I first read did not mention that the kids were off. I'm not sure if I read the linked article here or off of Drudge which has since changed which news source it's quoting for the story now. My appologies to FOX and everyone here if I was incorrect as seems to be the case.
Only in Oregon or California could officials be 100% certain that no faculty would have been carrying. As mentioned above, had it been in a pro-gun state, someone would have most certainly been killed!
And, just FYI, for the time being, concealed carry is legal in all schools in OR with a CHL.