FOID poll

This is a discussion on FOID poll within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; This kind of stems from another thread, and I figured I'd start a new one to get peoples opinion on the subject instead of getting ...

View Poll Results: Is the FOID unconstitutional?

Voters
86. You may not vote on this poll
  • It is unconstitutional.

    75 87.21%
  • It is not unconstitutional.

    11 12.79%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: FOID poll

  1. #1
    Distinguished Member Array Pro2A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,933

    FOID poll

    This kind of stems from another thread, and I figured I'd start a new one to get peoples opinion on the subject instead of getting off topic on the other thread. I just want to get a show of hands here who thinks the FOID card is unconstitutional. Why or why not?

    My opinion is simple its a permit for a right. Citizens shouldn't need permits (permission) for rights i.e. CCW or in Illinois case, the FOID card. I think Vermont has the right idea. It would be like having to get a permit to speak freely, or for due process.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunowners.org
    The Second Amendment guarantees that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." This means that law-abiding citizens should not need to beg the government for permission to carry a firearm. That would turn the "right" to bear arms into a mere "privilege." Likewise, one should not have to be photographed, fingerprinted, or registered before they can exercise their Second Amendment rights. Criminals certainly do not jump through these "hoops." The Second Amendment is no different than any of the other protections enumerated in the Bill of Rights. That is, honest citizens should not need a government issued permission slip; rather, they should be able to carry as a matter of right.

    What does everyone else think?

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member Array Sheldon J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Battle Creek, Mi.
    Posts
    2,285

    Hummm...

    Well unfortunately although it states "shall not be infringed" it does not say we will not stop the states from keeping an eye on you.

    Unconstitutional maybe but that would be a very long hard fight, and me I just do not mind jumping though the hoops as it adds a degree of legitimacy to my CCW.

    In the long run the training and background checks make us look less like nut cases to the anti gunners (whom most of which could not pass) when we post the argument of the criminals and their intent, and give us a legal status in the eyes of the court.

    Do I like the government having a record of my CCW M not really comfortable with it. No more than the AKA registration "Safety inspection" we have to do here in Mi just to buy a hand gun.
    "The sword dose not cause the murder, and the maker of the sword dose not bear sin" Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac 11th century

  4. #3
    Member Array 500Mag's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    Posts
    418
    I too am all for the Vermont/Alaska standard. In practice Alaska is better because you don't need a permit to carry but can get one for reciprocity reasons with the less free states.

    Personally, I have a hard time distinguishing the difference between someone being able to own a firearm (ie. anyone not a felon, etc.) and someone's ability to carry (48 states allow to varying degrees, 2 don't). To me its either a can or can't with no middle ground. Does carrying instantly turn someone into a crazed criminal? I don't think so.

    I'd like to hear other's theory on this.
    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

  5. #4
    VIP Member Array Supertac45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Michigan's U.P.
    Posts
    3,657
    It's another form of control by the goverment.
    Les Baer 45
    Sig Man
    N.R.A. Patron Life Member
    M.C.R.G.O.

  6. #5
    VIP Member Array Tubby45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Making ammo.
    Posts
    3,047
    "No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, or charge a fee therefore."

    Murdock v PA 1943

    The only thing I like about having a CPL and FFL is that my prints are taken. If evil should find me, they can at least ID my body when they run my prints through AFIS. Trying to be optimistic.

  7. #6
    VIP Member Array aus71383's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    2,543
    +1 Liberty violation = unconstitutional IMO

    Austin

  8. #7
    Senior Member Array MR D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    South Central PA
    Posts
    864
    which constitution??

    the FOID is usually state issued and therefor is a matter for the state constitution...



    I still believe it is unconstitutional and wrong and that is how I voted but...


    IMHO the federal constitution only reserves our rights for us on a federal level not on a state level...

  9. #8
    VIP Member Array Tubby45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Making ammo.
    Posts
    3,047
    But the 14th Amendment applies the Bill of Rights to the states.

  10. #9
    Senior Member Array walvord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    St. Charles County Missouri
    Posts
    991
    I voted "unconstitutional" - but then again the PRI is hopeless. The voters just keep voting in the communists and socialists and that is why they've got what they got. Demographics plays a part in this scenario as, like has been said, VT has no form of license for carrying or otherwise and AK has a license if you want to apply for one. There isn't any shootouts at the o.k. corral in either of those states. In Chicago, it's vote early and vote often. Maybe Ontario could annex Chicago somehow. They would be a lot more comfortable there.
    The most exhilarating thing in life is getting shot at with no results.
    - Winston Churchill
    Endowment Life Member - NRA
    Life Member - GOA
    Member - Oath Keepers, SAF, CCRKBA
    U.S. Army (72G) 1975-1980

  11. #10
    VIP Member Array SIGguy229's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Kommie-fornia-stan
    Posts
    7,045
    I don't like the fact you have to wait 30+ days to get a FOID.

    Either get rid of it altogether

    or, have the ILSP farm it out to local PD or ILSP barracks....fill out the same paperwork, do the background check (10 mins), and give you the FOID. Currently the FOID doesn't require fingerprints, so why they can't do it instantly, I have no idea.

    Maybe because IL WANTS to be a socialist state?
    Magazine <> clip - know the difference

    martyr is a fancy name for crappy fighter
    You have never lived until you have almost died. For those that have fought for it, life has a special flavor the protected will never know

  12. #11
    1943 - 2009
    Array Captain Crunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    10,371
    Quote Originally Posted by Tubby45 View Post
    But the 14th Amendment applies the Bill of Rights to the states.
    Most of them, but not the Second, as well the Third; the right to a grand jury indictment (Fifth Amendment); trial by jury in civil cases (Seventh Amendment) and the ban on excessive bail & fines (Eighth Amendment).

    These are known as Unincorporated Rights.


    When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains,
    And the women come out to cut up what remains,
    Just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains,
    And go to your God like a soldier.

    Rudyard Kipling


    Terry

  13. #12
    VIP Member Array farronwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,767
    Lets see, you have to have a card issued by the state to be in posession of a firearm or ammunition, or to purchase a firearm or ammunition. That doesn't seem to go along with what the constituion says, that is the IL constitution. As far as the US Constitution, there is some room for the states to make thier own laws regarding it. But I voted yes.


    SECTION 22. RIGHT TO ARMS
    Subject only to the police power, the right of the
    individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be
    infringed.
    (Source: Illinois Constitution.)
    Just remember that shot placement is much more important with what you carry than how big a bang you get with each trigger pull.
    www.ddchl.com
    Texas CHL Instructor
    Texas Hunter Education Instructor
    NRA Instructor

  14. #13
    VIP Member Array Tubby45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Making ammo.
    Posts
    3,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Crunch View Post
    Most of them, but not the Second, as well the Third; the right to a grand jury indictment (Fifth Amendment); trial by jury in civil cases (Seventh Amendment) and the ban on excessive bail & fines (Eighth Amendment).

    These are known as Unincorporated Rights.
    The entire BoR is applicable here. I am completely aware what the "unincorporated rights" are.

    Clear text of the 14A:

    Amendment XIV
    Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    "immunities" have been upheld as being a term for "rights" or "those rights that are unalienable".


    What the law says and how it is applied are two entirely different things. The law as it is applied is unconstitutional. The 14A clearly applies the entire BoR to the states. The justices who have voted to the contrary have done a disservice to the Constitution and to the American people. They should be ashamed.

  15. #14
    VIP Member Array SammyIamToday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,087
    Pre 14th amendment I would say no, but now yes. Unincorporated just means that the Supreme Court hasn't ruled on it correct?
    ...He suggested that "every American citizen" should own a rifle and train with it on firing ranges "at every courthouse." -Chesty Puller

  16. #15
    VIP Member Array Tubby45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Making ammo.
    Posts
    3,047
    No, they have. That's why they are unincorporated. Apparently the Supreme Court dictates what parts of the Bill of Rights they want us peasants to have. Cowards.

    http://faculty.ncwc.edu/TOConnor/410/billofrights.htm

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Do I need an FOID when taveling through IL?
    By hothoog in forum Open Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: April 9th, 2010, 08:20 PM
  2. Can an IL Resident(with valid FOID) OC in MI?
    By RXtion in forum Open Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: August 4th, 2009, 03:56 PM
  3. Illinois FOID cards
    By denverbear in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: August 1st, 2009, 10:00 PM
  4. Nazis and the FOID card in Ill-annoy
    By kentuckycarry in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 2nd, 2008, 01:37 PM
  5. Illinois FOID Cards
    By rabywk in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: September 21st, 2007, 08:28 PM

Search tags for this page

foid card unconstitutional

,
foid cards are unconstitutional
,

foid constitutionality

,
foid polls
,
illinois foid unconstitutional
,
poll of should the bill of rights be fully incorporated to the states? poll
Click on a term to search for related topics.