Simple question ...
Can you suppress ( silence ) a revolver ? Please vote in the poll ( assuming i do this right ) before you view the link because it's an experiment that may change your answer .
YouTube - Silenced 1895 Nagant revolver (NFA)
This is a discussion on Can a revolver be suppressed within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Simple question ... Can you suppress ( silence ) a revolver ? Please vote in the poll ( assuming i do this right ) before ...
Yes
No
Simple question ...
Can you suppress ( silence ) a revolver ? Please vote in the poll ( assuming i do this right ) before you view the link because it's an experiment that may change your answer .
YouTube - Silenced 1895 Nagant revolver (NFA)
Make sure you get full value out of today , Do something worthwhile, because what you do today will cost you one day off the rest of your life .
We only begin to understand folks after we stop and think .
Criminals are looking for victims, not opponents.
It depends on what you mean by effectively. Tight tolerances between the cylinder and barrel would make it somewhat effective but loose tolerances would make it almost pointless IMO.
"Wise people learn when they can; fools learn when they must." - The Duke of Wellington
Yes. The Nagant revolver is well known for being suppressed, as the cylinder moves forward to seal off any gap. Knights Armory also made suppressed revolvers out of Ruger Redhawks, but much of the information is classified.
07/02 FFL/SOT
Commercial ammunition reloader
I currently only serve local customers and do not ship ammunition. Thanks for understanding.
I think matiki and Tubby are correct, it can be done with a little more work and know how.
"Just blame Sixto"
2*
M&P Doc- Just ask.
Interesting. The chamber/forcing cone tolerances must be just right. I voted no of course (effectively).![]()
As a general rule, no you can't. It can in some cases make it louder.
But with an example like that revolver where the cylinder is able to create a seal, sure. But not all revolvers are like that.
That is a pretty cool setup that guy has there.
I will support gun control when you can guarantee all guns are removed from this planet. That includes military and law enforcement. When you can accomplish that, then I will be the last person to lay down my gun. Then I will carry the weapon that replaces the gun.
I voted yes - seen the Nagant before...![]()
Voted Yes!
If we can send a man to the moon...
See vid...Well?![]()
"That I cannot do."
"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."
***********************************
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
Well, I voted yes, but only because I figured that the obvious answer would be, well, obvious.
I hadn't seen the Nagant before. Pretty slick!
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in a grey twilight that knows not victory nor defeat."
Theodore Roosevelt
Why would you want one?
There are better tools for the job.
It is better to live one day as a lion, than a thousand years as a lamb...
AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
Maker of cool things to shoot
I said yes, thinking of the Nagant. As far as I knew that was the only one that was possible. Didn't know about the work Knights was doing. But on a lighter note.......
Of course you can silence a revolver! They did it on Get Smart all the time. They even had one in stereo! They also used one in "The Sting". Don't you guys ever watch TV or go to the movies?
Infowars- Proving David Hannum right on a daily basis
Beats me other than the " cool factor " . I just found it interesting given my knee jerk NO reaction that someone did it , and not only did it but spent more on a tax stamp than the original pistol likely cost . Now if anyone has read this far without voting ( shame on you , its out of the spirit if not the conditions ) . i have given it up lol . Now i knew you could easily do it with a nagat , and i knew that some work was done with mixed success with ruger revolvers some years ago ( and we cant even find out why it was " mixed " because the only thing we can see is one working copy , and some company bs about how it " may " work . they fall back on classified and privileged info . this fella took the cheap route , a nagat and a tax stamp lol . IIRC the nagat cost him the 90 bucks or so they bring , the stamp is on the tube .Why would you want one?
Still its an interesting excursive fo both the " nomenclature nazi " and the" mall cop " in all of us . I guess ill close by saying Yes you can , but not like Hollywood makes it seem you can , and unless you shop curios and relics for old obscure revolvers well i would not get hopes up lol .
Make sure you get full value out of today , Do something worthwhile, because what you do today will cost you one day off the rest of your life .
We only begin to understand folks after we stop and think .
Criminals are looking for victims, not opponents.
Get you a Nagant, follow the law (tax stamp...$ 200?) & stick a .32 mag cylinder in there.
To answer the question of "why?", there are two responses: (1) ' cause it can be done; and, (2) no shell casings lying about thereafter....
"...bad decisions that turn out well often make heroes."
Gary D. Mitchell, A Sniper's Journey: The Truth About the Man and the Rifle, P. 103, NAL Caliber books, 2006, 1st Ed.