S & W suit over 460 magnum (Merged) - Page 3

S & W suit over 460 magnum (Merged)

This is a discussion on S & W suit over 460 magnum (Merged) within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; NWAnews.com :: Northwest Arkansas' News Source A man whose hand was seriously injured the first time he fired a revolver in the field is suing ...

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 42 of 42

Thread: S & W suit over 460 magnum (Merged)

  1. #31
    Ex Member Array Ram Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Fayetteville, AR

    Gun maker sued for thumb being severed

    NWAnews.com :: Northwest Arkansas' News Source

    A man whose hand was seriously injured the first time he fired a revolver in the field is suing the weapon’s manufacturer, Smith & Wesson, in federal court in Texarkana.

    In response, the gun manufacturer said there are no problems with the design of the weapon, a 460 model revolver, and that the man caused the accident by not heeding its warnings.

    The lawsuit, filed in July by Todd and Kathy Brown of Rosston, alleges negligence by the gun manufacturer is to blame for a Dec. 27, 2007, accident in which Todd Brown’s left thumb was severed.

    Smith & Wesson’s answer, filed Aug. 14, puts the blame on Todd Brown.

    “Any injuries and damages claimed by the plaintiffs were the result of Todd Brown’s misuse of the handgun and his failure to follow the warnings and instructions provided by Smith & Wesson,” the answer states. “Smith & Wesson says that any injuries or damages sustained by the plaintiffs were solely, directly, and proximately caused by Todd Brown’s negligent actions and conduct.” The Browns’ lawsuit notes that Todd Brown purchased the 460 revolver after seeing ads that touted it as a great way to hunt game, such as deer. Brown bought his gun and a scope on Dec. 21, 2007, for $ 1, 896. 58.

    “Shortly after his purchase, Todd fired a few rounds from this revolver utilizing a table rest in order to sight-in the scope,” the lawsuit states.

    Then, on Dec. 27, 2007, the first day of the Christmas deer hunt, Brown took his gun hunting.

    “The niceties of a table rest to support the revolver being unavailable in the field as one never knows from which direction game will appear, Todd had to support this very heavy gun entirely with the strength of his hands and arms while trying to steady the cross-hairs of the scope on the deer, and in doing this, Todd held the pistol grip with his right hand and placed his left hand under the trigger guard of the revolver and also braced the gun against the window of the deer stand,” the complaint states.

    After firing at the deer, blood began “spurting up in the air and on his gun and clothes.” Brown’s left thumb was severed by the gases escaping from the barrel cylinder gap when it was fired, and a deep gash was left on his palm, the lawsuit states.

    The lawsuit claims that Smith & Wesson should have known a hunter might move a hand forward on the weighty gun’s barrel when trying to site an animal and should have factored that possibility into the gun’s design.

    “Further, Smith & Wesson was negligent in failing to give Todd Brown a reasonable and adequate warning and instruction respecting the nature, extent and severity of the danger of the devastating injury and harm (i. e., it will cut your hand off ) presented to a shooter by its Model 460 Magnum Revolver,” the lawsuit argues.
    What say the jury?
    Well, it's going to be a toss up for me. I figure it's quite possible he can win. I wonder what sort of damages are being sought? I'm sure he'll be offered a settlement. Many idiots have gone before in other situations and won. How about a nice, hot cup of coffee from McDonalds?

  2. #32
    VIP Member
    Array GunnyBunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Victoria, B.C.
    Yet another candidate for the Darwin Awards!
    CCW permit holder for Idaho, Utah, Pennsylvania, Maine and New Hampshire. I can carry in your country but not my own.

  3. #33
    VIP Member
    Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    The lawsuit claims that Smith & Wesson should have known a hunter might move a hand forward on the weighty gun’s barrel ...
    Sure. Absolutely, someone, somewhere is going to misuse it in that fashion. It's inevitable. Welcome to the real world.

    You know, the 26" heavy target barrel on my Savage 12 has been feelin' sort of heavy. I wonder if I should stick my fingers waaaaaaay out there ... you know, to help balance things.

    Uh, no.

    What say the jury? Case dismissed, due to silly claims.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: Why the Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).

  4. #34
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    I wonder if maybe the shooter learned a thumbs forward grip and placed the weak hand thumb in harms way. Personally I feel he shouldn't get anything, anyone who knows much about revos knows gases escape around the force cone .
    "In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson

    Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

  5. #35
    VIP Member Array Yoda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    East Texas
    I am not familiar with this revolver but from what I read this looks like a good case for the plaintiff. I have fired revolvers before and have never known about a severing/amputation hazard from escaped gases.
    Yoda, I am, yes.

  6. #36
    Senior Member Array mulle46's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    He might get something, although I don't think he should. I mean, the woman with the McDonalds coffee at the drive-thru got money because the cup wasnt labeled hot, IIRC.Guns are inherently dangerous. OMO.
    You gain strength, courage, and confidence by every experience in which you really stop to look fear in the face. You are able to say to yourself, "I have lived through this horror. I can take the next thing that comes along." . . . You must do the thing you think you cannot do. Eleanor Roosevelt

  7. #37
    Senior Member Array boscobeans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    upstate new york
    I wouldn't want to keep my hands anywhere near the cylinder gap on my little SP 101, and that would be nothing compared to a 460.

    Last edited by boscobeans; September 9th, 2008 at 09:23 PM. Reason: correction

  8. #38
    VIP Member Array sgtD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    It's not like revolvers have been in use for, oh say, 150 years; and how many times has this happened? This guy must be a real winner.
    When you've got 'em by the balls, their hearts & minds will follow. Semper Fi.

  9. #39
    Member Array REDTAIL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    to bad it wasn't captured on video or you tube it might of made his case a better arguement

  10. #40
    Senior Member Array Daddy Warcrimes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    If he bought the gun used, he might have a case against the vendor for not providing a copy of the owner's manual.

    But the fact of the matter is S&W printed in bold red letters on page 17
    , AND
    Here's one special part that bothers me:
    Smith & Wesson should have known a hunter might move a hand forward on the weighty gun’s barrel when trying
    A handgun is a one handed weapon by federal law. If they start accommodating idiots who fire a handgun like a rifle, are they still making handguns? Or does that cross the line into NFA regulation?
    "and suddenly I can not hold back my sword hand's anger"


  11. #41
    Senior Member Array Sky Pilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Lorain County, Ohio
    I believe it would be wise for me to refrain from comment.
    "Deine Papieren bitte?" or "ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ !"
    (Choose only one)
    NRA Endowment Member
    "I bark at no man's bid. I will never come and go, and fetch and carry, at the whistle of the great man in the White House no matter who he is." -- David Crockett

  12. #42
    Member Array mchaley's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    I personally think that the court should chop his other thumb off, then throw his claim out. It's so popular to sue these days that it's absurd. Local school districts know it's cheaper to pay someone $10,000 to go away than it is to hire a lawyer. Our school districts and tax money is being sucked up by social leaches. If it cost the plaintiff if they lost we would see a different story.

    If someone screws up, sue, it's fine. This is not that case. This guy wasn't thinking and he shot his eye out, I mean thumb off. Boo hoo.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. CC with a suit?
    By BigFish in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: June 26th, 2010, 01:31 AM
  2. 357 Magnum, .44 Magnum, .50 Caliber Handgun Shoot-off
    By ErikGr7 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 1st, 2009, 01:05 AM
  3. New Federal .327 Magnum Cartridge / New Ruger SP101 .327 Fed Magnum : MERGED
    By Captain Crunch in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: April 7th, 2008, 09:24 AM
  4. CC in a suit
    By XD 45 in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: February 12th, 2008, 09:21 PM
  5. New CCW suit
    By falkon in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: February 9th, 2007, 02:36 PM

Search tags for this page

.44 magnum hold

.460 s&w magnum


460 magnum

460 magnum injury
gun maker sued for thumb being severed
marion todd
mt airy nc

mythbusters revolver finger

s&w? 460 thumb
todd and kathy brown of rosston
todd brown lawsuit
todd brown of rosston s&w
Click on a term to search for related topics.