Hammer Fired vs. Internal Striker

Hammer Fired vs. Internal Striker

This is a discussion on Hammer Fired vs. Internal Striker within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Help me out with this one team..... I've been hearing and/or reading that hammer fired handguns (1911's, sigs, hk usp's, beretta 92's, etc.) are more ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Hammer Fired vs. Internal Striker

  1. #1
    Member Array colonel102's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    35

    Question Hammer Fired vs. Internal Striker

    Help me out with this one team.....

    I've been hearing and/or reading that hammer fired handguns (1911's, sigs, hk usp's, beretta 92's, etc.) are more relliable than internal striker handguns (such as xd's/glocks/etc.). Is this true???? Has anyone heard the same thing??? What proof is there???

    Just wondering before I get my next one. It may play a part in the decision.

    Thanks,
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Working for the railroad is like:
    Playing in the Superbowl everyday, winning the game, and still having practice tommorrow.


  2. #2
    Senior Member Array Hydrashok Glock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Location...Location. Ohio
    Posts
    564
    Never had a failure from my glock.
    The choices you make today define you of who you are tommorow

    When you see the light at the end of the tunnel your life is not over..... it is just about to begin

    COPS Protective Services

  3. #3
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    16,074
    Sounds like B.S. to me. Glock, XD, Kahr, Walther P series and many others seem to be very reliable.
    "In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson


    Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

  4. #4
    VIP Member Array TN_Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Shelby County TN
    Posts
    11,129
    I don't think it's true and I have never actually heard that before.

    If you think about it, and external hammer vs. an internal striker, the external hammer has a much greater chance of being blocked or otherwise kept from working properly than the enclosed and inaccessible internal striker.

    I carry a Glock 23 and my wife carries an XD .40sc and neither of them has ever malfunctioned at all nor failed to fire.
    ,=====o00o _
    //___l__,\____\,__
    l_--- \___l---[]lllllll[]
    (o)_)-o- (o)_)--o-)_)

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array BeefyBeefo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    954
    Quote Originally Posted by rocky View Post
    Sounds like B.S. to me. Glock, XD, Kahr, Walther P series and many others seem to be very reliable.
    I agree.

    Personally, I prefer striker-fired guns for SD. I love my Glock and my XD.

    -Jeff-

  6. #6
    Ex Member Array Ram Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    13,687
    Quote Originally Posted by rocky View Post
    Sounds like B.S. to me. Glock, XD, Kahr, Walther P series and many others seem to be very reliable.
    Yeah...I 'll have to agree. B.S.

  7. #7
    Distinguished Member Array SubNine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Anchorage Alaska
    Posts
    1,970
    I've never had any problems with any of the striker fired pistols I own and have owned.
    USMC rule # 23 of gunfighting: Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.

    I am the God fearing, gun toting, flag waving conservative you were warned about!

  8. #8
    Member Array moabicon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Evergreen, CO
    Posts
    25
    If anything I would think that an internal striker may have potential for fewer things going wrong with it.
    Although it may be nice to have the external hammer there just as something extra to play around with.
    I carry a Glock...
    "The faster you finish the fight, the less shot you will get"

  9. #9
    VIP Member
    Array CopperKnight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Spokane area, WA
    Posts
    6,742
    One thought:
    It is possible the discussion was about a second strike capability. With a double action, if the gun goes "click" when it should have gone "bang", you can pull the trigger a second time. With most striker fired and single actions, you have to work the slide and eject the cartridge before you can pull the trigger again.
    eschew obfuscation

    The only thing that stops bad guys with guns is good guys with guns. SgtD

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array AZ Desertrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    710
    Nope....never a problem with striker fired pistols.
    "The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government--lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." --Patrick Henry

    USCG Veteran
    NRA Life Member

  11. #11
    Member Array oldie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    West Central Florida
    Posts
    127
    Me too, have XD 9mm and have never had a problem. I have had mine for 3 years now and love it.
    "We have met the enemy, and it is us." Pogo Possum

  12. #12
    Member Array 1911packer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    420
    Never heard that one. I wouldn't think so. While I carry a 1911 and would never own a Glock, XD, etc., the striker system is not the reason why.

    Dependability is a function of a properly built and maintained firearm firing quality ammo that the gun was built for.

  13. #13
    VIP Member
    Array archer51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    21,863
    I don't think on a whole you will find that one is any more reliable than the other. It all depends on the quality of workmanship put into the design and building of the gun.
    Freedom doesn't come free. It is bought and paid for by the lives and blood of our men and women in uniform.

    USAF Retired
    NRA Life Member

  14. #14
    Senior Moderator
    Array HotGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    14,979
    Hammer fired designs use a hammer that drops upon a spring loaded firing pin.The hammer overcomes the tension of the spring and the firing pin slams the primer to set if off.The hammer is held by a sear, that is dropped when the trigger is pulled, allowing the hammer to go forward.

    Striker designs use a spring loaded firing pin that is held off of the firing pin by a sear that is "dropped" when the trigger is pulled which lets the spring loaded firing pin slam into the primer and ignite it.

    Both designs work and have been for quite some time. Bolt action rifles use the striker design. Any pistol that does not have a hammer uses the striker design.

    As already noted, the Glocks and XD's use it and they are known to work quite well. The Colts, Sigs and HK's that use hammers are also known to work well.

    If it were me, I wouldn't choose a gun based specifically on the design of the mechanism. Instead, I would concentrate upon how it felt in my hand, how I could manipulate the controls, how it naturally pointed for me.
    I would rather stand against the cannons of the wicked than against the prayers of the righteous.


    AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
    Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...
    http://bobbailey1959.wordpress.com/

  15. #15
    Member Array BentLink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Western PA
    Posts
    187
    Without looking at any real data, I'm not sure there's a difference worth worrying for any quality handgun. In theory, the striker design will have fewer moving parts, and fewer that rotate. That should provide less opportunity for failures... way out there in like the sixth decimal point.
    Still Clingin'

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Striker fired FN, FNS-9.
    By GLOCKREAPER in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: June 13th, 2010, 07:37 PM
  2. SP101 : Hammer or Hammer-less???
    By MBtech87 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: September 28th, 2009, 11:28 AM
  3. Striker fired question and concern
    By radtek1986 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: February 3rd, 2009, 07:46 PM
  4. Attention Shooters of 9mm Striker-Fired Pistols
    By Stephen A. Camp in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 1st, 2008, 08:44 AM
  5. UBG Striker II
    By cpmiv in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: February 8th, 2007, 08:21 PM

Search tags for this page

external hammer vs internal hammer
,
hammer fired vs striker fired
,

hammer vs striker

,
hammer vs striker fired
,

internal hammer vs external hammer

,
internal striker
,
internal vs external hammer
,

striker fired versus hammer fired

,

striker fired vs hammer fired

,
striker pin vs hammer
,

striker vs hammer

,

striker vs hammer fired

Click on a term to search for related topics.