Never had a failure from my glock.
This is a discussion on Hammer Fired vs. Internal Striker within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Help me out with this one team..... I've been hearing and/or reading that hammer fired handguns (1911's, sigs, hk usp's, beretta 92's, etc.) are more ...
Help me out with this one team.....
I've been hearing and/or reading that hammer fired handguns (1911's, sigs, hk usp's, beretta 92's, etc.) are more relliable than internal striker handguns (such as xd's/glocks/etc.). Is this true???? Has anyone heard the same thing??? What proof is there???
Just wondering before I get my next one. It may play a part in the decision.
Working for the railroad is like:
Playing in the Superbowl everyday, winning the game, and still having practice tommorrow.
Never had a failure from my glock.
The choices you make today define you of who you are tommorow
When you see the light at the end of the tunnel your life is not over..... it is just about to begin
COPS Protective Services
Sounds like B.S. to me. Glock, XD, Kahr, Walther P series and many others seem to be very reliable.
"In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson
Nemo Me Impune Lacesset
I don't think it's true and I have never actually heard that before.
If you think about it, and external hammer vs. an internal striker, the external hammer has a much greater chance of being blocked or otherwise kept from working properly than the enclosed and inaccessible internal striker.
I carry a Glock 23 and my wife carries an XD .40sc and neither of them has ever malfunctioned at all nor failed to fire.
I've never had any problems with any of the striker fired pistols I own and have owned.
USMC rule # 23 of gunfighting: Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.
I am the God fearing, gun toting, flag waving conservative you were warned about!
If anything I would think that an internal striker may have potential for fewer things going wrong with it.
Although it may be nice to have the external hammer there just as something extra to play around with.
I carry a Glock...
"The faster you finish the fight, the less shot you will get"
It is possible the discussion was about a second strike capability. With a double action, if the gun goes "click" when it should have gone "bang", you can pull the trigger a second time. With most striker fired and single actions, you have to work the slide and eject the cartridge before you can pull the trigger again.
The only thing that stops bad guys with guns is good guys with guns. SgtD
Nope....never a problem with striker fired pistols.
"Never advance cheerfully on your late opponent without reloading. You may have used your last round, and he may not be properly dead and still spiteful."
Major Hugh Pollard
NRA Endowment Member
Me too, have XD 9mm and have never had a problem. I have had mine for 3 years now and love it.
"We have met the enemy, and it is us." Pogo Possum
Never heard that one. I wouldn't think so. While I carry a 1911 and would never own a Glock, XD, etc., the striker system is not the reason why.
Dependability is a function of a properly built and maintained firearm firing quality ammo that the gun was built for.
I don't think on a whole you will find that one is any more reliable than the other. It all depends on the quality of workmanship put into the design and building of the gun.
Freedom doesn't come free. It is bought and paid for by the lives and blood of our men and women in uniform.
NRA Life Member
Hammer fired designs use a hammer that drops upon a spring loaded firing pin.The hammer overcomes the tension of the spring and the firing pin slams the primer to set if off.The hammer is held by a sear, that is dropped when the trigger is pulled, allowing the hammer to go forward.
Striker designs use a spring loaded firing pin that is held off of the firing pin by a sear that is "dropped" when the trigger is pulled which lets the spring loaded firing pin slam into the primer and ignite it.
Both designs work and have been for quite some time. Bolt action rifles use the striker design. Any pistol that does not have a hammer uses the striker design.
As already noted, the Glocks and XD's use it and they are known to work quite well. The Colts, Sigs and HK's that use hammers are also known to work well.
If it were me, I wouldn't choose a gun based specifically on the design of the mechanism. Instead, I would concentrate upon how it felt in my hand, how I could manipulate the controls, how it naturally pointed for me.
Universal Background Checks...the next step towards registration and confiscation.
AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...
Without looking at any real data, I'm not sure there's a difference worth worrying for any quality handgun. In theory, the striker design will have fewer moving parts, and fewer that rotate. That should provide less opportunity for failures... way out there in like the sixth decimal point.