LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksYeah I know its pretty scarry right. Well if SA built a TRP in a true commander size (4 1/4") with a regular barrel and bushing setup, I bet they would sell like no tommorrow.
What do you guys think?
This is a discussion on I was just thinking within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Yeah I know its pretty scarry right. Well if SA built a TRP in a true commander size (4 1/4") with a regular barrel and ...
Array
Yeah I know its pretty scarry right. Well if SA built a TRP in a true commander size (4 1/4") with a regular barrel and bushing setup, I bet they would sell like no tommorrow.
What do you guys think?
Array
Possibly i don't like the bull barrels myself thats why i don't have one
Array
Heck I thought I may have been on to something, but only 1 other person agree's? Must be everyone like's the full size better.
I like the bull barrel on my champ. Less parts to take down with cleaning too. I noticed the big shiny barrel crown makes the barrel seem even bigger than it is.
"In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson
Nemo Me Impune Lacesset
Array
i prefer a fullsize bruce namely because of the bull barrel thing but if i can carry a commander size i can also carry a fullsize so why bother with the shorter one?
Array
I perfer the commander, I shoot better with my Colt Commander than I do with My SA Mil-Spec. 3/4" does make a difference, at least for me.Originally Posted by Bud White
Array
Ya should shoot better with the longer barrel longer sight radius.. But to each there own
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote