Beware of your Smith & Wesson! some are prone to failure state say's!

This is a discussion on Beware of your Smith & Wesson! some are prone to failure state say's! within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Jack - the 442 (.38 spl Centennial Airweight) - Satin Nickel with night sights was one option. 442 Introduced as newest alloy J frame Centennial ...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Beware of your Smith & Wesson! some are prone to failure state say's!

  1. #16
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,482
    Jack - the 442 (.38 spl Centennial Airweight) - Satin Nickel with night sights was one option.

    442 Introduced as newest alloy J frame Centennial 1993.

    Became 442-1 1996, frame change and cyl to J magnum. Rated +P.

    1997 deleted the Nickel finish, for 642-1 in stainless - which I take to mean the 642 takes over. Not sure.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #17
    VIP Member Array maclean3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    3,085
    thanks Chris. Think I'll still keep an eye on that area when cleaning - though I'd think the folks in the shop would be particularly cautious of overtorque on an Al frame. Never though of the exterior front strap as a potential problem area, I usually watch for problems around the forcing cone and for flame cutting where the inner top strap meets the front strap.

    Glad I've got leather coming for my Mil-Spec - no feel good locks, no bullet setback issues (I shoot std. pressure 230 gr.), just good ol' JMB engineering. Of course, my 642 will still get BUG duty and carried when the 1911 is too big.
    Jack

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Smith & Wesson 642 Help
    By 007BondJames in forum Firearm Cleaning & Maintenance
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: February 7th, 2010, 01:44 PM
  2. Smith and Wesson 442 and 642
    By G19inLV in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: January 25th, 2010, 12:30 PM
  3. Smith and Wesson 442 v 642
    By chiboxer in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: January 8th, 2010, 09:55 AM
  4. Smith & Wesson ???
    By hogdaddy in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: September 15th, 2008, 01:26 AM
  5. smith and wesson
    By cnc_marine in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: February 7th, 2006, 05:25 PM

Search tags for this page

1993 smith and wesson 442
,
airweight 442 nickel
,
barrel failure of a smith and wesson
,
beware of smith & wesson
,
beware of smith and wesson
,
s&w model 64 lubrication
,
s&w part 6258
,
smith and wesson 442 failure
,
smith and wesson 442-1
,

smith and wesson model 64 barrel failures

,
smith wesson 442 barrel failure
,
state wants faulty guns replaced
Click on a term to search for related topics.