Which one?

[BlackJack]

Which one?

I have been given the go ahead to get a .22 pistol and the two that I am considering are the Browning Buck Mark and the Ruger 22/45.

They both are about the same price and have similar ergonomics. Both have a reputation of reliability. Both have their controls in the same, or similar, positions.

The Buck Mark is easier to disassemble and reassemble.

The Ruger is supposed to “feel” more like a 1911.

I will be using it for plinking and maybe some small game hunting.

Any opinions out there?


Thanks…

[DefensiveCarry.com]

[retsupt99]

Want some real fun and dual purpose?

Try this...
Ruger New Model Super Single-Six®*Single Action*Revolver (KNR-5) Overview

A great plunker...

[fotomaker57]

Personally I would go with the Browning. Either would be a fine choice. I just like the looks of the Browning better.
Mike

[Wasabi]

I went with a Buck Mark SS Camper and am very happy with it:
Buck Mark Stainless Camper, pistol 22 rimfire auto loading, Browning Firearms Product

That being said, if a good deal pops up on a Ruger SS Hunter, I'll probably be tempted into one of them also. I love .22s.

[rottkeeper]

I went with a Buck Mark SS Camper and am very happy with it:
Buck Mark Stainless Camper, pistol 22 rimfire auto loading, Browning Firearms Product

That being said, if a good deal pops up on a Ruger SS Hunter, I'll probably be tempted into one of them also. I love .22s.

I have a MK11, but that Buck Mark sure does look perdy sweet.

[Wasabi]

I have a MK11, but that Buck Mark sure does look perdy sweet.

Thanks. I waited a long time to find that particular one and finally scored a great deal (NIB) on GunBroker. It was going to get it or this Ruger whichever I found first:
Ruger Mark III™*Rimfire Autoloading*Pistol (KMKIII512H) Overview

I still want the Ruger and have been keeping an eye out for one. There was one (6 7/8" barrel) NIB FS on the SIG forum a few months ago for around $400 (incredible deal) and it sold within 10 minutes of it being posted. I spotted it about 5 minutes afterwards and missed it.

[rottkeeper]

Thanks. I waited a long time to find that particular one and finally scored a great deal (NIB) on GunBroker. It was going to get it or this Ruger whichever I found first:
Ruger Mark III™*Rimfire Autoloading*Pistol (KMKIII512H) Overview

I still want the Ruger and have been keeping an eye out for one. There was one (6 7/8" barrel) NIB FS on the SIG forum a few months ago for around $400 and it sold within 10 minutes of it being posted. I spotted it about 5 minutes afterwards and missed it.

A choice you won't regret I'm sure. Good luck and maybe a range report sometime?

[BikerRN]

If I wanted a .22LR that felt and handled like a 1911 I'd just get a conversion kit and be done with it.

If I was looking to purchase a .22LR I'd go with the Browning, but that's just me.

Biker

[GWRedDragon]

If you want something that 'feels' like your carry gun, get a conversion kit. I love my conversion kit; it's perfect for both training and plinking.

Though, I still do like the idea of the 22/45. Aren't the MKII/MKIII more popular? If so there are probably more aftermarket options for them...

[BlackJack]

If I wanted a .22LR that felt and handled like a 1911 I'd just get a conversion kit and be done with it.

If I was looking to purchase a .22LR I'd go with the Browning, but that's just me.

Biker

Biker,
I am not really too concerned about having a .22 that “feels and handles” like the 1911, that is just an added plus.

As for a conversion kit… I have one for my CZ and am not overly pleased with it. I get a large number of misfires with it (sometimes as many as one or two per magazine). I really do not think it is the ammo since I experience no misfires with the 10/22 while using ammo from the same lot. I realize that most conversion kits work fine, but this has just left me with a bad taste in my mouth and I would rather get a dedicated pistol at this point.

I am leaning towards the Browning, but have not ruled out the Ruger just yet.

Thanks

[BentLink]

My Mark II is a Chinese puzzle when it comes to disassembly and reassembly. It's a sweet shooter and darned accurate. Rugers have a heap of after-market add-ons as well for target shooting and suppression. Overall, some big pluses and minuses.

I know folks who love the buck mark. I reckon fit and finish a little nicer with the Browning. Either way, can't go wrong.

[swiftyjuan]

I have 3 Buckmarks for sihoulette shooting, and they are outstanding. I have used one of them for over 25 years, and it is still going strong. Ruger does make a great .22, but the Buckmarks and Contenders are dominate in our area.

[SIXTO]

I prefer the Rugers because you can do a little more with them, but think that the Brownings are a little better off the shelf.

[ripley16]

Both are well made and accurate. I personally prefer the Browning grip over the Ruger's.

[GWRedDragon]

As for a conversion kit… I have one for my CZ and am not overly pleased with it. I get a large number of misfires with it (sometimes as many as one or two per magazine). I really do not think it is the ammo since I experience no misfires with the 10/22 while using ammo from the same lot. I realize that most conversion kits work fine, but this has just left me with a bad taste in my mouth and I would rather get a dedicated pistol at this point.

Sounds to me like a poor quality kit.