Fayetteville NC cops steal permittee's gun after car crash

Fayetteville NC cops steal permittee's gun after car crash

This is a discussion on Fayetteville NC cops steal permittee's gun after car crash within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; FayObserver.com - Gun owner says police violating his rights By Andrew Barksdale Staff writer George Boggs thought he was doing police a favor last week ...

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 67

Thread: Fayetteville NC cops steal permittee's gun after car crash

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array paramedic70002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Franklin, VA
    Posts
    5,144

    Fayetteville NC cops steal permittee's gun after car crash

    FayObserver.com -

    Gun owner says police violating his rights
    By Andrew Barksdale
    Staff writer

    George Boggs thought he was doing police a favor last week when he handed over the firearm he kept in his car after he was in a wreck.

    Boggs has a permit to carry a concealed weapon, and he wanted his handgun secured while he went to the hospital, he said. The permit requires him to notify police of his weapon.

    On Monday, when he went to the Fayetteville Police Department to retrieve his gun, he couldn't get it back. He was told that police first wanted to fire the gun to see if the spent shell casing and round would match data in a nationwide ballistics inventory used to solve crimes.

    The gun is scheduled to be test-fired today, he was told.

    Boggs complained to police supervisors that his new gun has never been fired. The ballistics test, he said, would diminish the value of the .45-caliber Taurus Millennium he bought last month for $399 at a local gun store.

    He said the city is violating his Fourth Amendment rights that protect him from unreasonable searches and seizures.

    Police defend their decade-old policy of checking most handguns that come into their custody - no matter the reason - to see if they have been used in a crime. They say public safety outweighs any inconvenience to the owner.

    Boggs said he did nothing wrong. He was not arrested. The gun was not taken from a crime scene. The other driver in the Aug. 14 accident was cited, a police report says.

    "If they can get away with this, then they can get away with other things," he said.

    Boggs, 70, is a retired Army sergeant first class who is running for City Council this fall against incumbent Robert Massey in District 3. He said his fight over the police policy is not politically motivated.

    Sgt. John Somerindyke said in situations such as this, police can't assume a weapon has never been used.

    "We have to be consistent with our policy," he said. "We have had some hits doing this."

    Somerindyke said that since 2003, the ballistics tests have identified 32 guns that were used in crimes in Cumberland County.

    Since 1999, the Police Department has sent most handguns taken into custody to the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office, where the ballistics examination is done free for law enforcement agencies. The information is entered into the Integrated Ballistics Identification System, which is like a database of fingerprints for guns. Shell casings recovered at crime scenes can be matched with guns previously entered into the database.

    Since January, the police agency has sent 331 guns and 315 shell casings and rounds to the Sheriff's Office for testing.

    Boggs said he is talking with officials at the National Rifle Association about his situation. A representative of the NRA could not be reached for comment this week.

    Tiffanie Sneed, the Police Department's lawyer, said the gun-testing policy helps make the community safer. People sometimes buy guns not knowing they have been used in crimes. The weapons are returned to their owners if the tests show they were not used in crimes, she said.

    "Due to the gravity of the subject matter, we don't deviate from this policy, as long as the weapon meets the IBIS criteria," she said.

    Boggs said others with concealed-weapon permits could be less likely to tell police they have a gun, for fear of it being taken and tested.

    According to Debbie Tanna, a Sheriff's Office spokeswoman, all firearms are tested at the factory before being sent to dealers. Bernard Barr, who helps manage Guns Plus in Spring Lake, said he doesn't believe that's true. Some manufacturers don't test weapons before shipping them, he said. That includes the Taurus Millennium model that Boggs bought, he said.

    Barr said firing a new weapon for ballistics doesn't necessarily lower its value.

    Barr said he personally has no qualms with the police testing weapons seized as evidence - but not guns voluntarily surrendered for safe-keeping.

    "It's like taking DNA from every citizen," he said. "Why investigate something that is not a crime? It just doesn't make sense."

    Staff writer Andrew Barksdale can be reached at barksdalea@fayobserver.com or 486-3565.
    "Each worker carried his sword strapped to his side." Nehemiah 4:18

    Guns Save Lives. Paramedics Save Lives. But...
    Paramedics With Guns Scare People!


  2. #2
    VIP Member
    Array goawayfarm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Fork Union, Virginia
    Posts
    2,695
    ....."It's like taking DNA from every citizen," he said. "Why investigate something that is not a crime? It just doesn't make sense.".....
    I'm with the gun owner on this one! What's going to happen when it comes back 'clean'? The data is still going to be kept on file for future use.......
    Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.-Seneca

    "If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. If I have a gun, what do I have to be paranoid about?" -Clint Smith

    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Jeff Cooper

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Array Bark'n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    West Central Missouri
    Posts
    9,917
    I do see a Fourth Amendment case to be made here.

    While I'm not an attorney, I do see time and time again, people who think a "good intentioned policy" can trump the Constitution!
    -Bark'n
    Semper Fi


    "The gun is the great equalizer... For it is the gun, that allows the meek to repel the monsters; Whom are bigger, stronger and without conscience, prey on those who without one, would surely perish."

  4. #4
    VIP Member Array Paco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    McKinney, TX
    Posts
    3,507
    They say public safety outweighs any inconvenience to the owner
    Um, excuse me! inconvenience to the owner, how about to the Constitution?
    "Don't hit a man if you can possibly avoid it; but if you do hit him, put him to sleep." - Theodore Roosevelt

    -Paco
    http://www.shieldsd.net

  5. #5
    Distinguished Member Array tinkerinWstuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    1,263
    I see two serious problems here...

    First - carrying a gun for defense that has never been fired. I bought a Taurus and carried it around in the car for a week before making it to the range to try it out. Didn't even get every shot off in the cylinder before the dual action trigger mechanism and cylinder advance bar jammed up.

    And besides that fact, I agree that it sounds like a 4th ammendment case.
    "Run for your life from the man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper's bell of an approaching looter. So long as men live together on earth and need means to deal with one another-their only substitute, if they abandon money, is the muzzle of a gun."

    Who is John Galt?

  6. #6
    Senior Member Array Mardet65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio vicinity
    Posts
    698
    So hypothetically , If I'm going on vacation and have no way to secure my guns and I give them to the P. D. for safe keeping until I return - not that I'd ever do that; that allows them to test fire them to see if they've ever been used in a crime?

    I understand where the P. D's. interest lies in this, but I gotta' go with the gun owner on this one.
    "Kimbers are the guns you show your friends, Glocks are the guns you show your enemies."

  7. #7
    New Member Array USF Rugger7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    10
    Laws and policies like this almost always turn into major violations of the constitution... and yet they keep getting passed to 'protect us'...seems to be becoming quite a trend
    Really... I believe you..

  8. #8
    Administrator
    Array SIXTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    19,936
    There is an issue here... but it isnt 4th amendment. Not sure where it falls, but it aint there. I agree with the gun owner, but I got to think about this for a bit.

    Diminish the value of his Taurus? Come on now...thats grasping at straws.

    And like usual, paramedics title is very misleading.
    "Just blame Sixto"

  9. #9
    Distinguished Member Array Bunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    North Carolina - LKN
    Posts
    1,384
    Um...I'm still stuck on the fact that his EDC Personal Protection firearm has NEVER BEEN FIRED. How on earth does he practice with it, then? Oh wait, he doesn't? So when SHTF, how on earth will he be any good with his firearm and make sure he not only DOES hit the bad guy, but DOESN'T hit any innocents?

    While we're on a nitpicking tear, I HATE HATE HATE HATE it when people refer to their FIREARM as a "weapon." Heck, a ball-point pen in my purse is a "weapon." In fact, I have a t-shirt I proudly wear that says "Don't frisk me, I am the weapon."

    It's a firearm, it's a gun, it's a Taurus Millenium, etc. When we have the Scouts out doing NRA Basic Rifle classes, we're not going to let a bunch of 12 year old boys "pick up their weapons." Love how the media just uses escalation-semantics. Argh! //end rant.

    Sorry, back to topic...how is the ballistics test going to lower the value of his gun? If he wants it in mint condition, he should bronze it and keep it in a hermetically sealed chamber. Not use it as his EDC.
    Don't frisk me, I am the weapon.


    Sig Sauer P239 DAK (9mm)
    NRA Member & Pistol Instructor

    www.vanguardnc.com

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array bbqgrill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    In Delaware, East of the Mason Dixon Line.
    Posts
    797
    No question violates the 4th and likely the 5th as it deprives the citizen of his property without due process.


    Cheers,
    "To believe that social reforms can eradicate evil altogether is to forget that evil is a protean creature, forever assuming a new shape when deprived of an old one." - SAT

    Never argue with an idiot - they'll bring you down to their level then beat you with experience.

  11. #11
    VIP Member Array cphilip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,187
    Ok so let me see here.

    What they are saying is consistency makes it right. So if we consistently violate the constitution we are right? So two (or three or four... ) wrongs DO make a right!

    Its as if they think the difference between right and wrong is always "but we do it to everyone". Like its a racial thing or something. And therefore if we do something wrong to everyone then no one should complain...

    Got it.

  12. #12
    VIP Member Array varob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,452
    Not only does this violate his 4th amendment rights, this violates his 2nd amendment rights as well.

    How's this: You are stopped for tail light out, you notify the LEO of your carry status and the LEO "secures" your gun. When the stop is completed, the cop says to you "we have to check every gun in our possession against our data base"

    I certainly hope the NRA takes up this case. Two of this guys constitutional rights are being denied because of a "policy" not a law.
    Don't believe what you hear and only half of what you see!
    -Tony Soprano

  13. #13
    Member Array Faitmaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Dayton, Ohio
    Posts
    358
    Quote Originally Posted by cphilip View Post
    What they are saying is consistency makes it right. So if we consistently violate the constitution we are right? So two (or three or four... ) wrongs DO make a right!
    Uh uh uh uh. Careful. They aren't even consistent.

    "Police defend their decade-old policy of checking most handguns that come into their custody"
    "The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." - Ayn Rand

    NRA Member / Ohio Conceal Carry Instructor
    CHL Holder

  14. #14
    Member Array DblTap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by paramedic
    He said the city is violating his Fourth Amendment rights that protect him from unreasonable searches and seizures.

    Police defend their decade-old policy of checking most handguns that come into their custody - no matter the reason - to see if they have been used in a crime. They say public safety outweighs any inconvenience to the owner.
    I see it a a Fourth Amendment violation also.
    Though the seizure was voluntary, it was limited to a request to securing the handgun. NOT a search of the property.
    There was no reasonable suspicion, no probable cause, and no authority other than a department policy.
    Mr. George Boggs has a reasonable expectation of privacy that his handgun was only going to be secured for him.
    My opinion is, this officer may be in trouble.
    Ritalin - So much easier than parenting.

  15. #15
    VIP Member
    Array shooterX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,848
    Sounds to me like he has a case, and I agree with Sixto, the thread title was very misleading!

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. e bay steal!
    By pirate in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: September 3rd, 2009, 02:07 AM
  2. Why would someone steal this?
    By Phillep Harding in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: August 29th, 2009, 12:34 AM
  3. Age ranges of permittee's
    By ppkheat in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: June 6th, 2009, 08:50 AM
  4. Unarmed English cops saved by man with sword.Cops want to arrest savior.
    By Grappler1911 in forum Defensive Knives & Other Weapons
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: April 4th, 2007, 03:16 AM
  5. Hello from Fayetteville
    By Greg700 in forum New Members Introduce Yourself
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: June 18th, 2006, 09:38 AM

Search tags for this page

buy guns in fayetteville nc
,
concealed carry weapons permit in fayetteville north carolina
,
concealed weapons permit classes in fayetteville nc
,

concealed weapons permit fayetteville nc

,
concealed weapons permit in fayetteville nc
,
fayetteville police department concealed weapons
,
fayetteville, nc no gun
,
gun is in view after car crash
,
how long is it taking to get a pistol permit in fayetteville , nc
,
if you're incapacitated in an accident in fay, nc what happens to your car?
,
infidel motorcycle accident fayetteville, nc
,

what gun does fayetteville pd carry

Click on a term to search for related topics.