Decocker safety ???
This is a discussion on Decocker safety ??? within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I was reading an article in Combat Handguns last night, it was talking about the safety issue of not using the decocking device on your ...
April 4th, 2006 09:11 AM
Decocker safety ???
I was reading an article in Combat Handguns last night, it was talking about the safety issue of not using the decocking device on your gun if it has one. If you use the old method of thumb on hammer and finger on trigger, the hammer goes all the way down, allowing it to strike the firing pin and discharge the chambered round if the hammer is struck or lands on the hammer in a fall.
I don't have this feature on my glock, but am looking at diversifying some in the future.
Is there a safety position for the hammer on these guns, My SA frontier scoutt 22 has a first cock, keeps hammer off the pin, second allows rotating the cyl to load/unlaod and the third is the firing position. I'm guessing this is the same basic process.
I figured this might be something good for others here to know who also have these types of guns and may not have heard of this yet. The article didn't give any specific brands or models.
We can't be too careful.
"fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen." [Warren v. District of Columbia,(D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981)]
If I have to explain it, you wouldn't understand
April 4th, 2006 09:17 AM
One thing I like alot about my Mak, decocker, safety and very stiff trigger pull on the first shot.
No way I'm going to have an AD on this thing.
April 4th, 2006 09:24 AM
thumbing the hammer down is always a damgerous move. The 1911 has a half cock notch that is there to catch the hammer should it slip off your thumb, but it is still a bad idea to use such a method.
You should always read your instruction manual for your firearms and get acquainted on how your particular firearm was designed to function. You shouldn't try to modify and of the safety features either.
April 4th, 2006 09:36 AM
Maybe it's a question to pose to the group. How do you decock?
My personal preference? I use the decocker. I'm more inclined to trust that it functions correctly, than to trust that the hammer won't slip from under my thumb. Never had a decocker fail. Did once have the hammer slip. Luckily it was empty, but lemme tell ya. The "holy cr**" factor still hit and made me think...What would have happened if it had been loaded?
There's my 2cents worth.
The only thing that stops bad guys with guns is good guys with guns. SgtD
April 4th, 2006 09:46 AM
April 4th, 2006 12:08 PM
Don't the SIG and Walther (PPK series) decockers let the hammer down "almost" all the way - and then when you flip the decocker back to the fire position, the hammer goes down to its resting position? I don't have a SIG around here to try it, but I just seem to remember that they kind of catch the hammer just before the down position.
April 4th, 2006 12:16 PM
I have an HK USPc .40 V1. It has a combination decocker / safety. I'll show you the difference between a hammer that was dropped with the decocker, and a hammer that was dropped by pulling the trigger.
I'll post pictures later tonight.
Firefighter / EMT - Always Ready. Ever Willing.
~Never do anything that you don't want to have to explain to the paramedics...~
April 4th, 2006 12:17 PM
My Smith & Wesson 5906 has a decocker, which I use. It doesn't come out of the safe very often though.
Originally Posted by CopperKnight
My 1911's never get "decocked". No reason to, that I can see. If it's loaded, it's cocked and locked.... if it's cleared, I pull the trigger on an empty chamber.
NRA Life Member
Northwest Florida Defensive Pistol Shooters Member
April 4th, 2006 12:24 PM
I have an H&k with a decocker. It does make me feel a bit better knowing that the gun is decocked yet ready to fire just by pulling the trigger a bit harder then normal. My HK is DA/SA so olny the first shot is DA.
April 4th, 2006 12:27 PM
For as much as I love the CZ-75 and most of its clones is as much as I dislike the fact that you have to pull the trigger and ease the hammer down to decock and put it in DA fire mode.
As a result, I carry my CZ-40B (when I do) in SA mode (cocked and locked) as not to use that way of decocking the gun.
USAF: Loving Our Obscene Amenities Since 1947
April 4th, 2006 12:35 PM
Originally Posted by QKShooter
That is one of the things I like about my SIGs. Some of the newer models don't have it, but I don't have any of them (yet?).
EOD - Initial success or total failure
April 4th, 2006 12:55 PM
I use the decocker on my Ruger P85 and it works great, although anytime I use it with a round in the champer the muzzle is pointed in a safe direction.
George Washington: "A free people ought to be armed."
April 4th, 2006 01:18 PM
If your gun was designed with a decocker then you should use it, if you carry a 1911 style handgun then cocked and locked is the way to go, no reason to decock if your gun does not have a decocker
April 4th, 2006 01:22 PM
My HK has a decocker and I am not hesitate to use it at all. My Ruger P89 and 95 had it as well and I always used them.
Just a heads up: If you get a CZ-52, test out the decocker first on an EMPTY chamber. I have two. The first one works no problem, on the second it is a second trigger . Luckly I did research before I tested them out with a live round.
Also, if you put a slide stop on the CZ-52 (which I did on the second one since the decocker didn't work anyway), the decocker becomes a second trigger.
As for the 1911, it just stays cocked and locked when carried. If I need to put the hammer down then I unload it first and then do it. On a revolver, well, you have to use the thumb/trigger method.
April 4th, 2006 01:46 PM
Agree with QK re SIG's - I know the mechanism that provides the block and it is as foolproof as any design I have encountered - tho I as you'd expect decock always into a safe zone - and i mean always.
I have decock also on P95, P97 - they also are A1 reliable. The Mak is fine too. I find the Bersa also to be reliable. The SW99 is equally safe from useage experience but I do not as yet know the mechanism so am maybe a shade more leary of that one .......... of course there, no hammer to lower anyways
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.
"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."
- a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.
By Jetpilot007 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: December 19th, 2009, 06:07 PM
By Ron in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: May 20th, 2009, 03:51 PM
By clarkston_cz in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: April 23rd, 2008, 08:26 PM
By Crexrun in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: October 19th, 2006, 01:49 PM
By sojourner in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: July 25th, 2006, 11:23 PM
Search tags for this page
decocker as a safety device on a handgun
decocker how does it work pictures
decocker safety concealed carry
decocking device for 1911 pistols
difference between safety and decocker
guns with safety and decocker
h&k de cocker
hk decocker failure
safety decocker issues
sig decocker safety
Click on a term to search for related topics.