.40 cal in glock or change to 357 sig barrel

.40 cal in glock or change to 357 sig barrel

This is a discussion on .40 cal in glock or change to 357 sig barrel within the General Firearm Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Ok now I dont want to start a fight between calibers here I just know quite a bit about the 40 but nothing about the ...

Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: .40 cal in glock or change to 357 sig barrel

  1. #1
    Member Array mrm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    295

    .40 cal in glock or change to 357 sig barrel

    Ok now I dont want to start a fight between calibers here I just know quite a bit about the 40 but nothing about the 357 sig and Im looking for input from people who have shot them both, preferably thru a glock

    1 do you gain anything
    2 is the kick worse or better
    3 speed vs size
    4 anything else of importance

    Thanks by the way its a glock 27
    "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
    - Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)


  2. #2
    VIP Member Array Stevew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    3,452
    357 sig is a good round, ballistically. To me it seemed very loud. I would imagine in low light it would have a lot of muzzle flash. I am not sure how well the 9mm bullets work with the added 300 FPS.
    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around laws. Plato

  3. #3
    Member Array Tx1911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    75
    I have a Glock 32 with the 40 barrel.

    1. I gained more penetration with the .357 sig, during winter months people wear more clothing.

    2. Kicks a little harder, but more of a straight back vs. a the flippy 40

    3. Depending on the load, standard loads 357 sig more speed. 40 slightly bigger round.

    4. Importance .. yes the .357 sig ammo is expensive ! LOL.

    I think the only advantage of the .357 sig is barrier penetration versus the 40. But if you live a warm area the 40 is fine, live up north and people are packing on a lot of clothing I would carry the .357 sig during winter.
    Springfield Armory 1911-A1 TRP SS
    Glock 17
    Glock 32 ( w/ 23 barrel )
    Smith & Wesson M&P 9

  4. #4
    VIP Member Array AZ Husker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    4,244
    If you already have the G27, I'd stick with the .40, but if you're considering buying one, I'd go with the G33. I just love the performance of the .357 Sig. Tex answered your questions well.
    Treat me good, I'll treat you better. Treat me bad, I'll treat you worse.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array HK Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    776
    Hey, penetration is always a good thing, but honestly? There ain't much difference in service caliber pistol rounds. 9mm, .45 ACP, .40 or .357 Sig all do perty much the same job with perty much the same result. Why modify your gun? (Not smart for a defensive piece anyway).

    Dan
    "What does Marcellus Wallace LOOK like?"

  6. #6
    Member Array Captain38's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    188
    You'll find there's a noticeably louder report with the .357 SIG round, and, if you're shooting from a covered area, there'll be more muzzle blast concussion felt.

    People immediately adjacent to you on the firing line MAY even try to get relocated, if possible, because you're distracting them!

  7. #7
    Member Array Gearslammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    ct
    Posts
    54
    Its a good round but I don't care for it. What purpose does it have? I don't know ...maybe just to be different. I decided to get rid of my 357Sig after doing much much reading on it. Yes, I still have my 9 and 40 and probably won't ever get rid of them.
    Imo it really seemed like an in-between round of the 9 and 40. The 9 and 40 can do the same, about the same, or if not better than the 357Sig. Plus the increased muzzle flash, and recoil, and sound really wasn't a "ooo look its shiny" sell point to keep it. I purchased it on a impulse buy ooops lol.
    To each their own...good luck in your decision.

  8. #8
    VIP Member
    Array DaveH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Posts
    5,036
    I can't speak to the Glock.

    However, I had a Sig 2340 with both barrel.

    My experience was about the same as Tx1911 plus the point of impact between the two was quite a bit more different that between different loads in the same caliber.

    I suspect the same might be true w/ a Glock
    Μολὼν λαβέ

    I'm just one root in a grassroots organization. No one should assume that I speak for the VCDL.

    I am neither an attorney-at-law nor I do play one on television or on the internet. No one should assumes my opinion is legal advice.

    Veni, Vidi, Velcro

  9. #9
    Distinguished Member Array 21bubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    ky.
    Posts
    1,890
    Several friends of mine have had a assortment of glocks chambered in .40S&w. Everyone of them at some point have tried a .357 SIG barrel in their respective guns. None of them went back to the 40.

  10. #10
    Member Array Joeface's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    North Carolina, Cabarrus Co.
    Posts
    237
    I have swapped out my .40 for the 357sig in my G27 and I like the round a lot. I have the .40 barrel in my range case for practice fire. .40 is a lot cheaper and more readily available.
    NRA Endowment Member
    USCCA Member
    Certified Glock Armorer
    Patriot Guard Rider

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array Devone6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    South of North, North of South
    Posts
    654
    I am a big fan of the 357Sig , I have 40 & 357 barrels for my G27 and Sig229. I wear hearing protection when I shoot so I don't really notice any difference in the report, and the 357Sig may have a little more snap in the recoil, but not that much.

    I get my 40S&W ammo for free, so I do shoot it (40) more, but shoot the 357Sig quite a bit and carry it more.

    The 357Sig has better ballistics across the board, but there is absolutly nothing wrong with the .40S&W.

    As for it being a bad idea to modify your carry gun, this really isn't a modification, it is only a barrel swap, slide, frame, guide rod, and magazines are all the same, and I bought factory barrels, so I don't think it matters at all. I've never had a problem with the Glock or Sig, which were both 40s, when using the 357Sig barrel. You can even order the Sig229 from the factory with both barrels, so if it comes from the factory with both barrels, then obviously the factory doesn't consider this (non)modification a problem.

    Buy a barrel, $125 or so and then you have both!

    I think you will like it!
    My heroes are Veterans and My Father (who was a veteran).

    I believe prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance should have REMAINED in schools, and the Ten Commandments should have REMAINED in schools, courthouses, and everywhere else it was before the ACLU got involved.

  12. #12
    VIP Member Array frankmako's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    3,852
    i know that the people that change over to the 357sig like it and stay with it. to me it is an increased muzzle flash, recoil, and sound over the 40 s&w. but several of the local departments have gone to it and turned in their 40's, 45's, and 9's.
    An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.

    Red State State of Mind

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array RebelRabbi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Smithfield NC
    Posts
    574
    With a short Bbl. I prefer the 40 and with longer Bbl's I like the 357 Sig. 357 has a "sharper" quick recoil but I find follow ups to be faster than the slower shove of the heavier 40. The 357 Sig is the most accurate Pistol cartridge that I have ever fired compared to 9mm, 40 S&W, 45 ACP, 380, 32 or 25. The 45acp 185 gr. is second IMHO.

  14. #14
    VIP Member
    Array OldVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    S. Florida, north of the Miami mess, south of the Mouse trap
    Posts
    16,869
    I'm planning on getting a G22 and then conversion barrels in 9mm and .357 Sig. The ability to shoot 3 different rounds is too good to pass up to me. Since this isn't meant to be a CC firearm, I'm not too concerned about any "mod" issues. I also reload, so availability and cost of ammo isn't a big concern to me.
    Retired USAF E-8. Lighten up and enjoy life because:
    Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... "For What It's Worth" Buffalo Springfield

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. glock front sight? did you change yours?
    By damien12g in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: July 22nd, 2010, 08:42 AM
  2. Can I change a Glock 26 to a 27?
    By indenial in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: February 28th, 2010, 04:05 PM
  3. Putting a Glock 19 barrel in a Glock 26
    By ExactlyMyPoint in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: September 7th, 2009, 09:38 PM
  4. Glock sights easy to change? (G26)
    By TerryD in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: April 6th, 2008, 02:36 AM

Search tags for this page

.40 cal barrel for glock 32
,
40 cal barrel for glock 32
,
40 cal barrel glock 32
,
can glock 27 shoot 357
,

difference between 40 cal and 357 sig

,
glock 27 357 sig barrel
,
glock 27 to 357 sig
,
glock 32 40 cal
,

glock 32 40 cal barrel

,

glock 32 barrel in glock 27

,
glock 357 barrel
,

glock 40 cal barrel

Click on a term to search for related topics.