I guess they are taking over Texas also...sad
This is a discussion on I guess they are taking over Texas also...sad within the Home (And Away From Home) Defense Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; TX family evacuates 38K acre ranch due to Drug Cartel
Saw this elsewhere and I was PO'd I thought I would share. And this is ...
3Likes
-
December 30th, 2010 09:33 AM
#1
Senior Member
Array
I guess they are taking over Texas also...sad
TX family evacuates 38K acre ranch due to Drug Cartel
Saw this elsewhere and I was PO'd I thought I would share. And this is 70 miles inland!
Sad that this is what America is coming to
for those who hunt and own land near the border counties, prayers go up
meanwhile, those in Washington could care less about this problem
If nothing is done, it will be to late
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP0xX...layer_embedded
Socialism: A great Idea...'til you run out of other people's money. Margaret Thatcher
"A man without a gun is a subject, a man with a gun is a citizen."
~Ted Nugent
-
December 30th, 2010 09:33 AM
Remove Ads
-
December 30th, 2010 11:33 AM
#2
VIP Member
Array
We are experiencing a foreign invasion on our home soil...its time the powers that be take it seriously and commit resources to it. Then, they turn around and blame the violence on the US gun stores. Who are they kidding...they don't get their weapons from gun stores. This is a shame and the drugs and violence are just continuing to spread further in.
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
Guns are like sex and air...its no big deal until YOU can't get any.
-
December 30th, 2010 11:39 AM
#3
-
December 30th, 2010 11:42 AM
#4
Member
Array
I believe that we should send Obama and the the whole lot down there for one week with out the secret service and let them camp out at that ranch. If it were their hide in trouble we would be calling in the national guard.
It just smacks of indifference that these jackasses wont take this more seriously.
-
December 30th, 2010 11:42 AM
#5
Member
Array
Those "powers that be" claim they are doing more than an anyone in history and the border is safer than ever. Until they decide to be honest about the situation and their place in it, not much will happen unless it is done locally. And the locals are outmanned and outgunned.
-
December 30th, 2010 11:50 AM
#6
VIP Member
Array
This is a violent invasion by foreign nationals committing crimes on our soil. In my opinion (which is worth nothing), this seems to warrant military intervention on some level. I can think of several other countries in which the US sent military resources to deal with foreign invasion...why not protect ourselves for a change?
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
Guns are like sex and air...its no big deal until YOU can't get any.
-
December 30th, 2010 11:59 AM
#7
VIP Member
Array
This boggles my mind. Foreign invaders on our soil. What other primary purpose does the federal gov't have over protecting its own citzens?
Health care, equal opportunity, ear-mark projects, environmental concerns, and generally putting the screws to its citizens through increased regulation on all fronts, seem to take precedence with this administration.
__________________________________
'Clinging to my guns and religion
-
December 30th, 2010 12:05 PM
#8
Ex Member
Array
I have said this time and time again, closing the borders and actually WINNING the war on drugs would cause all that federal tax funding to go away. The worse it is the more money all the municipalities and states can squeeze from the feds and buy new vehicles, equipments, and gear up like paramilitary units. Who really stands to lose money if they close the borders? The cartels? naaaa the cities and states that get war on drug slush funds, the three letter agencies that get to skim money off the top of war on drug funds for unaccountable black ops. The borders will never be closed.
-
December 30th, 2010 12:18 PM
#9
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
azchevy
I have said this time and time again, closing the borders and actually WINNING the war on drugs would cause all that federal tax funding to go away. The worse it is the more money all the municipalities and states can squeeze from the feds and buy new vehicles, equipments, and gear up like paramilitary units. Who really stands to lose money if they close the borders? The cartels? naaaa the cities and states that get war on drug slush funds, the three letter agencies that get to skim money off the top of war on drug funds for unaccountable black ops. The borders will never be closed.
You're probably right. I'm sure there's layers upon layers of politics and money involved. On many levels I'm sure there are people with vested interests in not fixing certain problems. If the squeaky wheel gets the grease, why stop the squeak.
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
Guns are like sex and air...its no big deal until YOU can't get any.
-
December 30th, 2010 02:30 PM
#10
Administrator
Array
"...its time the powers that be take it seriously and commit resources to it."
Not all but, some of the "powers that be" are part of it.
-
December 30th, 2010 03:20 PM
#11
VIP Member
Array
I find it Hilarious/rediculous, and a farce, that we have a no trade/no travel , nothing to do with Cuba of all places, and here we have a powder keg of monumental proportions detonating slowly, with ever increasing veracity, right on our border, and we still have Idiots willing to vacation , spend their money there, buy goods and trade with this ridiculous 4th world country, and the government turns a blind eye.
We need to STOP doing business with This H.E. Double Hockey stick - hole of a country, post haste!
If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.
Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British, He shot them!
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy." -- Ernest Benn
-
December 30th, 2010 03:28 PM
#12
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
sigs
Those "powers that be" claim they are doing more than an anyone in history and the border is safer than ever. Until they decide to be honest about the situation and their place in it, not much will happen unless it is done locally. And the locals are outmanned and outgunned.
^^^^^^YEP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Kinda like the Energy Department
No slam intended, but take this for what its worth,
Begun officially on August 4, 1977 during the Carter administration, now with 16,000 employees, 100,000 contract employees and an annual budget of over $24 billion, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) was created to reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil; develop energy efficient technologies; strengthen America's energy security, environmental quality, and economic vitality; and ...bring clean, reliable and affordable energy technologies to the marketplace.
Three decades later, how has this well-funded federal department done? What's your take? Has it become a matter of the foxes guarding the henhouse?
Take from here;;http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directo...lean_Energy%3F
If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.
Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British, He shot them!
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy." -- Ernest Benn
-
December 30th, 2010 03:49 PM
#13
VIP Member
Array

Retired USAF E-8. Avatar is OldVet from days long gone - 1978. Oh, to be young again...
Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... "For What It's Worth" Buffalo Springfield
-
December 30th, 2010 03:57 PM
#14
Senior Member
Array
Our Goverment should be ashamed for the lack support afforded to these boarder towns, if they did maybe these familys wouldn't have to move out of their homes.
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” -- Thomas Jefferson
-
December 30th, 2010 04:24 PM
#15
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
WHEC724
This boggles my mind. Foreign invaders on our soil. What other primary purpose does the federal gov't have over protecting its own citzens?
Health care, equal opportunity, ear-mark projects, environmental concerns, and generally putting the screws to its citizens through increased regulation on all fronts, seem to take precedence with this administration.
+1
gdhs_2099_13118064.jpeg
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By ErnieNWillis in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 30
Last Post: July 9th, 2009, 01:21 AM
-
By FireAir7215 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 15
Last Post: February 15th, 2009, 10:39 PM
-
By Jungle Work in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Replies: 36
Last Post: April 11th, 2007, 10:01 PM
-
By ExSoldier in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Replies: 18
Last Post: April 21st, 2005, 04:19 PM
Search tags for this page
cartels taking over texas
, drug cartels taking over texas
, drug cartels taking over texas farmers land
, middle-eastern taking over texas
, the cartels in texas mexico boardertowns