UK Finally starts to talk about self defence
This is a discussion on UK Finally starts to talk about self defence within the Home (And Away From Home) Defense Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Guys
I need you to "help" the discussion on its way!!
David Cameron (possible new Prime Minister after May)
Is talking about making our laws ...
-
February 1st, 2010 12:03 PM
#1
Member
Array
UK Finally starts to talk about self defence
Guys
I need you to "help" the discussion on its way!!
David Cameron (possible new Prime Minister after May)
Is talking about making our laws easier, the comments are interesting and a lot of Americans have already posted, comments are at the end of the article....
'Burglars give up any human rights': David Cameron gets tough on right to defend home | Mail Online
Tint Bob (UK)
-
February 1st, 2010 12:03 PM
Remove Ads
-
February 1st, 2010 02:42 PM
#2
VIP Member
Array
Under existing laws, homeowners are allowed to use only ‘reasonable’ force to tackle a burglar. The Tory proposals would strengthen the law so they would face prosecution only for using ‘grossly disproportionate’ force.
A step in the right direction, at least.
In my own state, Oregon, the "reasonable man" type standards aren't so very different than that used in the UK. Scary thought, given how the UK abuses the term to within an inch of its life, practically presuming you are the criminal if you're left standing. Think it couldn't happen here, in the USA? Caution is due.
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
Thoughts: Justifiable self defense.
Explain: How does
disarming victims
reduce the number of victims?
Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
NRA, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

-
February 1st, 2010 02:52 PM
#3
VIP Member
Array
It's all talk until the people say they want it so and .....literally..... sue for that change of direction. Good Luck.
"Just getting a concealed carry permit means you haven't commited a crime yet. CCP holders commit crimes." Daniel Vice, senior attorney for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, quoted on Fox & Friends, 8 Jul, 2008
(Sometimes) "a fight avioded is a fight won." ... claude clay
-
February 1st, 2010 03:32 PM
#4
Senior Member
Array
It's funny, but British and American self-defense laws aren't all that different. It's mostly who constitutes a "reasonable man" that's different.
-
February 1st, 2010 09:04 PM
#5
Distinguished Member
Array
That word reasonable is always under scrutiny and always will be. They keep trying to describe what is reasonable. One day reasonable will be that your dead on the floor of your own home and your murderer didn't work up a sweat doing you in.
"I dislike death, however, there are some things I dislike more than death. Therefore, there are times when I will not avoid danger" Mencius"
-
February 12th, 2010 09:33 AM
#6
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
SamRudolph
It's funny, but British and American self-defense laws aren't all that different. It's mostly who constitutes a "reasonable man" that's different.
I would say not true in the realistic sense. No castle doctrine, duty to retreat, duty to not escalate deadliness of response (i.e. no gun if BG has knife, etc.). Too many cases of homewoner getting arrested and slammed, while BG walks.
-
February 12th, 2010 01:06 PM
#7
Member
Array
I agree with you Rustynuts. We were briefed once I got stationed in England how the self defense laws were different. We could basically ask a guy to leave our home if he broke in, can you imagine that. They say "reasonable force" can be used like tackling the guy, however, if you hurt him while tackling him then I'd be in trouble as well. Their laws are nothing like ours.
-
March 7th, 2010 01:12 AM
#8
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Tint Bob
BIG SURPRISE! But how are people going to defend themselves w/o means of defense?
With furniture? Like living room chairs? Or are they all required to join cricket club so that they can legally use cricket bats as impromptu self-defense tool? LOL!
-
March 7th, 2010 04:00 AM
#9
Distinguished Member
Array
The responses from those supposed "civil liberties campaigners" were utterly disgusting. Those people are the ones who should get a good beat-down from some burglars who they can only "ask" to leave and see if they continue spouting off that stupidity.
-
March 7th, 2010 12:02 PM
#10
Member
Array
Brings to mind the old saying, "A Neo-Conservative is a Liberal who was mugged last night".
Life is too short to be serious!
-
March 7th, 2010 08:39 PM
#11
Distinguished Member
Array
We had a mainstream newspaper talk about self-defense in a almost resonable manner. The hardcore left can't hide the fact that bad guys are hurting innocent people in their homes and people are getting fed up.
-
March 28th, 2010 04:49 PM
#12
Member
Array
It's a tragedy, but Brits gave away their rights when they permitted themselves to be disarmed. Great Britain is now the "slave state" Obama envisions for the US.
-
March 31st, 2010 08:14 PM
#13
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Rustynuts
I would say not true in the realistic sense. No castle doctrine, duty to retreat, duty to not escalate deadliness of response (i.e. no gun if BG has knife, etc.). Too many cases of homewoner getting arrested and slammed, while BG walks.
You hit the nail on the head! What they need over there is the castle doctrine and several boat loads of imported firearms to give their Subjects the possibility of being Citizens!
-
March 31st, 2010 09:00 PM
#14
VIP Member
Array
Just think of how many firearms have been deactivated in the time the U.K. has criminalized the public ownership of firearms: click. Browning Hi-Powers, 1911 pistols, rifles of all sorts. On that list, there's even a Browning BDM, which shows how far into the barrel they've dug.
Hopefully sanity will prevail at some point. I'd like to think that the mentality that results in only criminals being armed cannot last forever.
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
Thoughts: Justifiable self defense.
Explain: How does
disarming victims
reduce the number of victims?
Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
NRA, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

-
March 31st, 2010 09:46 PM
#15
VIP Member
Array
Why doesn't he run for President over here? We have a pretty good head start on the weapons issue in this Country, it would be nice to have an individual in the "Top Office" that understands our take on things.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By First Sgt in forum Defensive Books, Video & References
Replies: 2
Last Post: February 23rd, 2010, 07:47 PM
-
By Fenris in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 6
Last Post: June 21st, 2009, 08:01 PM
-
By operator0 in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 12
Last Post: March 9th, 2009, 10:56 AM
-
By LockNLoad in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
Replies: 3
Last Post: December 19th, 2007, 03:06 PM
-
By P95Carry in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Replies: 9
Last Post: August 21st, 2005, 06:27 PM
Search tags for this page
david cameron home defense