Why aren't we using artillery more?

Why aren't we using artillery more?

This is a discussion on Why aren't we using artillery more? within the Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Saw some demos of the new HOWITZER. They can put 5 rounds on target at the same time. If this is less expensive then a ...

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Member Array Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    334

    Why aren't we using artillery more?

    Saw some demos of the new HOWITZER. They can put 5 rounds on target at the same time. If this is less expensive then a cruse missile why don't we utilize it more? Is it lack of friendly territory or range? Not as high tech as a missile but it gets the job done at a fraction of the cost. Same thing with battleships vs. missile frigates.
    -Diplomacy: The art of saying nice dogie until you can find a rock.
    -The truth is a three edged sword.
    -Your brain is your primary weapon everything else is just a tool.
    -When the only tool you have is a hammer then everything starts to look like a nail.


  2. #2
    Senior Member Array tegemu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Orange Park, Fla.
    Posts
    997
    What makes you think we are not using it?
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence in their behalf. - George Orwell

  3. #3
    VIP Member Array Bud White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Away - Health Problems
    Posts
    17,353
    Good Question Maybe to hard to get where they need it fast .. unlike a missile you can shoot from way way out and Laser guide in?

    Im just guessing here

  4. #4
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    Saw that gun detailed a while ago - clever stuff. Mobile unit IIRC.

    Rapid rate of fire for its size and each round is changed for trajectory and range so a whole bundle coincide and hit a small target area together.

    Unsure as yet whether ''officially'' in service tho.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  5. #5
    Member Array Pickpocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    241
    1. Limited Range
    2. Requires use of a Forward Observer
    3. Collateral damage
    4. Did I mention limited range?


    They're only good for about 30km - which, while it sounds like a lot, only translates to about 18 miles. They have to be moved by either CH-53 SuperStallion or by the new 7-ton truck, which takes time.

    A Forward Observer (FO) is required in order walk the rounds on target. The first round is hardly ever going to be dead on and since the arty guys are miles away you need someone within line-of-sight to relay the adjustments.

    Like I said, the first round or two aren't usually going to be dead-on..so you've got collateral damage to worry about.

    Artillery IS being used, it just has very limited application at this point. I can't speak as to whether the "new" gun is being "officially" used or not....that's out of my sphere of knowledge.

  6. #6
    VIP Member
    Array srfl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    6,870
    There are precision-guided arty shells....the 155mm Excaliber is one, but they aren't cheap, nor widely deployed.
    USAF: Loving Our Obscene Amenities Since 1947

  7. #7
    VIP Member
    Array Team American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,826
    Easier and quicker to call in an F-16 with a laser guided 500 pounder...just ask the Zark-man
    "I surrounded 'em"- Alvin York

    "They're ain't many troubles that a man can't fix with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six"- Jeff Cooper

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array Weeg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    529
    Quote Originally Posted by Team American
    Easier and quicker to call in an F-16 with a laser guided 500 pounder...just ask the Zark-man
    Pocket is spot-on...

    Also...

    Artillery is quick, given the BGs are in range...

    Quicker to call in a fire mission than have an F-16 on a CAP far away having to haul a-- to your location (the planes for Zarq were diverted from a CAP somewhere else).

    Part of any Operations Order is also "Service and Support"...If planned well, you usually know what assets (Arty, Air, MEDEVAC, etc) are available to you before a mission.

    .

  9. #9
    Member Array Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    334
    Point taken. I guess we aren't really in a conventional war. Even though we are holding ground, its asymmetrical nowadays. And even if we were the press isn't as embedded as much recently. It just seemed that an advanced artillery shell is still more cost effective then a cruse missile
    -Diplomacy: The art of saying nice dogie until you can find a rock.
    -The truth is a three edged sword.
    -Your brain is your primary weapon everything else is just a tool.
    -When the only tool you have is a hammer then everything starts to look like a nail.

  10. #10
    Lead Moderator
    Array rstickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    21,860
    Quote Originally Posted by Bryan
    It just seemed that an advanced artillery shell is still more cost effective then a cruse missile
    I'm not sure I'd bet on that either. The arty shells have a lot less room for electronics and sensors. They also under go a lot higher G and centrifugal loads during firing. My guess is they don't work nearly as well as a guided bomb or cruse missile.
    Rick

    EOD - Initial success or total failure

  11. #11
    VIP Member Array Rob72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    OK
    Posts
    3,468
    Quote Originally Posted by rstickle
    I'm not sure I'd bet on that either. The arty shells have a lot less room for electronics and sensors. They also under go a lot higher G and centrifugal loads during firing. My guess is they don't work nearly as well as a guided bomb or cruse missile.
    Don't remember all the info, but the Navy was getting a good start with a new generation of sabot rounds for the 16" Iowa class, in the '80s. 50km+, and early version of the "guided round", IIRC. Missiles are great, and arty does have inherent limitations, but nothing generates the terror of big guns. A little terror goes a loooong way...... We aren't barbarians, though.

  12. #12
    Member Array Bryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    334
    Speak softly and carry a big stick. Gun boat diplomacy :)
    -Diplomacy: The art of saying nice dogie until you can find a rock.
    -The truth is a three edged sword.
    -Your brain is your primary weapon everything else is just a tool.
    -When the only tool you have is a hammer then everything starts to look like a nail.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Array Tom357's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Richmond VA
    Posts
    1,068
    The cost of the shell, itself, my not come anywhere near the cost of a cruise missle, but the cost of getting the artillery in place, and keeping it there, with all the attendant personnel, equipment and logistical support, might. A cruise missle or smart bomb, launched from a platform that is already deployed and on station, is a much more efficient use of resources in many circumstances.
    - Tom
    You have the power to donate life.

  14. #14
    VIP Member Array Old Chief's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Southwest Tennessee
    Posts
    10,634
    Being a retired sailor I can not speak to the 105's effectiveness nor its cost per round on target but I do know that the Navy does not have active duty Battleships. The technology is just too old. We have newer and better ways to deliver the firepower where and when needed. Not necessarily economically programmed.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Things aren't always as they appear
    By Pepsi in forum Carry & Defensive Scenarios
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: March 31st, 2010, 07:37 AM
  2. Oops...Misfired artillery crashes into girl's bed
    By JonInNY in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: April 13th, 2008, 05:34 PM
  3. I bet these aren't available to us....too bad....
    By goawayfarm in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 27th, 2008, 06:43 PM
  4. Naw, kid, brakes aren't important...
    By The Tourist in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 5th, 2005, 11:17 PM

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» DefensiveCarry Sponsors