This is a discussion on Bloody Roots Of Jihad within the Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; The Free Congress Commentary By Paul M. Weyrich Uninformed Westerners could hardly be blamed for taking comfort in the words spoken by an Islamic television ...
The Free Congress Commentary
By Paul M. Weyrich
Uninformed Westerners could hardly be blamed for taking comfort in the
words spoken by an Islamic television newsman shortly after the massacre
that took place at the Russian school in Beslan. \"It is a certain fact
that not all Muslims are terrorists, but it is equally certain, and
exceptionally painful, that almost all terrorists are Muslims,\" asserted
Abdel Rahman al-Rashed, General Manager of a popular satellite television
Rashed cited terrorist incident after terrorist incident perpetrated by
Muslims. \"The majority of those who manned the suicide bombings against
buses, vehicles, schools, houses and buildings all over the world were
Muslim,\" he stated in a commentary.
That\'s not the only vigorous condemnation expressed in the Arab news
media about the tragedy in Beslan. Khaled Hamed al-Suleiman, a columnist
in the Saudi Arabian daily Okaz, presented a strong indictment of the
Beslan killers for having \"turned today\'s Islam into something having to do
with decapitations, the slashing of throats, abducting innocent civilians
and exploding people. The time has come for Muslims to be the first to
come out against those interested in abducting Islam in the same way they
abducted innocent children. This is the true jihad these days, and this is
our obligation, as believing Muslims, toward our monotheistic religion.\"
Many Westerners will welcome those statements. They should, in fact, do
so. They should also realize the limits of those sentiments in a world
where technology combined with the sentiments of jihad can empower a very
small number of people to do a great deal of damage.
Free Congress Foundation Adjunct Fellow Robert Spencer, the author of two
books about Islam and the monographs An Introduction to the Qur\'an and
Jihad in Context: Beyond Political Correctness, What the Qur\'an Really
Says, does not cast doubt upon the sincerity of the opinions expressed by
these commentators, but argues that such statements are nothing more than a
palliative aimed at reassuring Westerners that everything will soon be
fine. Spencer readily admits that many Muslims are indeed peaceful souls
who harbor goodwill to their fellow man. However, in their willingness to
recast their religion and its history toward one that reflects their own
personal outlook, they end up overlooking or not understanding the true
meaning of jihad.
\"No one talks about the root causes, the ideology that gives rise to the
terrorism. No one addresses why this is happening,\" says Spencer whose
works expose the bloody roots of the word jihad in the Islamic world.
Spencer notes that the Qur\'an, the Holy book of Islam, is vested by
Islamic scholars with even more authority than most Jewish or Christian
scholars would accord the Bible. Why? Islamic scholars believe the words
spoken in the Qur\'an were dictated by Allah himself, and filtered through
no human element whatsoever. Allah himself, in Sura 41:41-2, states:
\"This is a mighty scripture. Falsehood cannot reach if from before or from
behind.\" Muslims regard the Qur\'an on earth as a copy of the book that has
existed with Allah for all eternity.
There are passages in the Qur\'an that emphasize the importance of peace
and tolerance, but a broad tradition within Islamic theology maintains that
when there is contraction between verses, the chronologically later one
will take precedence. Disturbingly, then, the most violent of the Qur\'an\'s
chapters is Sura 9, which Spencer notes \"was the very last Sura to have
been revealed.\" It is the only Sura that does not commence by stating \"In
the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful.\" Sura 9:29 states:
\"Fight those who believe not Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that
forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor
acknowledge the religion of Truth (even if they are of the People of the
Book, until they pay the Jizya [the special tax on non-Muslims] with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.\"
There also is Sura 9:5. It states in unequivocal terms: \".when the
sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and
take them [captive], and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush.
But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave
their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.\" This indicates that
only non-believers must abandon their beliefs to embrace Islam or else
suffer the consequences, clearly violent, as indicated in this Sura.
Sahih Bukhari [Vol. 1, Book 2, No. 25], an influential and respected
source of traditions about Muhammad, quotes Muhammad saying: \"I have been
ordered [by Allah] to fight against the people until they testify that none
has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger
of Allah, and perform As-Salat [prayers] and give Zakat [obligatory
charity], so if they perform all that, then they save their lives and
properties from me except for Islamic laws, and their reckoning will be
The statements from the Qur\'an and Muhammad represent the fuel that
powers Islamic extremism today. Some within Islam have mustered up the
courage to denounce what is happening; indeed, one leading French
journalist, Gilles Kepel, has just published a book, The War for Muslim
Minds, arguing that the jihadists are faltering, their tactics proving to
be counterproductive. Spencer argues to the contrary, \"Kepel was saying it
in 2002 in a book then, and now he is saying it again in another.
Unfortunately, the facts don\'t bear him out. He doesn\'t mention the many
places where jihadists are advancing, including Indonesia, the Philippines,
Thailand, Kashmir, Chechnya and Nigeria. He may be right that the Muslim
masses are alienated, but they have no spokesman and no leg to stand on in
Even if there were a reformation of sorts within the Islamic world, it
would not mean an end to strife against the West. It would not bring about
peace. It would only increase this strife as the differences between Islam
and the West would be thrown into even greater relief. Islamic extremists
would only increase in hatred for the West for diluting what they view to
be the purity of their religion. It\'s good that respected media
commentators within the Islamic world are starting to acknowledge the truth
about what is occurring. Even if they acknowledged the truth that lies
behind the surface, it does not guarantee any decisive turning point in
relations between the Islamic world and the West. That means the incident
in Beslan may be only the most recent of more such bloody events to come.
Paul M. Weyrich is Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.