2Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksIf you are former or current military, law enforcement, check out this website: Oath Keepers » Oath Keepers – Guardians of the Republic
This is a discussion on oath keepers within the Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; If you are former or current military, law enforcement, check out this website: Oath Keepers » Oath Keepers – Guardians of the Republic...
Array
If you are former or current military, law enforcement, check out this website: Oath Keepers » Oath Keepers – Guardians of the Republic
This comes up here periodically.Originally Posted by dlbrown75
If you are a member of the military you have taken ONE oath; and you should not be taking secondary oaths, especially when those secondary oaths imply that you might not obey lawful orders.
These secondary oaths are sowing ideas of sedition within the ranks. Sedition is punishable.
"Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war."
John Adams. Second President of the United States.
Array
This has been discussed at length.
I fail to see how an oath promotes sedition. This oath just seems to reinforce the first.
If anything, it's a redundant oath.
Trust in God and keep your powder dry
"A heavily armed citizenry is not about overthrowing the government; it is about preventing the government from overthrowing liberty. A people stripped of their right of self defense is defenseless against their own government." -source
Array
I do not see how a person taking an oath stating that he will obey the original oath he took could be considered sedition. However I do see how someone who believes the oath he took when he went to work for the government was only a formality and means nothing might see it that way.
Michael
If it were merely redundant, there would be no point and no one would be pushing the idea. It isn't merely redundant.
One oath; the present one prescribed by law is quite sufficient thank you.
"Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war."
John Adams. Second President of the United States.
Array
The Bill of Rights was also redundant and would be totally unnecessary if the government obeyed the Constitution.
Michael
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
