USMC Snipers May Be In Trouble
This is a discussion on USMC Snipers May Be In Trouble within the Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I personally do not care if our Marines take a porkchop & bacon dump on dead insurgents. But, we live in a new world where ...
January 12th, 2012 02:05 PM
I personally do not care if our Marines take a porkchop & bacon dump on dead insurgents. But, we live in a new world where information bounces all across the globe in a matter of seconds.
You HAVE to keep this in mind now. They didn't and they're gonna pay big time.
January 12th, 2012 02:05 PM
January 12th, 2012 02:05 PM
I'm not against our current involvement in the Middle East, but this is a war that we have taken to them. Just because they do things does not mean we should lower our standards and practices to their level.
Originally Posted by bolocanolo
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.
January 12th, 2012 02:05 PM
Not that I believe this to be "right", but the only one(s) who should be punished is the one who took the video and the one(s) who published it. If you have never been in combat you may not understand.
LEARN something today so you can TEACH something tomorrow.
Where is the wisdom that we have lost in knowledge?" T.S. Elliot
Dominus Vobiscum <))>(
January 12th, 2012 02:13 PM
This is COMPLETELY unacceptable, why did they let this photographer anywhere near this event?
War is hell!
I always find it amazing that 'bleeding hearts' want to make a big deal out of such an episode, but when the enemy takes our troops and hangs them on bridges to burn their bodies or cuts their heads off while still alive...oh, well that's just war?
While I do understand the higher standards we should uphold, I do not see much of a story here...call me cold-hearted, I guess.
Our military can take care of this internally...story over!
"That I cannot do."
"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
January 12th, 2012 02:26 PM
The only issue I have here is that when they swore their oath, they agreed to live by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and further, Marines pride themselves in keeping themselves held to a higher standard and honor. I have two sons in the Marines and one in the Navy.
urinating on a dead body would basically be desecrating the body, perhaps not by real physical damage, but it is still an act that we, hopefully living under a higher set of moral values, should not stoop to committing.
Our enemies often have no problem committing atrocities. We, as a people, should not allow ourselves to be dragged down to their level.
However, war has a way of bringing out the worst in any person, especially when you see day in and day out what evils are actually out there in the world.
I do not worry that this will make the Taliban or Al Queda hate us any more than they already do. We are infidels in their eyes and deserve whatever they do to us.
What I will say is that I don't ever seem to hear any of the leaders of Pakistan, Afganistan and all of the Arabian/Muslim world coming out in the headlines decrying every last barbaric act committed against non-muslims in the name of Islam and demanding they all be brought to justice for their crimes. Makes one go, "Hmmmmmmmm....."
Oh, and as to atrocities, check the Old testament: Then Saul said, ‘Thus shall you say to David, “The king desires no marriage present except a hundred foreskins of the Philistines, that he may be avenged on the king’s enemies”‘. [1 Samuel 18:20-25 (NRSV)] I doubt that they were taken from Philistines after a Brit milah..... O_o
January 12th, 2012 02:26 PM
We should have just killed them all, bred their woman, and declared it the 51st and 52nd states. Built a Protestant and Catholic church and opened up a Starbucks and McDonalds.
Then asked who wants to be the next country to harm one hair on one Americans head, cause your next.
Ignorance is a long way from stupid, but left unchecked, can get there real fast.
January 12th, 2012 02:28 PM
Originally Posted by suntzu
I must be in the minority, and that's ok. Just to address what I personally teach my children...
While I teach my children about love, respect, discipline...and show them by example....I also teach them with equal resolution the cold hard facts of life. Life is tough, people are mean. You have to be even more mean (at certain times) to survive and to come out on top.
I have two daughters. If I accomplish my goal...neither will ever be a victim.
I am a combat vet, LEO, 2nd degree black belt in Aikido. As I said before, while I may pass for "Joe Normal"...I know how harsh this world is and what it takes to survive and what it will take to survive the coming decades.
Both of my daughters will be black belts by 9. Both will be proficiently trained in handguns and rifles by 13. I guess not many others would teach their 4 year old the "alternate" use for a #2 pencil if a stranger approaches her when mommy & daddy aren't around. When she gets to grade school and starts using pens I will teach her the effectiveness of a Bic to the jugular.
So in short...would I teach my children it is ok to piss on the enemy in war? Yes. There is no room for weakness in this world. It takes a balance of compassion and cruelty to survive.
January 12th, 2012 02:47 PM
I gave a like because at least I think I know where you are coming from. But this is where I guess I am a stickler for facts because it does make a difference in different situations. The contractors that were burned and hung from a bridge was done Sunni insurgents. We said we went to war against Saddam to liberate the Iraqi people. We made enemies of the Iraqi people and allowed Iranian and Al Queda influence into the country which contributed to that incident and others. (it all started as a low key religous civil war brought by us.) Afghanistan is totally different. We went into Afghanistan with the intent to overthrow the Taliban government. The Taliban are fighting back to take over the country.) Again, we made enemy's out of them. Just stating facts, not supporting any of this.
Originally Posted by retsupt99
January 12th, 2012 02:57 PM
I really hope you are kidding. Iraq never harmed an American first before either Desert Storm, negates that. The Taliban did allow Al Queda to use Afghanistan as a bas of operations. It is not the haven it once was and the Taliban are not a threat to the US. So we should have been out of there a long time ago. And by your rational about retaliation, Sudan should attack us (we launched a Tomahawk missile against them saying they precursors for WMD's which they did not), Pananma (so we invade countries to arrest people), Libya bombing (supposed to be in retaliation for Berlin Disco terrorist bombing, later found out Libya had nothing to do with it), I won't list every Balkan state, that would take all day, Somalia, (when did they harm an American for us to be there). We seem as a nation to be upset at our enemies when we were the aggressor.
Originally Posted by glockman10mm
We don't have to ask who wants to be next...it appears we pick them by lot.
Those are cold hard facts, not from a left wing fruit cake rag of a magazine.
You ask who is next...what about Iran. Sure.
January 12th, 2012 05:54 PM
Well I was a Marine infantryman, I did a tour in Iraq, and a tour in Afghanistan. I lost friends overseas. I was in multiple firefights. I never felt the urge to urinate on any enemy war dead. Neither did anyone else in my unit.
Originally Posted by Mattmann
Bottom line is that the act violated orders, which are made clear to everyone upon arrival in country. Any enemy dead are to be treated with respect. Marine infantryman are expected to be professional warriors (the sniper rifle makes it clear these are grunts), they were not acting as professionals IMO.
Anyone who thinks this is okay should go read about what a strategic corporal is.
Fortes Fortuna Juvat
Former, USMC 0311, OIF/OEF vet
NRA Pistol/Rifle/Shotgun/Reloading Instructor, RSO, Ohio CHL Instructor
January 12th, 2012 06:50 PM
All of them have had the appropriate briefings. They knew the propraganda risks of this. They should have known better? And on top of it all a photographer to document this, good grief?
Hope it does not cause another beheading from these animals.
My WI. CCW Permit Statistics
Applied & Hand delivered to DOJ: 11/01/2011
Check # 4548 Cleared: .............. 11/07/2011
Permit #39 received via USPS: .... 11/02/2011
January 12th, 2012 08:08 PM
These Marines were not in the heat of battle when they did this act.
Originally Posted by A_666_K9
That is spoken like a Marine that I have always pictured.
Originally Posted by Elk Hunter
We are American soldiers/Marines, not middle eastern animals.
Originally Posted by WD54241
Unrinating on dead enemy combatants have nothing to do with survival. They were already dead. They posed no threat. They were killed, dead, laying on the ground. They should have simply been mostly ignored until disposed of.
Originally Posted by NYCrulesU
Last edited by HotGuns; January 12th, 2012 at 10:27 PM.
Reason: langauge workaround
“I am consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry.”
- Barack Obama Chicago Tribune, April 27, 2004
January 12th, 2012 08:09 PM
Those Marines picked a very bad time for their stunt and video. The US is backing a power sharing deal between Karzai and the Taliban: It's related to the withdrawl from Afghanistan strategy. Recently Biben said the Taliban is not the enemy: Duh.
Pentagon condemns Marines
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta on Thursday harshly condemned alleged behavior in a video that appears to show U.S. Marines urinating on the corpses of Taliban fighters. The Pentagon chief said he'd ordered a full investigation into the alleged incident, which comes amid sensitive diplomatic initiatives to try to advance reconciliation talks with the Taliban.
January 12th, 2012 08:10 PM
Well I sure dont have a problem with a sniper team showing thier contempt and disrespect for the enemy..They can do what ever they want with them...Hope the enemy fears them...Imagine the enemy these juys missed grousing about thier mates getting urinated on....really...What if the reality is that the spin-up over their "outrageous" act gets these guys a hot shower and messhall food ??..and they are ok with that??..what if they are really good at what they do...really ...sniper teams turn the enemy into meat and every one (lots and lots of politicans at least) is SO outraged about the team urinated on them...nothing has been said about the grief those urinated bodys represent.....thats just crazy...what if that sniper team is doing what is expected by the locals...because they hated and dispised by everyone breathing god's good air....if I was there I'd been sure those men got well hydrated, and didnt lack for anything I could provide...and the cleanest spot in that vid is the deadmans chest
Last edited by HotGuns; January 12th, 2012 at 10:26 PM.
Reason: language workaround
January 12th, 2012 10:38 PM
Back in the day when you could actually tell a man from a woman and not have to argue about, we wouldnt have wasted time taking a whiz on them, it would just dry off eventually.
We would have just cut their heads off and put them on a stick. We didnt care if the weenies in this world got offended or not. They werent the ones out there doing the shooting, so their opinions meant nothing.
Search tags for this page
how much trouble are snipers in
marine sniper pee
marine sniper piss
marine snipers piss
marine snipers piss on
snipers in trouble
snipers pee on taliban
snipers piss on taliban
Click on a term to search for related topics.