Army Chief of Staff Argues to Use Army for Domestic Enforcement - no Posse Comitatus
This is a discussion on Army Chief of Staff Argues to Use Army for Domestic Enforcement - no Posse Comitatus within the Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; CFR & U.S. Army Chief of Staff: Use Army for Domestic Enforcement
Written by Joe Wolverton, II
New American
Monday, 04 June 2012 00:00
The ...
34Likes
-
June 4th, 2012 06:29 PM
#1
VIP Member
Array
Army Chief of Staff Argues to Use Army for Domestic Enforcement - no Posse Comitatus
CFR & U.S. Army Chief of Staff: Use Army for Domestic Enforcement
Written by Joe Wolverton, II
New American
Monday, 04 June 2012 00:00
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) proposes that the U.S. Army be used to plan, command, and carry out (with the help of civilian law enforcement) domestic police missions. So says a story appearing in the May/June issue of the influential organization’s official journal, Foreign Affairs. The article lacks a single reference to the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits such actions.
My Comments: 1) As soon as Posse Comitatus is ignored (there have already been test cases of this outside of two US ARMY bases - armed US ARMY MPs stepping in and working with LEO to arrest who were Regular Army and not National Guard, in the last two years), 2) Every gun seller in the US will immediately have all records reviewed and catalogued to creat a complete list of US Gun Owners (regardless of state law and privicy issues - already been tested in AK case being held up in Federal Courts), 3) You can throw the 4thA and 5thA out the window. Indefinite detention of US Citizens has already been 'legalized' through Presidential Executive Orders and this years Congressional Passing of the US Miliary Funding Bill (all the info is out there).
Too many items in this article to excerpt here. Better if you read and come to your own conclusions: CFR & U.S. Army Chief of Staff: Use Army for Domestic Enforcement
Related: The Age Of Drones: Military May Be Using Drones In US To Help Police: http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/...o-help-police/
Last edited by JD; June 18th, 2012 at 12:30 PM.
Reason: Added link to second article on use of Military Drones in US
-
June 4th, 2012 06:29 PM
Remove Ads
-
June 4th, 2012 07:55 PM
#2
Distinguished Member
Array
This actually has happened domestically, with a LEA using a military drone aircraft to help them locate a criminal.
"He is a wellspring of truth, but you can't bring the whole well up with one bucket." -Mark Twain's Mother (Jane Lampton Clemens)
-
June 4th, 2012 08:04 PM
#3
Member
Array
I don't doubt that there will be an extreme push to get the military involved in civilian enforcement, which scares the hell outta me.
The police' mission : Serve and Protect
The Military's mission : Kill people and break things.
There is a reason our forefathers feared the redcoats showing up at the door.
-
June 4th, 2012 10:07 PM
#4
VIP Member
Array
Not being a premium member I could only read part of General O's article. Can you provide direct quotes from the General as to what specific police actions he is proposing active duty military troops be involved in? In the past there have been a number of articles where people have claimed that military units have been tasked with all kind of things that simply aren't true.
I don't know the man personally (only met him once) but I have friends that worked under him for several months and they speak very highly of him.
As far as the drones go, that is a little behind the times. Two drones were made available to the task force hunting for John Mohammed and Lee Malvo.
Infowars- Proving David Hannum right on a daily basis
-
June 4th, 2012 10:45 PM
#5
VIP Member
Array
Saw a article today where drones are being used by the EPA to check out cattle ranches.
Here it is:
http://www.infowars.com/epa-using-dr...aska-and-iowa/
Last edited by Spirit51; June 5th, 2012 at 07:05 AM.
Reason: add article
A woman must not depend on protection by men. A woman must learn to protect herself.
Susan B. Anthony

A armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one has to back it up with his life.
Robert Heinlein

-
June 4th, 2012 11:21 PM
#6
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Spirit51
Saw a article today where drones are being used by the EPA to check out cattle ranches.
What for?
A 9mm might expand but a .45 will never shrink enough to fit 17 in the magazine.
-
June 4th, 2012 11:36 PM
#7
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Spirit51
Saw a article today where drones are being used by the EPA to check out cattle ranches.
Unless they are armored, I'd yell out "PULL!" and then, BLAMMO. Do you think it would scatter like a clay pidgeon?
-
June 4th, 2012 11:39 PM
#8
Senior Moderator
Array
To check that the emissions from cattle do not exceed federal standards for explosive gases.
To check that cattle manure does not exceed federal limits for hazardous waste limits per acre of ground.
To see that consumption of water cattle in various creeks,rivers or ponds does not exceed maximum permissible intake of water.
To otherwise harass farmers with unknown and bogus laws to increase government revenue.
To assist the EPA with enforcement and fines in accordance with property owned and taxed.
To ensure that illegal aliens have free pass to do as they please without interference from land owners.
It is better to live one day as a lion, than a thousand years as a lamb...
AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
Maker of cool things to shoot
-
June 4th, 2012 11:51 PM
#9
Senior Member
Array
Not trying to start anything here but can somebody tell me the difference between a Sheriff's department helicopter or city police helicopter flying over your house Vs a drone. Other than one has a pilot and the other doesn't I don't see much difference unless we are talking about a perceived safety issue.
Where I live it's not unusual to see the "Ghetto Hawk" buzzing around on a Saturday night....
To sit back hoping that someday, some way, someone will make things right is to go on feeding the crocodile, hoping he will eat you last - but eat you he will.
Ronald Reagan
-
June 5th, 2012 12:14 AM
#10
Member
Array
It's not murder if you shoot down an unmanned drone.....
-
June 5th, 2012 01:24 AM
#11
Senior Member
Array
Army Chief of Staff Argues to Use Army for Domestic Enforcement - no Posse Comitatus
This has already happened in our nation's history, it was called the 'Civil War'. The president simply issued orders or directives and very few dared to speak out against it. Sound familiar?
...he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36
USN/VET; NRA; GOA, jpfo.org
Life in a Jar: The Irena Sendler Project
www.irenasendler.com
-
June 5th, 2012 02:18 AM
#12
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
gigamortis
It's not murder if you shoot down an unmanned drone.....
It may be it that drone crashes into someone's home and kills the occupants.

Retired USAF E-8. Avatar is OldVet from days long gone - 1978. Oh, to be young again...
Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... "For What It's Worth" Buffalo Springfield
-
June 5th, 2012 02:48 AM
#13
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
gigamortis
It's not murder if you shoot down an unmanned drone.....
Wait 'till the drones start shooting back. That is the path we are on.
__________________________________
'Clinging to my guns and religion
-
June 5th, 2012 03:13 AM
#14
VIP Member
Array
Just think how it would be if they didn't like us!!!!!
"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." 
--Thomas B. Reed, American Attorney
Second Amendment -- Established December 15, 1791 and slowly eroded ever since
What happened to "..... shall not be infringed."
-
June 5th, 2012 03:37 AM
#15
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Rotorblade
Not trying to start anything here but can somebody tell me the difference between a Sheriff's department helicopter or city police helicopter flying over your house Vs a drone. Other than one has a pilot and the other doesn't I don't see much difference unless we are talking about a perceived safety issue.
Where I live it's not unusual to see the "Ghetto Hawk" buzzing around on a Saturday night....

There is a big difference if it belongs to DOD and there is not authorization to use it to assist LE.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
army chief of staff military used for police actions
, powered by mybb at home moms
, powered by mybb circle justice
, powered by mybb delusion
, powered by mybb fortune list
, powered by mybb general north
, powered by mybb history of alaska
, powered by mybb history of united states
, powered by mybb law
, powered by mybb military general orders
, powered by mybb oregon state
, powered by mybb people photography
, powered by mybb state department
, powered by mybb state farm
, powered by mybb state of oregon