"Study finds stray-bullet shootings frequently harm women and children"
This is a discussion on "Study finds stray-bullet shootings frequently harm women and children" within the Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; Why this is coming across the Homeland Security News Wire as breaking news is beyond me, but the report, "Study finds stray-bullet shootings frequently harm ...
8Likes
-
July 11th, 2012 04:50 PM
#1
Member
Array
"Study finds stray-bullet shootings frequently harm women and children"
Why this is coming across the Homeland Security News Wire as breaking news is beyond me, but the report, "Study finds stray-bullet shootings frequently harm women and children" is something I recall reading about at least a year ago.
One need look no further than the backers and producers of this "study" to discern where they're going with it.
The biggest issue I have is the pitch, "…nearly one-third of the victims [of stray bullet injuries or deaths] were children and nearly half were female….," somehow implying a disproportionate number of victims are women and kids when the math actually shows two-third of the victims were not kids and better than half were male.
Might the authors be happier if all the victims were middle-aged men? Frankly, that would be news because it could demonstrate that stray bullets were somehow discriminatory.
A secondary issue I have is that the age and gender of the victims is irrelevant to the problem. Because none of the victims -- young, old, male or female -- were intended targets, because guns and bullets don't possess conscious thought or deliberate motives, and particularly because the majority of urban, gun-toting criminals are simply bad shots. I don't know what it implies about the noted hunting incidents except perhaps that it appears there are an unfortunate number of hunters who don't practice gun safety. Be that as it may, it stands to reason the ratio of stray-bullet victims is more or less proportional to the ratio of the general population, at least as far as gender and age are concerned.
"The release notes that to gather data for the study, Wintemute and his colleagues used Google and Yahoo! news alerting services and the news archives of GunPolicy.org to track stories published between March 2008 and February 2009 that contained the phrase “stray bullet.”
When a study uses the archives of an organization such as GunPolicy.org, an outfit decidedly dedicated to gun control, to collect it's data, a fishy study automatically becomes bogus.
It would not surprise me if this study "...by Garen Wintemute, professor of emergency medicine and director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at UC Davis School of Medicine and Medical Center..." was actually a project he had his grad students research, using the term loosely, on which he could slap his name and chalk up as a published paper for his credentials.
This so-called study is only a transparent attempt to ply the emotion of readers of the MSM, many of which will doubtless copy and paste this "press release" without even considering the validity of its claims, data and conclusions. It certainly sheds no light on anything.
I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.
-
July 11th, 2012 04:50 PM
Remove Ads
-
July 11th, 2012 04:52 PM
#2
Distinguished Member
Array
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable- JFK
-
July 11th, 2012 04:59 PM
#3
Ex Member
Array
the study points out that when the shooting states woman and children are slower to get out of the way and find cover.
-
July 11th, 2012 05:11 PM
#4
VIP Member
Array
In the general population in the USA, there are roughly 50% male and 50% female. So it would stand to reason that a random act like sending a stray shot skyward would, on average, end up striking females ~50% of the time. Let me guess ... it ends up striking males ~50% of the time, too. Sounds like "breaking" news to me. Statistics. Whew!
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
Thoughts: Justifiable self defense.
Explain: How does
disarming victims
reduce the number of victims?
Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
NRA, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

-
July 11th, 2012 05:16 PM
#5
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
ccw9mm
In the general population in the USA, there are roughly 50% male and 50% female. So it would stand to reason that a random act like sending a stray shot skyward would, on average, end up striking females ~50% of the time. Let me guess ... it ends up striking males ~50% of the time, too. Sounds like "breaking" news to me. Statistics. Whew!

97 males for every 100 females in the US to be exact. And that's my random fact for the day :/
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable- JFK
-
July 11th, 2012 05:17 PM
#6
Moderator
Array
In Detroit and Chicago, studies show that most of the shooters ARE children...I'm just sayin'...
"That I cannot do."
"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."
***********************************
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
-
July 11th, 2012 05:45 PM
#7
Member
Array
68% of statistics are made on the spot. Just sayin'.
I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.
(J.R.R.Tolkien [Faramir], The Two Towers
-
July 11th, 2012 05:53 PM
#8
Member
Array
"An unsophisticated forecaster uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts - for support rather than for illumination." -- Andrew Lang
...Adam
"If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart, and if you're not a conservative at 40, you have no head." --Winston Churchill
-
July 11th, 2012 06:17 PM
#9
Member
Array
I believe it. It's ball in the face factor.
You take a female to the park, gym, or sporting event, they are 80 times likelier to get smashed in the face with a loose ball than a male. I don't know how this happens but I've seen it so I'm making up the statistic.
-
July 11th, 2012 06:18 PM
#10
Senior Member
Array
It's horrific if it is a woman or child but it's ok if it's a man?
-
July 11th, 2012 06:38 PM
#11
VIP Member
Array
The facts have been tabulated, the results analyzed, and the conclusions, inescapable. Criminal assailants are, as a group, lousy shots.
Kahn Souphanousinphone, Sr. "I could be manic, could be depressed. Real crapshoot."
-
July 11th, 2012 06:45 PM
#12
VIP Member
Array
"Wearing body armor or taking other extreme protective measures is just not practical on a widespread scale, so we need to look at other ways to help communities feel safe from such evntse,” Wintemute said. “Given that these stray-bullet shootings are a byproduct of gun violence in general, it’s plausible that if you prevent the violence, you’ll prevent the stray-bullet shootings"
They should make thier Gang members take a Handgun Course
Would Solve EVERYTHING
H/D
A Native Floridian = RARE
IT'S OUR RIGHTS>THEY WANT TO WRONG

H/D
-
July 11th, 2012 09:18 PM
#13
VIP Member
Array
What definition are they using for "child" - anyone under 25 like a previous study?
Another study failure: Only incidents where someone was actually hurt were counted
"He defined stray-bullet shootings as episodes involving a bullet that escaped an intended sociogeographic space and injured at least one person, either from the gunshot itself or a secondary mechanism, such as an injury from glass sent flying by a bullet."
Interestingly, the same number of people are killed/injured, in the same proportion (killed/injured not m/f/c), by lightning each year (not kidding here).
Hey, yeah, let's send all the gangbangers to FrontSight with a free course certificate.
-
July 12th, 2012 12:35 AM
#14
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
hogdaddy
"Wearing body armor or taking other extreme protective measures is just not practical on a widespread scale, so we need to look at other ways to help communities feel safe from such evntse,” Wintemute said. “Given that these stray-bullet shootings are a byproduct of gun violence in general, it’s plausible that if you prevent the violence, you’ll prevent the stray-bullet shootings"
They should make thier Gang members take a Handgun Course

Would Solve EVERYTHING
H/D
....and get background checks....errrr....ummm...wait a minute

LEO/CHL

Certified Glock Armorer
not enough space for list, main gear: duty-G17, S&W 642 bug, 870, RRA AR-15; G30 off-duty
Independence is declared; it must be maintained. Sam Houston-3/2/1836
If loose gun laws are good for criminals why do criminals support gun control?
-
July 12th, 2012 03:52 AM
#15
VIP Member
Array
New study shows that statistics are not always statistically correct statistics...... Just saying.....
"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." 
--Thomas B. Reed, American Attorney
Second Amendment -- Established December 15, 1791 and slowly eroded ever since
What happened to "..... shall not be infringed."
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
arkansas stray bullet 2009
, children shot by stray bullets 2011 stats
, children stray bullets statistic
, harm by bullet
, how many people on average die from stray bullets on new years in detroit
, self defense stray bullet statistics
, statistical study of bullets
, stray bullet concealed carry
, stray bullet death self defense
, stray bullet death statistics
, stray bullet statistics
, stray-bullet shootings frequently harm women and children
, the stray bullets ratio in chicago versus detroit
, wintemute stray bullet
, women and harm in the military