July 18th, 2012 01:34 AM
I trust that the officer in this case will crusade for the victim's of all unjust shootings, whether committed by street criminals or law enforcement officers.
July 18th, 2012 06:28 AM
I can't understand how ANYONE who tries to kill another can be walking the streets in a few years. The more heinous and callous such attempts get to be, the clearer it seems that tossing out the "bad eggs" might be the only viable option.
"I just can't figure how someone who tries to kill a police officer can be walking the streets in a few years," he said. "This is our criminal justice system."
Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
self defense (A.O.J.).
How does disarming
the number of victims?
Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos)
NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.
July 18th, 2012 07:28 AM
Sentences don't seem to match the crimes....you would think a person attempts murder there wouldn't be much difference in the sentence fo if they had succeeded. The fact that he's a bad shot is the difference between life and a couple years. Intent was the same.
Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.
Guns are like sex and air...its no big deal until YOU can't get any.
July 18th, 2012 09:55 AM
Isn't this what has been wrong with our justice system since ...forever?
Murderers and rapists get the same sentencing as the guy growing some mary jane in his backyard (or maybe I should have described it vice-versa). The only difference is, the victim in this particular situation is LEO.
July 18th, 2012 10:22 AM
in bold:which should not even be an issue.....
Originally Posted by Lotus222
July 18th, 2012 11:39 AM
Officer was absolutely not out of line. The sentence was low for anyone being shot like that, not just a ploice officer.
Originally Posted by suntzu
The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it. Albert Einstein
"People in Arizona carry guns," said a Chandler police spokesman. "You better be careful about who you are picking on."
July 18th, 2012 01:50 PM
I agree with those that say the fact that the person being shot was a police officer should have no bearing on the sentence. A persons job description, race, sexual orientation or any other group membership should matter. The only thing we should be considering is that a person got shot and the shooter was not adequately punished.
July 18th, 2012 09:56 PM
Thanks for the link to the previous posting.
Originally Posted by suntzu
The reasoning, to me, is very simple. The LEO told the BG that he was a LEO, and if a scumbag will still attempt to murder an officer he sure as heck won't give two squats about an average Joe civilian. The BG thusly proves himself to be completely without a conscience and doubly unworthy of enjoying freedom.
While I do agree that the guy should get a harsh sentence no matter whom he tries to kill, this is one of the ways to enhance a less than perfect system. I personally believe that a scum like this deserves nothing more than a quick death.
"Historical examination of the right to bear arms, from English antecedents to the drafting of the Second Amendment, bears proof that the right to bear arms has consistently been, and should still be, construed as an individual right." -- U.S. District Judge Sam Cummings, Re: U.S. vs Emerson (1999)
Search tags for this page
cop is shot by military
mich. cop shot 5 times
mich. cop shot 5 times tells off judge
michigan cop shot 5 times tells off judge
michigan cop tells off judge
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors