Draft Army Handbook Controversy
Here: Draft Army Handbook Wades Into Divisive Afghan Issue - WSJ.com
I am at a loss to understand this, but it really irritates the nitswickenfrudenhaffen out of me. Am I wrong? Is this stupid PC and I should scream? Is this analogous to blaming the rape victim for their carriage or deportment?
The proposed Army handbook suggests that Western ignorance of Afghan culture, not Taliban infiltration, has helped drive the recent spike in deadly attacks by Afghan soldiers against the coalition forces.
I would like to hear what the great folks here think of the premise of the Draft Handbook.
Some of this just reads like some type of freshman level "Alternative Dispute Resolution" bologna spewed by some pot-smoking teary eyed moron born on the dark side of the moon. I swear, I shall weep.
But it has drawn criticism from U.S. Marine Gen. John Allen, the top military commander in Afghanistan, who aides said hasn't—and wouldn't—endorse the manual as written. Gen. Allen also rejected a proposed foreword that Army officials drafted in his name.
"Gen. Allen did not author, nor does he intend to provide, a foreword," said Col. Tom Collins, a spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan. "He does not approve of its contents."
I am just beside myself about this, and have been consumed about this issue all day while at lower altitudes.
The proposed handbook embraces a hotly debated theory that American cultural ignorance has sparked many so-called insider attacks—more than three dozen of which have claimed the lives of some 63 members of the U.S.-led coalition this year. The rise in insider attacks has created one of the biggest threats to American plans to end its major combat missions in Afghanistan next year and transfer full security control to Afghan forces in 2014.
Afghan leaders say Taliban infiltrators are responsible for most insider attacks. U.S. officials say the attacks are largely rooted in personal feuds between Afghan and coalition troops, though not necessarily the result of cultural insensitivity.
Last year, the U.S.-led coalition rejected an internal military study that concluded that cultural insensitivity was in part to blame for insider killings, which it called a growing threat that represented "a severe and rapidly metastasizing malignancy" for the coalition in Afghanistan.
The draft handbook uses Maj. Bordin's conclusions to psychologically prepare troops for serving in Afghanistan. A summary includes views of some U.S. soldiers that Afghan forces engage in thievery, are "gutless in combat," are "basically stupid," "profoundly dishonest," and engage in "treasonous collusion and alliances with enemy forces."
I don't want to criticize the Military or anyone in uniform, so tell me I'm wrong! Am I just going crazy? We hurt the tender feelings of this folks so they kill us? That explanation just doesn't wash. That dog don't hunt. I think somebody in Leavenworth fell off a turnip truck...................bless their hearts.............
The draft handbook offers a list of "taboo conversation topics" that soldiers should avoid, including "making derogatory comments about the Taliban," "advocating women's rights," "any criticism of pedophilia," "directing any criticism towards Afghans," "mentioning homosexuality and homosexual conduct" or "anything related to Islam."
Draft Army Handbook Controversy
You display a remarkable level of ignorance regarding tribal cultures with a long history of vicious blood feuds.
Yes, such people will kill you and any fictive kin you may claim over the most inconsequential slight.
And you absolutely CANNOT spot which ones will take this path just by looking