This is really sorry

This is a discussion on This is really sorry within the Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I have been watching the news today (FOX) the report is that, the two bombing suspects killed the MIT officer, just for his gun. If ...

Results 1 to 8 of 8
Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By ccw9mm
  • 2 Post By Old_Dog

Thread: This is really sorry

  1. #1
    Member Array the6shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    461

    This is really sorry

    I have been watching the news today (FOX) the report is that, the two bombing suspects killed the MIT officer, just for his gun.
    If this is true, what are the liberals thinking about disarming Americans.
    This WILL make LE officers even more of a target.

    I am not LE and don't aspire to be (too old). but this really stinks that this officer was just sitting in the cruiser at night, alone with his thoughts, killed because of his gun.

    All of the new england people, If armed would have put a hole in these guy's head, everyone of these people were on alert already.
    Now they are unprotected, legally

    This was not funny, and LE guy's watch your six, you never know whats lurking.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26,720
    Being armed and capable of withstanding attack ... remaining aware and alert ... avoiding being caught solo ... avoiding situations that could easily (predictably) be threatening (ie, stupid places/times/people). All good suggestions.

    Am assuming the cop shot wasn't with a partner, was caught unawares in the car, but that's an assumption. It's hard with cops, when they're so visible and their job is to be be out there.

    But it gets just as hard with citizens of any kind, when they're forcibly disarmed by those they hire, made criminals simply because they also want the ability to make it home that night to their families.
    Aceoky likes this.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, SAF, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

  4. #3
    Member Array torgo1968's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    420
    Quote Originally Posted by the6shooter View Post
    I have been watching the news today (FOX) the report is that, the two bombing suspects killed the MIT officer, just for his gun.
    If this is true, what are the liberals thinking about disarming Americans.
    This WILL make LE officers even more of a target.
    What will make them more of a target? Criminals are already aware that they can get guns by killing cops.

  5. #4
    Member Array marinevet1994's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ortonville Mi
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by torgo1968 View Post
    What will make them more of a target? Criminals are already aware that they can get guns by killing cops.
    As a criminal which would you rather target, an unoccupied home that might have guns or an armed and probably armored (bulletproof vest) officer? If all the citizens are disarmed then the BG's will be forced to take the greater risk of going after LEO's to replenish their supply of illegal guns. At least that's what I take from the OP's comment.
    Disarming innocent people does not protect innocent people.


    Don't ever think that the reason I'm peaceful is because I'm afraid to be violent!

  6. #5
    Member Array OldCavTrooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    87
    Heard on that Fox report that even though they killed the cop for his weapon, they couldn't get it because "his holster was locked" ???? What is that all about?

  7. #6
    VIP Member Array Taurahe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Indianapolis IN
    Posts
    3,268
    Quote Originally Posted by OldCavTrooper View Post
    Heard on that Fox report that even though they killed the cop for his weapon, they couldn't get it because "his holster was locked" ???? What is that all about?
    He most likely had a level 3 retention holster. If you dont remove the weapon in a certain way, you cant remove it, Method depends on model. Mant use a push down / forwd, then draw method. it is actually very fast, and aids an officer in maintaining weapon retention during a physical altercation as you cannot just draw the gun from any angle. Or he may have hgad a thumbreak and the suspects did not know it...several possibilities.

    ..... If this is true, it saddens me, but unfortunately it is not the first time an officer has been killed for his weapon and prob wont be the last.
    ”God grants Liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.”
    ~Daniel Webster

    Your points are shallow... my points are Hollow....

  8. #7
    Distinguished Member
    Array Old_Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,243
    Quote Originally Posted by the6shooter View Post
    I have been watching the news today (FOX) the report is that, the two bombing suspects killed the MIT officer, just for his gun.
    If this is true, what are the liberals thinking about disarming Americans.
    This WILL make LE officers even more of a target.

    I am not LE and don't aspire to be (too old). but this really stinks that this officer was just sitting in the cruiser at night, alone with his thoughts, killed because of his gun.

    All of the new england people, If armed would have put a hole in these guy's head, everyone of these people were on alert already.
    Now they are unprotected, legally

    This was not funny, and LE guy's watch your six, you never know whats lurking.
    Unfortunately most people run and hide as we often read about during a shooting or other danger. Most people are afraid of dying and being hurt. They do not want guns. They want cameras on their block so that the police can monitor what is going on. They want someone else to risk their life to protect them. They will give up their rights for this protection. They will allow themselves to be searched when boarding a plane. They will leave their homes when ordered to do so at gunpoint as just happened in Boston and be treated as a suspect until their homes are searched without a warrant or probable cause. It was amazing to watch a section of Boston so easily accept marshal law to catch one person with a pressure cooker bomb and a handgun or two. Many think the end justifies the means but fail to realize that by giving up their rights so easily and placing so much value on life, as precious as it is, that they are showing those in authority how far they can go and how easily our laws can be put aside in the name of security. We have to ask ourselves at what price, security?

    What I saw only supported my opinion that we are moving to a society who is more and more willing to give up privacy and freedom in return for a sense of security. I do not see a future where all are armed.
    msgt/ret and ccw9mm like this.
    The worst thing about growing old is that other men no longer see you as dangerous.

  9. #8
    Member Array OldCavTrooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by Taurahe View Post
    He most likely had a level 3 retention holster. If you dont remove the weapon in a certain way, you cant remove it, Method depends on model. Mant use a push down / forwd, then draw method. it is actually very fast, and aids an officer in maintaining weapon retention during a physical altercation as you cannot just draw the gun from any angle. Or he may have hgad a thumbreak and the suspects did not know it...several possibilities.

    ..... If this is true, it saddens me, but unfortunately it is not the first time an officer has been killed for his weapon and prob wont be the last.
    Thanks for the info TAURAHE. I just wish he could have used it on them. Salute to a fallen one.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

do mit officers carry guns

Click on a term to search for related topics.