Yoy need to take a Constitutional Law Course. MUSLIMS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES HAVE NO RIGHTS UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION until they are allowed to legally enter the US of A . We can and do deny access to many foreigners for varied reasons each and every day of the week. I won't comment on the rest of your rant, not worth the time or effort.As much as I probably shouldn't do this it'd be totally unconstitutional to ban a people because of their religion. The Bill of Rights protect the freedom of the expression of religion...any religion. We'd be no better than any nation that bans Christianity, Buddhism, or Judaism (all just an example).
That being said Islam is a Trojan horse within our country. Those Muslims that try to come over here you can deny them access based on marketable skill, or the lack thereof, or some other excuse anyone can conger up to bar entrance into America. But you can't ban just based on religion. It's hypocritical.
Also Trump is just saying the flavor of the day. He's more than a flash in the pan but the guy's a moron who has no touch of reality. He expects to be elected and have Mexico, who can't afford to feed their people, to pay for a wall so they can keep their citizens that are starving and hate their government to stay there. He's an idiot. :rant2:
Yes, but I think you are misconstruing what it means and why it is in the statutes. I think you actually have it upside down. That provision is to provide for asylum for those who are being persecutedTrump is not my #1 pick but I agree with him on this issue.
Now I'm not a lawyer or expert on immigration law. But I have seen the below information cited from a multiplicity of sources. Please debunk this if not true. It seems to very much prefer a religious test under US immiigration statutes, at least for those seeking asylum.
"Under federal law, the executive branch [of the United States of America] is expressly required to take religion into account in determining who is granted asylum. Under the provision governing asylum (section 1158 of Title 8, US Code), an alien applying for admission must establish that … religion [among other things] ... was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant."
And it is in the federal statutes!
"
Same with weaponry in general, or alcohol. You can criminalize this vendor, or that source, this amount or that style. But even when official zones of prayer and worship are torn down those folks who still believe will find a way. In this era of instantly-available alternative sources and electronic info gathering, it's all but impossible to halt influences reaching a willing person. It's only a matter of time. Banning booze in the '20's did nothing. Banning arms in the '90's did nothing. Focusing on the permissions schemes du jour do nothing. Murderers ignore all the prohibitions, least of which is about the products and tools.But unless you plan on banning mosques, then it's not like they're not going to have places to go and radicalize anyway.