Finally payin' off

This is a discussion on Finally payin' off within the Law Enforcement, Military & Homeland Security Discussion forums, part of the Related Topics category; I see that our efforts in Iraq are finally paying off. At the nominal cost of half a trillion dollars and who knows how many ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Finally payin' off

  1. #1
    Distinguished Member Array RSSZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,843

    Finally payin' off

    I see that our efforts in Iraq are finally paying off. At the nominal cost of half a trillion dollars and who knows how many American casualties,the AP has reported in the newspaper yesterday that the Iraqi's are paying $.05 a gallon for gasolene. If we stay another 5 or so years it probably will be FREE.(for them) And of course we helped them have the right to vote. Have we helped solve the terrorism problem throughout the world?? Have we made American citizens safer?? Well-- I !!!! Hummmmm ???? ----------

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,311

    So...What Are You trying To Say?

    Well, we have killed about 30 thousand Muslim Fundamentalists who hated us enough to want innocent Americans dead just because we're Americans & not Muslims. We busted up their training camps and we turned then into fleshy paste. I happen to like them much better dead than alive.
    They want us dead just because we don't read the Koran & flop down on the ground toward Mecca 4 times a day. That's our big crime in life...we don't dig Mohammed and we need to die because of that.
    There is no way of ever knowing how many of them would have tried to come here to turn the U.S. into another Israel where car bombs are going off on every street corner & in every restaurant. The dumb, brain dead morons keep flooding into Iraq from neighboring countries to take their crack at killing our American soldiers & we are doing a pretty damn decent job of thinning out their ranks & making them very dead.
    At this point in time we have still lost more Americans in 9/11 than in our war on Iraq. I sure don't want see American soldiers die but, if I were younger I would be over there right now.
    I personally would volunteer.
    And don't think (for one minute) that we have not had a profound impact on those countries psychologically...even though they are keeping a good "poker face" about it all. Next time we're not going to get permission from the United Nations before we go in either.
    Trust me they KNOW that if they attack the United States that we are going to turn their Home Turf into a Garbage Dump Toxic Wasteland.
    They don't want us to know that they know it but, they know it.
    Personally (at this point in time) I think we should nuke about 50 mosques over there right now. That's just my opinion though.
    We can't even measure the number of dollars that 9/11 cost this country in lost revenue & a couple more of those would have thrown the United States into an Economic & Total Panic Tailspin. A Trillion dollars would be "pocket change" compared to what two more major terror attackes inside the U.S. would cost this country. So...is everything going absolutely Ginger Peachy over in Iraq???...No, it isn't.
    But, if we had just gone in right away & started blowing things up & killing people instead of playing damn footsie with the United Nations for 8 months ~ which DID give the radicals more than enough time to move all of those munitions & explosives into Iran & Syria & who knows where else...we would have been out there by now.
    Maybe "if and when" we have another domestic terror attack in the United States we should just let you and John Kerry handle it.

    So...What would you have done differently? I'm curious.

  4. #3
    VIP Member
    Array Team American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,826
    Well said, QK!

    We have taken on a pretty large job...draining the swamp of wahabist islamic fundamentalism won't be quick or easy, but it is absolutely essential for a couple of reasons:

    As you stated, imposing sharia (islamic law) on the world is their stated goal...think Taliban in your neighborhood.

    The Middle East and their supply of oil is (at this time) critical to the economy of the entire world, not just the USA...the rest of the planet may whine about "American Imperialism", but I'll bet that they are quietly pleased to see us do the heavy lifting to secure the world's oil supply...and make no mistake; the islamists would gladly cut off the oil supply to cripple the worlds economy and further their goals.

    Afghanistan and Iraq are only the opening acts in this struggle....
    "I surrounded 'em"- Alvin York

    "They're ain't many troubles that a man can't fix with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six"- Jeff Cooper

  5. #4
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,311

    The Price Of Gas

    Who cares what they are paying for a gallon of gas in Iraq? What does that hafta do with anything? They are paying $8.00 a gallon for gas in Europe & they are not involved in Iraq.
    I also sure don't want to downplay the loss of American life. I sure don't want to see piles of American soldiers die but, we have lost more than 2,000 troops in an hour in War II & there were not a whole lot of whining crybaby Ex Love Child Hippie Mothers moaning all over the country about it.
    My Mother In Law had six (count em) Six of her brothers all serving at the same time and the family at home was worried absolutely sick about it but, they kept their mouths shut. My Dad & his four Brothers fought & his Sister was a War Nurse.
    Lets not get too used to fighting wars where nobody ever gets hurt or killed.
    China WILL be able to send NUKES over here in two years. For right now...They are are HAPPY to keep taking our Cash American Dollars for that cheap garbage they make over there (that we can't seem to get enough of) BUT, they ABSOLUTELY hate us too!
    What are we going do about that?
    Nothing?
    Maybe we need another Clintonesque type president in the White House to "look the other way" and ignore everything for 8 more years.

  6. #5
    Member Array Kentucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    118
    Right on !!!! I can just about guarantee you that with 20-25 years , China will not only 'own' us but the rest of the world will be bowing down to them also. They have been planning basically that for years and it is approaching exponantialy !!
    diplomacy ... the art of saying "nice doggie"..while looking for a big rock !!

  7. #6
    Lead Moderator
    Array rstickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    21,804
    Quote Originally Posted by QKShooter
    Trust me they KNOW that if they attack the United States that we are going to turn their Home Turf into a Garbage Dump Toxic Wasteland.
    In my opinion (and they do frequently get me in trouble) that IS the problem....... They DON'T care!! As long as they think they'll be going to a better place we can't win by "playing nice". And most of us are not as willing to die as they are (I'm not), if we were we'd be "winning".

    Quote Originally Posted by QKShooter
    So...What would you have done differently? I'm curious.
    Now there is the $64,000 question! My only thought would have not gone into Iraq (at this time), but now it's too late. If we can't finish this one in a satifactory way we might as well hunker down and prepare for the storm.
    Rick

    EOD - Initial success or total failure

  8. #7
    Senior Moderator
    Array HotGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    14,877
    No nukes...

    puts too much radioactive trash in the atmoshpere...

    If we just carpet bomb them with with fuel/air bombs set to go off at about 500 feet above ground and every mile or so, it would do the same thing without endangering the whole world.

    See ? Where there is a "will" there is a way...

  9. #8
    Distinguished Member Array RSSZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,843
    "What would you(I) have done differently?" Since I am not privy to the same daily intel briefings that the President is, that is hard for me to say---BUT---if you want another comment from me then here it is.>>> We should (should have) put some of our military on our borders to take care of the problem that the ordinary civilians(milita) are trying to take care of down in Texas right now. BTW, I applaud them and their efforts. The reserves and the National Guard troops that are leaving their families,some of them for the third time, to go to Afganastan and Iraq, should be used as they were ment to be used,to protect the homeland. I feel that means here at home. Bring them home. Put them on our boarders with orders to shoot anybody,reguardless of sex or age,that attempts to illegally cross the boarder. Is it possible to secure our boarders?Sure it is! ----------Remember the detailed picture,that the President showed us(me AND you)of the 18 wheeler that was a "mobile chemical lab". Remember the president telling the American people how Saddam HAD(not might have,not could have,not that we suspect him of having)weapons of mass destruction. He did not tell us that we were going to invade Iraq to secure "the worlds oil supply". Where are those weapons? Don't you think that if they had ever,at any time, been there(in Iraq)that we would have come up with some(any) trace of them?? I know what some of you will say. They were their but he moved them prior to our invasion. I don't want any President to come on national TV and lie to my face. If he says"Iraq has weapons of mass destruction". Or if he says"I did not have sex with that woman." If the President does not have all the facts then he should hold his comments until such a time as he does. I know what your thinking. President Bush had been briefed that Iraq had WMD. That's true,but he is the"captain of the ship". He is the person responsible. If he knew and lied,it's his fault.If he did not take the time to find out all the facts,it's his fault. Take your pick. If I was in his shoes and the intel community told me these things as facts and I inturn told the American people on national TV,when I found out about it----HEADS WOULD ROLL. How many people have you heard lost their job or went to jail for feeding the President false intel ?? I feel that the President told the intel community what he wanted to hear and they told him just that. My main concern is that we will NEVER be able to bring out soldiers and sailors home. I love my country. I hate terrorists. I want my country to just make them disappear. Don't tell me how,where,or how many. I want my country to take care of it's own people,not the people in other countries. Is a country a direct threat to America? If so lets take care of the problem. If another country is lead by a brutal dictator that routinely kills his own people, too bad.Their,see,I'm not insensative.I JUST DON'T CARE !------------

  10. #9
    DC Founder
    Array Bumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    20,045
    +1, QKShooter.

    There was a time that everyone, even the Democratic opposition, agreed that Sadam had WMDs and I believe he either did and got rid of them or the stuff is still buried in that sandpit (armpit) of a country. He buried a load of fighters out in the desert, why would he not also bury that type of weapon? I don't think Bush lied, he has taken it on the chin becuase we haven't found it yet.

    I completely agree with comments on Bush not protecting our borders, and I have a REAL problem with that, but he is doing the right thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now, IMHO. His daddy pulled out too fast and people have never let him live it down. Now we have someone that is committed to stay there until the job is done and the Democrats want him to pull the troops out so they can then say he was wrong all along. The problem with fighting a war these days is there is too much of it on TV. We have to hear of every individual that dies in this war. The media and the Democrats are trying to personalize the war to garner opposition. And it appears to be working on people that don't understand the importance of the commitment to stay until we can leave without the old factions (or new ones) taking over again.

    No more attacks in the US illustrates the value of the war and is going a long way to keep us safe over here. Wait until a Democrat gets into office and pulls troops out of Iraq and it starts all over again. Then let's revisit this topic.....
    Bumper
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde; Beware the anger of a patient man.

  11. #10
    Senior Member Array Free American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    749
    Whether or not the WMDs were there, whether or not Iraq was an immediate threat, whether or not things are going the way we wanted them to. This war was necessary as Iraq was a terrorist resort!
    They who give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin


    Previously known as "cjm5874"

  12. #11
    Distinguished Member Array AutoFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Arid Zone A
    Posts
    1,561
    It's always easy to Monday Morning Quarterback. Put yourself in Pres. Bush's place. You have just had 3000 people murdered on our own soil by terrorists. Everyone in the US and international intelligence community plus lots of other people know that Iraq has Nuclear, Chemical and Biological weapons unaccounted for since the last war. Iraq is ruled by a ruthless dictator and the country sits between two of the biggest state supporters of terrorism in the Middle East. The Oil For Food program is a sham allowing Saddam to purchase whatever he wants. The Afganistan effort is going very well. Now do you wait until a [radioactive mushroom cloud / genetically engineered plague / subway filled with nerve gas] terrorist attack occurs, or do you act to remove one of a long list of terrorist supporting governments?

    And Lebanon took back their freedom and Kaddaffi gave up his WMD without us even flying a bomber over either country.

    My complaint is still the open borders. Pull the troops out of Europe, Korea, etc. Keep the bases overseas open as staging areas. Put our troops on the borders and close them. If someone is caught trying to enter illegally, put them on a slow freighter to the farthest southern point of Mexico. If they aren't Mexican, stuff them in Gitmo until we can confirm they are not terrorists, then ship them back by freighter. If an illegal is found in this country, seize their assets and offset the cost of repatriating them to their home country. If an employer hires an illegal to work for them, fine them the amount it would cost them to hire an American citizen for that calendar year.

    Ok, I'll get down off the soapbox now...

  13. #12
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,311

    Thumbs up AutoFan

    Thank You for your downright excellent comment.
    Liberty Over Tyranny Μολὼν λαβέ

  14. #13
    DC Founder
    Array Bumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    20,045
    Yeah, I have to agree with you, AutoFan, enough is enough on the border issue. The illegals should be returned as far away as we can get them so it is an ordeal to get back. And I absolutely agree that those that employee them should face some stiff fines and penalties. That's the only way we can stem the tide without building a strong wall; don't give them jobs....
    Bumper
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde; Beware the anger of a patient man.

  15. #14
    Distinguished Member Array RSSZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,843
    So,would it be wrong on my part to assume that you gentlemen are in favor of invaiding North Korea ?? How about Iran ?? These two fit the bill---both terriorist hideouts and they have the very real possibility of having WMD. What say ye ??

  16. #15
    VIP Member
    Array Team American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,826
    Quote Originally Posted by RSSZ
    So,would it be wrong on my part to assume that you gentlemen are in favor of invaiding North Korea ??
    Yes, it would be. (Speaking only for myself, of course)
    Quote Originally Posted by RSSZ
    How about Iran??
    Iran with nuclear weapons is more of a threat. I believe that they have threatened to nuke Isreal the minute they have the means to do it. I don't think for 1 minute that Isreal is going to stand by and let them do it, however. Will it be necessary to "invade" Iran after their nuke capability has been diminished? I can't say. It will get very ugly very fast if general war breaks out in the region, and we will have to get involved to secure the oil supplies...particularly in the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic choke-point for worldwide oil delivery.
    Or...can we just bring all the troops home from Iraq, pretend 9/11 never happened (or at least try to forget and forgive), get back to life as it was before all the unpleasantness, and be ready to accept that an occaisonal attack on the scale of 9/11 is just going to happen, and that's the way it has to be?
    I think that the reality of the world we live in is this: the nuclear genie can't be stuffed back in the bottle....Pandora's box has been opened and we can't close it. And it's going to get uglier in the future. Do we take steps now to secure our future, or get back to chasing interns and letting the (sorry 'bout this, Chris ) U.N. handle the situation?
    In my opinion, .05 cent gasoline in Iraq isn't where your attention should be focused, RSSZ.
    "I surrounded 'em"- Alvin York

    "They're ain't many troubles that a man can't fix with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six"- Jeff Cooper

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Finally got it!
    By smed1869 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: March 4th, 2010, 03:26 PM
  2. Finally getting serious
    By Balog in forum New Members Introduce Yourself
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: January 10th, 2010, 11:38 PM
  3. Finally got it!
    By BlackShadow0 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: December 24th, 2009, 11:20 AM
  4. Finally did it!!
    By H. Lee in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: January 28th, 2007, 01:25 AM