Las Vegas Costco shooting ruled justifiable

Las Vegas Costco shooting ruled justifiable

This is a discussion on Las Vegas Costco shooting ruled justifiable within the In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly forums, part of the The Back Porch category; http://www.lvrj.com/news/officer-tes...103943584.html...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Las Vegas Costco shooting ruled justifiable

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bethesda, MD
    Posts
    939

    Las Vegas Costco shooting ruled justifiable



  2. #2
    Senior Moderator
    Array MattInFla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    4,863
    Take away lesson - don't point guns at the police.

    Matt
    Battle Plan (n) - a list of things that aren't going to happen if you are attacked.
    Blame it on Sixto - now that is a viable plan.

  3. #3
    VIP Member Array Guns and more's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Fl
    Posts
    2,391
    I am glad at least this incident got some sunshine.
    The victim died because his senses were dulled by morphine (oxycontin?) and Xanax.
    He probably thought he would show the police he was handing over his holstered weapon.

    What is the lesson (other than the obvious)? When faced with conflicting orders, keep your hands high and get on the ground.
    I still think this is a sad case.

    I am more convinced that ever that every LEO needs to carry a voice recorder on his person so every command has a record.

  4. #4
    Distinguished Member
    Array fastk9dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    1,554
    Interesting article. The family calls the process broken and the police are covering up, but they submitted some of the questions to be asked and then it's a jury that decides if it was justifiable or not. Then the lawyer goes on to say he has 25 other eyewitnesses that contradict the 59 that the DA had but didn't want to give them the list of names so they wouldn't get "brow beat" by the prosecution. Could of, should of, would of... Sounds like he doesn't have much confidence in his witness statements.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array Sig35seven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,115
    Eriks father, Bill Scott said " the store bears the brunt of responsibility in his son's death."
    "This is focused on Metro right now. Metro pulled the trigger," he said. "But Costco was the primary guilty party. Costco killed Erik."

    Can anyone explain to me how the heck did Costco kill Erik? Because they called the police? This sounds typical of people looking for money from the deepest pockets they can find. This is a good example of how 'loser pays' could make them think twice about suing them. They will look to settle out of court because in court they may very well lose.
    "Confidence is food for the wise man but liquor for the fool"

  6. #6
    VIP Member Array Janq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,781
    Sig,

    This sounds typical and exactly same as the many other cases where peoples parents and family remark that their baby couldn't have done this...It wasn't him...It was a setup...It was mistaken identity...He was just turning his life around...He's a good person, really...That's not like him at all!

    With respect to the family they are in grief, as are and have been every other family of same past to present.
    But at the end of the day facts are facts....And a person is responsible for their own actions singular.
    The catalyst for all of this happening falls squarely on to the shoulders of Erik Scott.

    He made the choices he'd made in life leading up to this event.

    Ignore for a moment the prescription drug abuse and toss out the witness statements toward his demeanor of the _relevant_ recent past just prior to his incident at the Costco, pointing guns at his neighbor and stepping on his dog. while acting aggressive and violent as well as irrational. Ignore all that.
    Focus only on the day of at Costco. Nobody at Costco nor of the police told him never mind made him display his firearm in the store, so as to be seen by store staff as being armed...Whihc is against the stores policy.
    Nobody told nor made him open store product boxes and mishandle store product whihc also is against store policy, and for that matter most any stores policy. Which is what directly caught attention of store security in thinking that this dude was contemplating an attempt to shoplift items.
    Nobody told nor made Erik Scott to become combative and belligerent upon being first asked then secondarily told to leave the store by both security and management, prior to them both dialing 911.
    Nobody told nor made Erik Scott stay at Costco either after being informed that the cops were coming, for him (!) as due to his behavior. That right there is in itself a strong clue for a rational thinking and acting person to LEAVE.

    Further as to the idea that maybe he was given two conflicting commands by police; "Get to the ground" and "Drop your weapon"...Which very likely occurred in that order, get to the ground first followed by DROP YOUR WEAPON! as one or more of the three officers saw him reach for his gun (!)...Any rational minded thinking person would know that the last thing you do around cops with guns pointed at you is to go touching any guns period. You shoot your hands up and high where they can be seen being far away from any potential weapons. Just as in the article the police note every other CCW related encounter has been like.
    But if given a choice of the two as at the exact same time; Then what would a rational thinking not born yesterday person would choose to do? You get to the ground with your hands remaining in the air. That's what you do. You don't go touching your own gun in some maybe attempt to disarm yourself. That is just suicide, as was the result here.

    Bottom line at the end of the day Erik Scott killed Erik Scott.
    By his own hand as per his own actions following his own very likely unlawfully abused prescription drug addled irrational mindset manner of behavior.

    People who carry guns and DO NOT act as such above, do not find them self being shot down...And they are able to shop in a Costco any day of the week without issue (as I have done very many times to date) with no one but themself and God knowing that they are armed.
    Because concealed means concealed, acting like a crazy person results in cops being called and when cops say get to the ground they mean GET TO THE GROUND.

    At the end of the day Erik Scott made his choices toward living his life, and that is what got him killed as a result.

    - Janq

    "Officers William Mosher, Thomas Mendiola and Joshua Stark shot Scott a total of seven times after he ignored commands to get on the ground and raised his Kimber .45-caliber handgun, still in its holster, toward Mosher, according to the officers and several witnesses who testified at the inquest.

    A Costco employee had called police to the store that Saturday afternoon because the 38-year-old medical device salesman was acting erratically and wouldn't leave the store when told his gun was not allowed.

    ...Eyewitness accounts of the incident vary on some points, but a majority of witnesses said they either saw Scott pull a gun or thought he was about to do so when his hand went to his hip. Most also said they heard one officer shouting at Scott to get on the ground." - End of story
    "Killers who are not deterred by laws against murder are not going to be deterred by laws against guns. " - Robert A. Levy

    "A license to carry a concealed weapon does not make you a free-lance policeman." - Florida Div. of Licensing

  7. #7
    VIP Member Array mcp1810's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    5,105
    Now how long do we have to wait for the civil case? After a "real trial" like the Scott family's lawyer wants perhaps we can put this all behind us.
    Sad for the family but sad things happen to people everywhere every day.
    Who knows, if family and friends had perhaps done an intervention for the substance abuse Eirk may still be alive today.
    Infowars- Proving David Hannum right on a daily basis

  8. #8
    VIP Member Array Janq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,781
    Quote Originally Posted by mcp1810 View Post
    Sad for the family but sad things happen to people everywhere every day.
    Who knows, if family and friends had perhaps done an intervention for the substance abuse Eirk may still be alive today.
    Agreed.

    Or at the very least they may have better known that their son was unstable, and not be caught with this episode by surprise.
    It does not appear that his family knew Erik Scott all that well as to a current/recent personal life and living degree.

    It's also interesting that his GF did not appear at court to make a statement either even as she was a direct witness, to assumedly support the family's claim that Erick was acting in a reasonable and rational mind.

    Even shiny seemingly washed people (as opposed to the dirty faced unwashed) do act out, behave wrongly and commit crimes...too.
    Contrary to all the oh he went to the Citadel, or what ever school/college, and thus couldn't possibly have behaved badly or mishandled a firearm (!) commentary from folks early in as this story broke.

    - Janq
    "Killers who are not deterred by laws against murder are not going to be deterred by laws against guns. " - Robert A. Levy

    "A license to carry a concealed weapon does not make you a free-lance policeman." - Florida Div. of Licensing

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bethesda, MD
    Posts
    939
    well said Janq. Erik Scott's addiction killed him. Happens in the inner city every day. No one bats an eye.

  10. #10
    Ex Member Array BikerRN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    State of Discombobulation
    Posts
    5,253
    Mr. Janq,

    That was a well written and well thought out post that I doubt even our most learned colleagues could top.

    Biker

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array swinokur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bethesda, MD
    Posts
    939
    Second that Biker

    +1

  12. #12
    Member Array mcgyver210's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    282
    All I can say I 100% agree with this statement in the article.

    "People just expect the police officers to get vindicated," McLetchie said. "Nobody has confidence in the system anymore."

    I knew I lost confidence when I started carrying a recorder to protect my self. This is sad since I used to be very Pro LEO long ago.

  13. #13
    VIP Member Array dukalmighty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    15,179
    If I was faced with a similar situation,one thing I'm not gonna do is place my hand anywhere my gun,my hands are straight up fingers spread,even slow movements towards your waist or pocket with a statement,I'm gonna show you I'm unarmed etc. wouldn't be the first time a BG was trying to get the cops off guard and suddenly pull a gun.even if you are legally armed the cops don't care,until they have the situation under control and can then start figuring out who said or who did what
    "Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country,"
    --Mayor Marion Barry, Washington , DC .

  14. #14
    Distinguished Member Array 21bubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    ky.
    Posts
    1,890
    I'll wager this is not even close to over.

  15. #15
    Moderator
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    45,512
    Sure sounds like a 'self-inflicted wound' to me...or just the same as...
    Never, never handle your weapon when being addressed by LEO's.
    The last Blood Moon Tetrad for this millennium starts in April 2014 and ends in September 2015...according to NASA.

    ***********************************
    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member[/B]

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Shooting of officer is ruled justifiable (Off-duty lawman called aggressor)
    By PGann in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: September 13th, 2010, 05:45 PM
  2. Shooting of officer is ruled justifiable.
    By mcmurry in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 6th, 2010, 06:12 PM
  3. Suffolk (VA) cemetery shooting that left man dead ruled justifiable
    By paramedic70002 in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: December 20th, 2009, 01:07 PM
  4. Justifiable shooting question
    By ENSANE1970 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: September 13th, 2007, 09:32 PM
  5. CHL student...Justifiable Shooting
    By HotGuns in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: August 27th, 2007, 08:25 PM

Search tags for this page

ccw holder shot costco
,
ccw shooting in vegas costco on drugs
,
cocealed carry holder shot costco
,
costco idaho concealed weapon
,

costco shooting concealed carry

,
defensivecarry
,
erik scott costco shooting
,
florida costco ccw shooting
,
results costco shooting
Click on a term to search for related topics.