This is a discussion on Mexican rancher v. drug gang; both lose within the In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Originally Posted by 3D From the NY Post article: "The lionhearted rancher was ready when two truckloads of heavily armed gang members returned the next ...
He die for what he believe in! The bull **** stops here and even after losing his life. Hopefully others had seen what he did and will start their own gang aganist these cartels.
I trained everyday and will be ready for the day that I have to defend myself or my family!
I was kin to that man, I'd hunt the punks down one by one and not stop until the threat was eliminated.
The Rancher did not have Grenades...What if he had a couple of RPG's ?. makes u wonder.
Last edited by enigmaone; December 7th, 2010 at 10:18 PM. Reason: spelling errors
quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
What a way to go at 77!... He stood up for himself, and hopefully his sacrifice will get the people to fight for themselves
I wonder what would happen if this happened in Texas or AZ?
Probly...but if the rancher lives he would be put in jail for murderin people trying to make a better life or some other excuse to steer people from firghting these ________ers
I call this a win for the Rancher. He died with his boots on and as long as he was alive, they got nothing but pain. He lived a good life and went out fighting for what he believed in. It doesnt get much better than that. Sure beats dying in a bed a few years later of body failure. He went out on his terms.
I agree he went out with his boots on in a blaze of glory defending what he worked hard for and wasn't going to let anyone take that from him without a fight. There comes a time when enough is enough at least he took a some of them with him. I espect this guys bravery and action and hop eit helps unite these people to put a stop to all the crap going on down there.
He takes out 6 of them with a gun and they have to use grenades makes you wonder how it would have turned out if the fight was fair. (even though there is no such thing)
-Blackstone’s Commentaries 145–146, n. 42 (1803) in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)Americans understood the right of self-preservation as permitting a citizen to repel force by force
when the intervention of society... may be too late to prevent an injury.