Chicago man acquitted in fatal shooting.

Chicago man acquitted in fatal shooting.

This is a discussion on Chicago man acquitted in fatal shooting. within the In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Judge rules shooting self-defense. According to testimony in the bench trial , Fullilove had been celebrating the Super Bowl victory by the New Orleans Saints ...

Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By beni

Thread: Chicago man acquitted in fatal shooting.

  1. #1
    Member Array socal2310's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Camarillo, CA
    Posts
    467

    Chicago man acquitted in fatal shooting.

    Judge rules shooting self-defense.

    According to testimony in the bench trial, Fullilove had been celebrating the Super Bowl victory by the New Orleans Saints and was extremely intoxicated when he approached Mayfield and his two daughters -- 15 and 11 -- and their young friend as they waited for a bus at 6114 S. King Dr.

    When Fullilove offered to sell drugs to those at the bus stop, Mayfield told him, “We’re just trying to get home -– we’re not with that,” according to testimony. After Fullilove became aggressive, Mayfield showed him the gun and said, “I’ll use it.”

    Fullilove walked away but came back moments later and was captured on a city surveillance camera swinging his fists at Mayfield and chasing him. At one point, the eldest daughter got in between the men and said, “Leave my daddy alone.” Mayfield then pulled out the gun and fired once from about three feet away, according to testimony.
    Few people realize that you may waive your right to jury trial, and in many cases, it's the right call. I can't remember the last time I heard of someone who wasn't a police officer doing so.

    Ryan
    Those who will not govern their own behavior are slaves waiting for a master; one will surely find them.


  2. #2
    Senior Member Array Tzadik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Suffolk, Virginia
    Posts
    609
    I'm glad to here that he's not being charged with weapons violations and that he was aqquitted, but not that he had to spend 5 months in jail before hand.
    The prosecutor should be held responsible for compensation.

    Just my humble opinion.

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    44,760
    Justified shooting according to the facts, in my book. Too bad he had to wait in jail for 5 months.
    At least the drunk dirtbag selling drugs and attacking strangers is now permanently out of business.
    The last Blood Moon Tetrad for this millennium starts in April 2014 and ends in September 2015...according to NASA.

    ***********************************
    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member[/B]

  4. #4
    VIP Member
    Array ksholder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,938
    Sounds like the judge is getting a jump on the legislature in IL. Glad the guy is OK and found not guilty via self defense. Not sure how this comports with IL law, however. Maybe the judge read the Ezell ruling and decided the state's position on guns is unconstitutional and ruled accordingly.
    It's the Land of Opportunity, not the Land of Entitlements - Vote America!!!

    "When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny." Thomas Jefferson

    You are only paranoid until you are right - then you are a visionary.

  5. #5
    Distinguished Member Array ArkhmAsylm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    1,377
    Good news all around.

    Illinois government, wake up!
    "Historical examination of the right to bear arms, from English antecedents to the drafting of the Second Amendment, bears proof that the right to bear arms has consistently been, and should still be, construed as an individual right." -- U.S. District Judge Sam Cummings, Re: U.S. vs Emerson (1999)

  6. #6
    Member Array Phoenixx6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    34
    I'm actually amazed he's not facing weapons charges with the trial in Cook County. I'm glad he's not but this is Chicago, the anti-gun of the state.
    They're still working on the requirements just to own a handgun in the city; carrying one, concealed, is still a major, major no-no.
    Last I remember reading the Chicago version of Castle Doctrine doesn't even extend to your garage or front porch, I can't imagine it applying to a bus stop.

    An appropriate decision by the judge as defending your person is supposed to be a basic tennant of natural law. Some nice juris precedence on this one should it happen again. Hopefully the laws follow to habitually enable men and women like Elliot Mayfield in the future. I wish the article said if he got the gun back (I doubt it, but with no weapons charges maybe?).

  7. #7
    VIP Member Array paramedic70002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Franklin, VA
    Posts
    5,135
    Based on what's reported here I think that would be a bad shoot in most parts of the country. Defendant brandished illegally carried firearm, then shoots lone attacker in a less than lethal situation (as determined through numerous court decisions throughout the years, a fist fight is not a lethal encounter unless extenuating circumstances exist).
    "Each worker carried his sword strapped to his side." Nehemiah 4:18

    Guns Save Lives. Paramedics Save Lives. But...
    Paramedics With Guns Scare People!

  8. #8
    Member Array crabbys44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by paramedic70002 View Post
    Based on what's reported here I think that would be a bad shoot in most parts of the country. Defendant brandished illegally carried firearm, then shoots lone attacker in a less than lethal situation (as determined through numerous court decisions throughout the years, a fist fight is not a lethal encounter unless extenuating circumstances exist).
    "the eldest daughter got in between the men and said, “Leave my daddy alone.”

    He is with his 11 & 15 year old daughters and one gets between the drunken violent drug dealer and him. I would think that qualifies as "extenuating circumstances."

    When is deadly force authorized? To prevent death or great bodily harm? You don't think he had an articulatable fear for his daughter's imminent death or great bodily harm?
    Courage is endurance for one moment more…

    Hollowpoints might expand, but bullets won't shrink.

    Μολών Λαβέ

  9. #9
    Member Array beni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    493
    I remember hearing of other cases in chicago where people were defending themselves with handguns and the police deciding not to charge them. And this was before the Supreme Court ruled that the handgun ban is unconstitutional.
    KingWalleye likes this.

  10. #10
    Member Array KingWalleye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    The Peoples Republik of Illinois
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by ksholder View Post
    Sounds like the judge is getting a jump on the legislature in IL. Glad the guy is OK and found not guilty via self defense. Not sure how this comports with IL law, however. Maybe the judge read the Ezell ruling and decided the state's position on guns is unconstitutional and ruled accordingly.
    Well said. Same with a few other responders in that this ruling shows that the winds of change are blowing in Illinois. Ever since SCOTUS slapped DC and then Chicago their have been several defensive shootings with no criminal charges filed. This shooting was before the McDonald ruling which explains why he sat in jail for so long. That and not being able to afford decent legal defense.

    But then again, during the years of Chicago's handgun ban very few people were ever prosecuted for it because they were almost always without a valid FOID which carries a more severe punishment than the local handgun ordinance.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

acquitted of shooting cop

,

chicago castle doctrine garage

,

chicago man acquitted of shooting cops

,

chicago man acquitted of shooting police

,

chicago man aquitted after shooting officer

,

man acquited of shooting police officer in chicago

,

man acquitted for shooting cop

,

man acquitted of shooting cop

,

man acquitted of shooting cops

,

man acquitted of shooting police

,

not guilty chicago bus stop self defense

Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» DefensiveCarry Sponsors