Continuation of the Kroger shooting
This is a discussion on Continuation of the Kroger shooting within the In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly forums, part of the The Back Porch category; Perhaps their action is to terminate employees that violate the policy, to whit that was unnecessary since he quit.
I don't see where a non ...
July 24th, 2012 04:53 PM
Perhaps their action is to terminate employees that violate the policy, to whit that was unnecessary since he quit.
I don't see where a non employee would have any control or bearing on a companies employment policy. I hope they fight this suit and not pay a cent in settlement.
July 24th, 2012 05:28 PM
My view (which counts for squat in the grand scheme of things) is that NOBODY and NOBODY'S FAMILY or friends should be able to file a lawsuit for something which occurred as a result of said person participating in a crime. I find it criminal that any of those are allowed.
Last edited by accessbob; July 24th, 2012 at 05:28 PM.
Reason: fix typo
EDC - Glock 21C, M&P Shield .40 OR Ruger SR1911 CMD AND
Ruger LCP in Desantis Pocket Holster (backup)
Member - SAF, OFF,
NRA Life Member
July 24th, 2012 06:31 PM
Amazing... Hoping for 'jackpot justice' for her dead thug son...
US Air Force, 1986 - 2007
"To disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them..." George Mason
July 24th, 2012 06:51 PM
I believe in most states, just the threat of armed robbery is considered armed robbery. Many times someone robbing a bank, even without a weapon, just slipping a note to a teller stating it is a robbery, gets them armed robbery charges.
Originally Posted by mlr1m
Freedom doesn't come free. It is bought and paid for by the lives and blood of our men and women in uniform.
NRA Life Member
July 29th, 2012 09:51 AM
Probably no chance of that. I bet the store manager got fired. It is specifically written in Kroger's employee handbook carring a weapon on company peoperty is immediate termination.
Originally Posted by TheGiant
July 29th, 2012 11:31 AM
Bad part about it is that Kroger will prob.settle out of court to keep them out of the news and out of court.
In other words she will get paid to go away and shut up.
July 29th, 2012 11:40 AM
Sadly that will be the most likely outcome.
Originally Posted by alafan
When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.
"Don't forget, incoming fire has the right of way."
July 29th, 2012 12:54 PM
It is my opinion that Kroger should counter sue her for negligence for her child raising skills. Clearly her offspring was a menace to society. She could have easily aborted his birth. Were it not for the Welfare System in this Country that rewards the poor for having more children than thay can afford to raise and feed. These types of hoodelms are out of control.
I had to pay for my kids upbringing. Why do they get a free ride? And because of the cost of raising a child I limited myself to two offpsing. And they are both tax paying hard working citizens. Neither have ever been arrested or inprisoned.
She should be required to pay back all the support money she got for raising this Criminal. Maninly because she failed to produce a binifit to the Tax Payer Base.
I hope she loses and has to pay Kroger and the Courts Cost for this Law Suit.
I wonder how many other children she has that are on the same career path?
What have you done to prepare for the end of civilization as we know it?