This is ment to be informative and apolitical. The title is the title of the article - not my politics (other than 2A protection).
Attaching it to the cybersecurity bill is a double dumbo move. Both are unpopular, and hanging a high capacity mag rider on an already unpopular bill only draws attention to the bill its self, which should be squashed!
.....Democratic senators have offered an amendment to the cybersecurity bill that would limit the purchase of high capacity gun magazines for some consumers.
Shortly after the Cybersecurity Act gained Senate approval to proceed to filing proposed amendments and a vote next week, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), a sponsor of the gun control amendment, came to the floor to defend the idea of implementing some “reasonable” gun control measures.
.....The amendment was sponsored by Democratic Sens. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Bob Menendez (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Schumer and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.). S.A. 2575 would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition with the exception of .22 caliber rim fire ammunition.
[B] (my comments - good bye to 10+ pistol mags for Defensive Carry!) [B]
.....Next week the Senate is expected to debate and vote on proposed amendments to the cybersecurity bill.
(this is some weak rationalizing going on by the Left side of the Senate - they are using the 'can't we all get along' argument)
Call your Senators to protect your 2A rights. Even Democratic Senators know that Gun Control (even this type of creeping compromise encrochment on your 2A rights is not popular, even in heavily Democratic districts.
Read the rest and the 'arguments' that Chucky S uses: Democratic senators offer gun control amendment for cybersecurity bill - The Hill's Video