and the whole question of whether or not the use of lethal force was justified by the threat comes into play.
Also risk of bystanders in the crowd getting shot too were exceedingly high. IMO sufficiently high
to constitute criminal negligence if it happened.
The use of force was appropriate in this case, but force considerably less than drawing the gun was
probably in order. e.g., pepper, a kick, or how about less ego and just walk away.
I do agree with the earlier poster who said an LEO made a call at the scene so there probably
are lots of pieces of info we don't have.